Literature DB >> 25609573

Soft tissue interposition is effective for protecting the neourethra during hypospadias surgery and preventing postoperative urethrocutaneous fistula: a single surgeon's experience of 243 cases.

Shogo Seo1, Takanori Ochi, Yuta Yazaki, Manabu Okawada, Takashi Doi, Go Miyano, Hiroyuki Koga, Geoffrey J Lane, Atsuyuki Yamataka.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Soft tissue interposition (STI) during hypospadias repair (HR) purportedly prevents postoperative urethrocutaneous fistula (PUF) by supporting the neourethra. We report our experience.
METHODS: Data from 243 hypospadias patients treated by a single surgeon from 1997 to 2014 by urethroplasty (UP) with STI (n = 229; UP + STI) and UP without STI (n = 14; UP-STI) were collated prospectively and compared for incidence of PUF. Re-operative UP were excluded.
RESULTS: Hypospadias was distal (n = 55), mid-shaft (n = 59), proximal/penoscrotal (n = 109), scrotal (n = 15), and perineal (n = 5). UP was single-staged in 86, multi-staged in 157; mean age at UP was 3.1 ± 2.4 years. Soft tissue used for STI was prepucial inner dartos fascia (inner dartos: n = 88), ventral dartos fascia (ventral dartos: n = 15), pedicled external spermatic fascia (ESF: n = 84), adipose tissue surrounding the spermatic cord (pericordal: n = 9), scrotal adipose tissue (n = 8), or a combination of tissues (combined: n = 25). Mean follow-up was 6.4 ± 4.6 (range 0.6-16.8) years. Overall incidence of PUF was 10/243 (4.1 %); 7/229 (3.1 %) for UP + STI and 3/14 (21.4 %) in UP-STI (p < 0.05); incidence versus type of hypospadias was 1/55 for distal (1.8 %), 3/59 for mid-shaft (5.1 %), 5/109 for proximal/penoscrotal (4.6 %), 0/15 for scrotal (0 %), and 1/5 for perineal (20 %); incidence versus type of STI was 7/88 for inner dartos, 0/15 for ventral dartos, 0/84 for ESF, 0/9 for pericordal adipose tissue, 0/8 for scrotal adipose tissue, and 0/25 for combined. All PUF were repaired successfully. Satisfaction with penile cosmesis was acceptable (10.3 %) or good (89.7 %) without any testicular complications or scrotal deformity.
CONCLUSION: STI, especially ESF, would appear to effectively prevent PUF in HR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25609573     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-015-3655-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  25 in total

Review 1.  Current technique of tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Warren T Snodgrass; Michael T Nguyen
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Comparison of outcomes of tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair and circumcision: a questionnaire-based survey of parents and surgeon.

Authors:  Warren Snodgrass; Ali Ziada; Selcuk Yucel; Amit Gupta
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Onlay island flap in the repair of mid and distal penile hypospadias without chordee.

Authors:  J S Elder; J W Duckett; H M Snyder
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Hypospadias: a critical analysis of cosmetic outcomes using photography.

Authors:  L Baskin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty with dorsal inlay graft prevents meatal/neourethral stenosis: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Akihiro Shimotakahara; Nana Nakazawa; Akiko Wada; Sho Nagata; Hiroyuki Koga; Tsubasa Takahashi; Go Miyano; Geoffrey J Lane; Atsuyuki Yamataka
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 6.  Hypospadias.

Authors:  Kate H Kraft; Aseem R Shukla; Douglas A Canning
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 7.  Long-term outcome of hypospadias surgery: current dilemmas.

Authors:  Pierre D E Mouriquand; Daniela B Gorduza; Marie-Emmanuelle Noché; Alexandre Targnion
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Use of tunica vaginalis to prevent fistulas in hypospadias surgery.

Authors:  B W Snow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Single stage hypospadias reconstruction without fistula.

Authors:  E J Kass; D Bolong
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Soft tissue covers in hypospadias surgery: Is tunica vaginalis better than dartos flap?

Authors:  Anjan Kumar Dhua; Satish Kumar Aggarwal; Shandip Sinha; Simmi K Ratan
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2012-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Staged segmental urethroplasty for scrotal/perineal hypospadias: a new concept.

Authors:  Asuka Ishiyama; Shogo Seo; Hiroshi Murakami; Takanori Ochi; Manabu Okawada; Takashi Doi; Go Miyano; Hiroyuki Koga; Geoffrey J Lane; Hidenori Haruna; Toshiaki Shimizu; Atsuyuki Yamataka
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Correction of penile ventral curvature in patients with minor or no hypospadias: a single surgeon's experience of 43 cases.

Authors:  Shogo Seo; Takanori Ochi; Yuta Yazaki; Hiroshi Murakami; Manabu Okawada; Takashi Doi; Go Miyano; Hiroyuki Koga; Geoffrey J Lane; Atsuyuki Yamataka
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Risk factors for failed urethrocutaneous fistula repair after transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty in pediatric hypospadias.

Authors:  Wenwen Han; Weiping Zhang; Ning Sun
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Comparison of continuous eversion and inverting subepithelial suture in transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty in proximal hypospadias repair: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Wenwen Han; Weiping Zhang; Ning Sun; Yanfang Yang
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Comparison of effect between dartos fascia and tunica vaginalis fascia in TIP urethroplasty: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Hao Yang; Xiao-Xiao Xuan; Dong-Lai Hu; Hang Zhang; Qiang Shu; Xiao-Dong Guo; Jun-Fen Fu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.