| Literature DB >> 25609418 |
Angelica Soares1, Evandro José Beraldi2, Paulo Emílio Botura Ferreira3, Roberto Barbosa Bazotte4, Nilza Cristina Buttow5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity has increased at alarming rates, particularly because of the increased consumption of high-fat diets (HFDs). The influence of HFDs on intrinsic innervation and the intestinal wall has not been fully characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate the morpho-quantitative aspects of myenteric neurons and the wall of the small intestine in mice fed a HFD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25609418 PMCID: PMC4316644 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-015-0228-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Nutritional composition of the standard chow and high-fat diet (HFD)
| Standard chow | HFD | |
|---|---|---|
| g/100 g | ||
| Protein | 22 | 20 |
| Carbohydrate | 55 | 35 |
| Total fat | 4 | 35 |
| Fiber | 7 | 5 |
| Micronutrients | 12 | 5 |
| kcal/kg | 3773 | 5358 |
Primary and secondary antibodies used in immunoreactions for myosin-V, nNOS and VIP
| Antibody | Host | Dilution | Company |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myosin-V (Primary) | Rabbit | 1:200 | Buttow |
| nNOS (Primary) | Rabbit | 1:500 | Zymed |
| VIP (Primary) | Rabbit | 1:500 | Península Laboratories, Inc. |
| Anti-rabbit IgG FITC (Secundary) | Rabbit | 1:500 | Santa Cruz Biotecnology |
Parameters assessed in the control group (CON group) and high-fat diet fed group (OB group)
| CON | OB | |
|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 41.7 ± 1.3 | 47.7 ± 1.6*a |
| Visceral fat (g) | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.3***a |
| Length of the small intestine (cm) | 56.8 ± 1.8 | 51.2 ± 1.3*a |
| Circumference of the duodenum (cm) | 0.6 ± 0.02 | 0.5 ± 0.05b |
| Circumference of the jejunum (cm) | 0.5 ± 0.02 | 0.5 ± 0.0002b |
| Circumference of the ileum (cm) | 0.5 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.02*b |
Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 10). *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.0001 vs CON group; aunpaired t-test; bnonparametric test.
Figure 1Neurons of the myenteric plexus and neuronal density in the small intestine of mice. Representative micrographs of neurons in the ileum of the control group, showing the myosin-V-IR general population (A), nNOS-IR subpopulation (D) and VIP-IR varicosities (G) (insert: varicosities detail). Quantitative analysis (neurons per cm2) of myosin-V-IR myenteric neurons and nNOS-IR neurons between groups CON and OB in the duodenum (B, C), jejunum (E, F) and ileum (H, I). The HFD increased the density of myosin-V-IR neurons in the ileum and nNOS-IR neurons in all segments of the small intestine. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs CON group in each intestinal segment; unpaired t-test.
Figure 2Myenteric neuronal morphometry in the small intestine of mice. Morphometric analyses of myosin-V-IR neuronal cell bodies areas, nNOS-IR cell bodies areas and VIP-IR varicosities between groups CON and OB in the duodenum (A-C), jejunum (D-F) and ileum (G-I). The HFD reduced the area of myosin-V-IR neuronal cell bodies (except in the duodenum), nNOS-IR cell bodies and VIP-IR varicosities in all segments of the small intestine. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5); **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001 vs CON group in each intestinal segment; nonparametric test.
Intestinal parameters in the control group (CON group) and high-fat diet fed group (OB group)
| Duodenum | Jejunum | Ileum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | OB | CON | OB | CON | OB | |
| Villi height (μm) | 307.1 ± 4.9 | 353.9 ± 4.3***b | 267.9 ± 4.1 | 311.4 ± 2.6***b | 199.8 ± 2.5 | 169.7 ± 1.5***b |
| Crypts depth (μm) | 90.6 ± 0.9 | 95.4 ± 1.3b | 89.0 ± 0.8 | 87.2 ± 0.8*b | 90.2 ± 0.9 | 67.6 ± 0.6***a |
| Muscular layer (μm) | 37.7 ± 0.5 | 42.0 ± 0.5***b | 35.3 ± 0.4 | 35.7 ± 0.3a | 50.9 ± 0.6 | 41.6 ± 0.4***b |
| Total wall (μm) | 438.1 ± 5.8 | 486.9 ± 6.5***b | 404.2 ± 4.9 | 421.6 ± 3.5**a | 355.7 ± 4.3 | 299.1 ± 2.1***b |
| Cell proliferation (%) | 15.9 ± 0.5 | 16.6 ± 1.6a | 15.6 ± 1.0 | 13.0 ± 1.7a | 15.4 ± 0.5 | 15.1 ± 1.2a |
| Enteroendocrine cells (%) | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1a | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1a | 0.4 ± 0.05 | 0.6 ± 0.03*a |
| Goblet cells (%) | 5.1 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 0.4a | 6.2 ± 0.6 | 7.4 ± 0.4a | 17.0 ± 0.8 | 14.0 ± 0.4**a |
| Intraepithelial lymphocytes (%) | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 6.1 ± 0.1**a | 7.9 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.1***a | 11.0 ± 0.1 | 7.3 ± 0.3***a |
Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 5). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001 vs CON group in each intestinal segment; aunpaired t-test; bnonparametric test.