Literature DB >> 25609067

Integrating RAS status into prognostic signatures for adenocarcinomas of the lung.

Maud H W Starmans1, Melania Pintilie2, Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue3, Nathalie C Moon3, Syed Haider4, Francis Nguyen3, Suzanne K Lau5, Ni Liu2, Arek Kasprzyk6, Bradly G Wouters7, Sandy D Der2, Frances A Shepherd2, Igor Jurisica8, Linda Z Penn5, Ming-Sound Tsao9, Philippe Lambin10, Paul C Boutros11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While the dysregulation of specific pathways in cancer influences both treatment response and outcome, few current prognostic markers explicitly consider differential pathway activation. Here we explore this concept, focusing on K-Ras mutations in lung adenocarcinoma (present in 25%-35% of patients). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: The effect of K-Ras mutation status on prognostic accuracy of existing signatures was evaluated in 404 patients. Genes associated with K-Ras mutation status were identified and used to create a RAS pathway activation classifier to provide a more accurate measure of RAS pathway status. Next, 8 million random signatures were evaluated to assess differences in prognosing patients with or without RAS activation. Finally, a prognostic signature was created to target patients with RAS pathway activation.
RESULTS: We first show that K-Ras status influences the accuracy of existing prognostic signatures, which are effective in K-Ras-wild-type patients but fail in patients with K-Ras mutations. Next, we show that it is fundamentally more difficult to predict the outcome of patients with RAS activation (RAS(mt)) than that of those without (RAS(wt)). More importantly, we demonstrate that different signatures are prognostic in RAS(wt) and RAS(mt). Finally, to exploit this discovery, we create separate prognostic signatures for RAS(wt) and RAS(mt) patients and show that combining them significantly improves predictions of patient outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a nested model for integrated genomic and transcriptomic data. This model is general and is not limited to lung adenocarcinomas but can be expanded to other tumor types and oncogenes. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25609067     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  11 in total

Review 1.  How to Target Activated Ras Proteins: Direct Inhibition vs. Induced Mislocalization.

Authors:  Ethan J Brock; Kyungmin Ji; John J Reiners; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.862

2.  Tumor necrosis factor links chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and K-ras mutant lung cancer through induction of an immunosuppressive pro-tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Lei Gong; Mauricio da Silva Caetano; Amber M Cumpian; Soudabeh Daliri; Alejandra Garza Flores; Seon Hee Chang; Cesar E Ochoa; Christopher M Evans; Zhentao Yu; Seyed Javad Moghaddam
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 8.110

3.  Development of a RNA-Seq Based Prognostic Signature in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sudhanshu Shukla; Joseph R Evans; Rohit Malik; Felix Y Feng; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Xuhong Cao; Guoan Chen; David G Beer; Hui Jiang; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Prognostic and predictive biomarkers post curative intent therapy.

Authors:  Rebecca Feldman; Edward S Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09

5.  Synergistic Inhibition of Drug-Resistant Colon Cancer Growth with PI3K/mTOR Dual Inhibitor BEZ235 and Nano-Emulsioned Paclitaxel via Reducing Multidrug Resistance and Promoting Apoptosis.

Authors:  Yali Hu; Kunpeng Zhang; Xingyao Zhu; Xiuyan Zheng; Chao Wang; Xiao Niu; Teng Jiang; Xinhua Ji; Weilin Zhao; Lijuan Pang; Yan Qi; Feng Li; Li Li; Zhiping Xu; Wenyi Gu; Hong Zou
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-03-15

6.  Biomarkers and subtypes of cancer.

Authors:  Maud H Starmans; Paul C Boutros
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 7.  The path to routine use of genomic biomarkers in the cancer clinic.

Authors:  Paul C Boutros
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  KRAS-driven lung adenocarcinoma: combined DDR1/Notch inhibition as an effective therapy.

Authors:  Chiara Ambrogio; Ernest Nadal; Alberto Villanueva; Gonzalo Gómez-López; Timothy P Cash; Mariano Barbacid; David Santamaría
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-09-06

9.  An 8-gene signature for prediction of prognosis and chemoresponse in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahid; Tae Gyu Choi; Minh Nam Nguyen; Abel Matondo; Yong Hwa Jo; Ji Youn Yoo; Ngoc Ngo Yen Nguyen; Hyeong Rok Yun; Jieun Kim; Salima Akter; Insug Kang; Joohun Ha; Chi Hoon Maeng; Si-Young Kim; Ju-Seog Lee; Jayoung Kim; Sung Soo Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-27

10.  Identification of a prognostic 28-gene expression signature for gastric cancer with lymphatic metastasis.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Li-Wei Jing; Zhi-Ting Li; Zi-Wei Chang; Hui Liu; Qiu-Meng Zhang; Qing-Yu Zhang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.