| Literature DB >> 25608867 |
Hyeon Jeong Lee1, Wandi Zhang2, Delong Zhang2, Yang Yang2, Bin Liu3, Eric L Barker4, Kimberly K Buhman5, Lyudmila V Slipchenko2, Mingji Dai6, Ji-Xin Cheng7.
Abstract
We report a cholesterol imaging method using rationally synthesized phenyl-diyne cholesterol (PhDY-Chol) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscope. The phenyl-diyne group is biologically inert and provides a Raman scattering cross section that is 88 times larger than the endogenous C = O stretching mode. SRS microscopy offers an imaging speed that is faster than spontaneous Raman microscopy by three orders of magnitude, and a detection sensitivity of 31 μM PhDY-Chol (~1,800 molecules in the excitation volume). Inside living CHO cells, PhDY-Chol mimics the behavior of cholesterol, including membrane incorporation and esterification. In a cellular model of Niemann-Pick type C disease, PhDY-Chol reflects the lysosomal accumulation of cholesterol, and shows relocation to lipid droplets after HPβCD treatment. In live C. elegans, PhDY-Chol mimics cholesterol uptake by intestinal cells and reflects cholesterol storage. Together, our work demonstrates an enabling platform for study of cholesterol storage and trafficking in living cells and vital organisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25608867 PMCID: PMC4302291 DOI: 10.1038/srep07930
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Design and synthesis of tagged cholesterol probes.
Reagents and conditions: (a) DHP (5.0 equiv), p-TsOH (0.2 equiv), THF, RT, 91%; (b) LiAlH4 (3.0 equiv), THF, 0°C to RT, 98%; (c) DMP (3.0 equiv), NaHCO3 (3.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0°C, 86%; (d) dimethyl (1-diazo-2-oxopropyl)phosphonate (Bestmann reagent, 2.4 equiv), K2CO3 (4.0 equiv), THF/MeOH, RT, 99%; (e) p-TsOH (1.0 equiv), THF/MeOH, RT, 84%; (f) Iodobenzene (1.02 equiv), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.05 equiv), CuI (0.05 equiv), TEA, RT; then p-TsOH (1.0 equiv), THF/MeOH, RT, 77%; (g) CuI (0.1 equiv), K2CO3 (2.0 equiv), P(o-Tol)3 (0.2 equiv), phenyl bromoacetylene (1.3 equiv), EtOH, 100°C, 51%; (h) p-TsOH (1.0 equiv), THF/MeOH, RT, 95%; (i) MsCl (3.0 equiv), TEA (3.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0°C to RT, 75%; (j) KCN (2.0 equiv), DMSO, 90°C, 76%; (k) p-TsOH (1.0 equiv), THF/MeOH, RT, 74%. DHP = 3,4-Dihydro-2H-pyran, DMP = Dess-Martin Periodinane, p-TsOH = p-Toluenesulfonic acid, TEA = triethylamine, P(o-Tol)3 = tri(o-tolyl)phosphine, MsCl = methanesulfonyl chloride. CN: cyano; A: alkyne; PhA: phenyl-alkyne; PhDY: phenyl-diyne; Chol: cholesterol.
Figure 2Raman spectral analysis of tagged cholesterol and SRS detection of PhDY-Chol.
(a) Raman spectra of 50 mM tagged cholesterols in cyclohexanone (solvent). Spectral intensity was normalized by C = O vibration band at 1,714 cm−1. Spectral acquisition time: 10 s. (b) Plot of relative intensity of Raman tags versus solvent and Raman shifts of tagged cholesterols. Based on the molar concentration of the molecules (50 mM) and the solvent (9.7 M), the Raman cross section of C≡C from A-Chol, PhA-Chol, and PhDY-Chol are 6 times, 15 times, and 88 times larger than the C = O band from the solvent, respectively. CN: cyano; A: alkyne; PhA: phenyl-alkyne; PhDY: phenyl-diyne; Chol: cholesterol. (c) SRS contrast versus concentration plot of PhDY-Chol solutions. 13% contrast was reached at 313 μM and 4% contrast was reached at 156 μM. Image acquisition speed: 200 μs per pixel. Data represents the mean ± SEM in 3 measurements. R2 = 0.996. (d) SRS contrast versus concentration plot of PhDY-Chol solutions using chirped femtosecond lasers with spectral focusing approach. 14% contrast was reached at 31 μM. Image acquisition speed: 200 μs per pixel. Data represents the mean ± SEM in 3 measurements. R2 = 0.980. Contrast was defined as (S − B)/B. S: SRS signal; B: background.
Figure 3SRS images of PhDY-Chol in live CHO cells and blockage of PhDY-Chol storage into LDs via ACAT-1 inhibition.
(a) SRS images of live CHO cells treated with PhDY-Chol (50 μM) for 16 h. C≡C vibrational mode at 2,254 cm−1 was used for PhDY-Chol, and C–H vibrational mode at 2,885 cm−1 was used for C–H-rich lipid structures. Lasers were also tuned away to 2,099 cm−1 to show specificity of PhDY-Chol signal inside the cells. PhDY-Chol was found to accumulate in LDs (arrows). Image acquisition speed: 10 μs per pixel for 512 × 512 pixels. Scalar bar: 10 μm. (b) Schematic graph showing the hypothesis of PhDY-Chol metabolism inside the cells. ACAT-1: Acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase. (c) SRS images of PhDY-Chol in CHO cells and ACAT-1 inhibited CHO cells by avasimibe treatment. As shown in circles, PhDY-Chol was stored in LDs in CHO cells, but not in avasimibe treated CHO cells. Image acquisition speed: 100 μs per pixel for 400 × 400 pixels. Scalar bar: 10 μm. Intensity bars in (a) and (c) show the ΔI/I of the SRS image. (d) Quantification of PhDY-rich and BODIPY-rich LDs in CHO cells before and after ACAT-1 inhibition. The number of the LDs was normalized by the control group (n = 7). Error bars represent standard deviation. *: p < 0.05. (e) TPEF images of BODIPY-cholesterol and SRS images C–H-rich structures in CHO cells and ACAT-1 inhibited CHO cells. As shown in circles, BODIPY-cholesterol showed no difference between the two groups. Scalar bar: 10 μm.
Figure 4Restored cholesterol transport in M12 cells treated with HPβCD.
TPEF images of filipin and SRS images PhDY-Chol in (a) PhDY-Chol-loaded M12 cells, and (b) the same cells treated with HPβCD (500 μM) for 30 h. Arrows indicate PhDY-rich area labeled by filipin before treatment (non-esterified PhDY-Chol), and arrow heads indicate PhDY-rich area not labeled by filipin after treatment (esterified PhDY-Chol). Green intensity bar shows the ΔI/I value of the SRS image; red intensity bar represents the relative intensity of fluorescence. Image acquisition speed: 100 μs per pixel for 400 × 400 pixels. Scalar bar: 10 μm. (c) Quantification of PhDY-rich area in the cells before and after HPβCD treatment (n = 7). Error bars represent standard deviation. *: p < 0.05. (d) TPEF images of BODIPY and SRS images of PhDY-Chol in M12 cells treated with or without HPβCD (500 μM) for 30 h. Arrow heads indicate LDs without PhDY-Chol before treatment, and arrows indicate LDs with PhDY-Chol after treatment. Green intensity bar shows the ΔI/I value of the SRS image; red intensity bar represents the relative intensity of fluorescence. Image acquisition speed: 100 μs per pixel for 400 × 400 pixels. Scalar bar: 10 μm. (e) Quantification of PhDY-rich LDs in the cells before and after HPβCD treatment (n = 7). Error bars represent standard deviation. **: p < 0.005.
Figure 5SRS imaging of PhDY-Chol visualizes compartments of cholesterol storage in live C. elegans.
(a) SRS images of live wildtype and ChUP-1 deleted C. elegans fed with PhDY-Chol (500 μM) for 3 days. Arrows indicate PhDY-rich particles in the intestine. Image acquisition speed: 40 μs per pixel for 400 × 400 pixels. Scalar bar: 10 μm. (b) TPEF and SRS images of live hjIs9 [ges-1p::glo-1::GFP + unc-119(+)] worm fed with PhDY-Chol (500 μM) for 3 days. Arrows indicate the PhDY-rich particles in LROs. Image acquisition speed: 40 μs per pixel for 400 × 400 pixels. Scalar bar: 10 μm.