Literature DB >> 25608758

The evaluation of reliability and contribution of frozen section pathology to staging endometrioid adenocarcinomas.

Pinar Karabagli1, Serdar Ugras, Burcu Sanal Yilmaz, Cetin Celik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of intraoperative pathological findings, compared to permanent section (PS) and to understand contributions of frozen section (FS) to final staging in patients with endometrioid carcinomas.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 79 patients undergoing intraoperative FS and with endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Intraoperative pathological findings were compared with final results as to grade, depth of myometrial invasion (MI), cervical involvement, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and stage. We also analyzed whether staging procedures like pelvic or para-aortic lymph node metastasis, peritoneal cytology and extension beyond of uterus were related to FS findings. Staging was based on the FIGO 2009.
RESULTS: FS results were agreement in 89.9 % for grade, 88.6 % for depth of MI, 100 % for cervical invasion, and 92.4 % for LVSI, compared with PS. On FS, 12, 16.6 and 44.4 % of specimens in stages of IA, IB and II became upstaged in final pathology, respectively. Of 79 cases, 5 (6.3 %) were upstaged to IIIC1, and 3 (3.8 %) were upstaged to IIIC2 because of lymph node metastasis. A significant relationship was detected between lymph node metastasis, and FS grades (p = 0.001), LVSI (p = 0.000), cervical invasion (p = 0.006) and MI (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: We consider that intraoperative FS is a useful procedure to identify poor prognostic pathological factors. While grading, depth of MI, cervical stromal invasion and LVSI on FS are significant in predicting lymph node metastasis, the existence of cervical stromal invasion and LVSI should be considered more effective parameters in the identification of metastatic endometrial cancer risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25608758     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3621-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

1.  Predictive Score of Nodal Involvement in Endometrial Cancer Patients: A Large Multicentre Series.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Giulio Sozzi; Andrea Rosati; Stefano Restaino; Giulia Gambino; Alessandra Cianciolo; Marcello Ceccaroni; Stefano Uccella; Massimo Franchi; Vito Chiantera; Giovanni Scambia; Francesco Fanfani; Roberto Berretta
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Preoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative frozen sections for predicting the tumor grade in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Tomohito Tanaka; Yoshito Terai; Satoe Fujiwara; Yoshimichi Tanaka; Hiroshi Sasaki; Satoshi Tsunetoh; Kazuhiro Yamamoto; Takashi Yamada; Yoshifumi Narumi; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-11-27

3.  A nomogram prediction model for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Zhiling Wang; Shuo Zhang; Yifei Ma; Wenhui Li; Jiguang Tian; Ting Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Prediction of lymphovascular space invasion in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sang Il Kim; Joo Hee Yoon; Sung Jong Lee; Min Jong Song; Jin Hwi Kim; Hae Nam Lee; Gyul Jung; Ji Geun Yoo
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Diagnostic performance of intraoperative assessment in grade 2 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Antonio Bandala-Jacques; David Cantú-de-León; Delia Pérez-Montiel; Rosa A Salcedo-Hernández; Diddier Prada; Aarón González-Enciso; Arely Gonzalez-Valdés; Salim Abraham Barquet-Muñoz
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.