Literature DB >> 25608581

Molecular and phenotypic characterization of human amniotic fluid-derived cells: a morphological and proteomic approach.

Caterina Pipino1,2,3, Laura Pierdomenico2,3,4, Pamela Di Tomo1,2,3, Fabrizio Di Giuseppe1,2,3, Eleonora Cianci1,2,3, Iolanda D'Alimonte1,3, Caterina Morabito2,3,5, Lucia Centurione3,4, Ivana Antonucci3,6, Maria A Mariggiò2,3,5, Roberta Di Pietro3,4, Renata Ciccarelli1,3, Marco Marchisio2,3,4, Mario Romano1,2,3, Stefania Angelucci1,2,3, Assunta Pandolfi1,2,3.   

Abstract

Mesenchymal Stem Cells derived from Amniotic Fluid (AFMSCs) are multipotent cells of great interest for regenerative medicine. Two predominant cell types, that is, Epithelial-like (E-like) and Fibroblast-like (F-like), have been previously detected in the amniotic fluid (AF). In this study, we examined the AF from 12 donors and observed the prevalence of the E-like phenotype in 5, whereas the F-like morphology was predominant in 7 samples. These phenotypes showed slight differences in membrane markers, with higher CD90 and lower Sox2 and SSEA-4 expression in F-like than in E-like cells; whereas CD326 was expressed only in the E-like phenotype. They did not show any significant differences in osteogenic, adipogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. Proteomic analysis revealed that samples with a predominant E-like phenotype (HC1) showed a different profile than those with a predominant F-like phenotype (HC2). Twenty-five and eighteen protein spots were differentially expressed in HC1 and HC2 classes, respectively. Of these, 17 from HC1 and 4 from HC2 were identified by mass spectrometry. Protein-interaction networks for both phenotypes showed strong interactions between specific AFMSC proteins and molecular chaperones, such as preproteasomes and mature proteasomes, both of which are important for cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. Collectively, our results provide evidence that, regardless of differences in protein profiling, the prevalence of E-like or F-like cells in AF does not affect the differentiation capacity of AFMSC preparations. This may be valuable information with a view to the therapeutic use of AFMSCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25608581     DOI: 10.1089/scd.2014.0453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  8 in total

Review 1.  Amniotic fluid cells: current progress and emerging challenges in renal regeneration.

Authors:  Stefano Da Sacco; Laura Perin; Sargis Sedrakyan
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Donor age and long-term culture do not negatively influence the stem potential of limbal fibroblast-like stem cells.

Authors:  Laura Tomasello; Rosa Musso; Giovanni Cillino; Maria Pitrone; Giuseppe Pizzolanti; Antonina Coppola; Walter Arancio; Gianluca Di Cara; Ida Pucci-Minafra; Salvatore Cillino; Carla Giordano
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 3.  Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells: A Novel Source for Modeling of Human Genetic Diseases.

Authors:  Ivana Antonucci; Martina Provenzano; Melissa Rodrigues; Andrea Pantalone; Vincenzo Salini; Patrizia Ballerini; Cesar V Borlongan; Liborio Stuppia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Restoring the quantity and quality of elderly human mesenchymal stem cells for autologous cell-based therapies.

Authors:  Travis J Block; Milos Marinkovic; Olivia N Tran; Aaron O Gonzalez; Amanda Marshall; David D Dean; Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 5.  Amniotic fluid stem cell models: A tool for filling the gaps in knowledge for human genetic diseases.

Authors:  Ivana Antonucci; Marci G Crowley; Liborio Stuppia
Journal:  Brain Circ       Date:  2017-10-12

Review 6.  Molecular Mechanisms Contributing to Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Aging.

Authors:  Simona Neri; Rosa Maria Borzì
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-02-21

Review 7.  Small Extracellular Vesicles from Human Amniotic Fluid Samples as Promising Theranostics.

Authors:  Ambra Costa; Rodolfo Quarto; Sveva Bollini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Neuroprotective effects of human amniotic fluid stem cells-derived secretome in an ischemia/reperfusion model.

Authors:  Vanessa Castelli; Ivana Antonucci; Michele d'Angelo; Alessandra Tessitore; Veronica Zelli; Elisabetta Benedetti; Claudio Ferri; Giovambattista Desideri; Cesar Borlongan; Liborio Stuppia; Annamaria Cimini
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 6.940

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.