Literature DB >> 25608139

Shock in the first 24 h of intensive care unit stay: observational study of protocol-based fluid management.

Kay Choong See1, Amartya Mukhopadhyay, Samuel Chuan-Xian Lau, Sandra Ming-Yien Tan, Tow Keang Lim, Jason Phua.   

Abstract

Precision in fluid management for shock could lead to better clinical outcomes. We evaluated the association of protocol-based fluid management with intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality. We performed an observational study of mechanically ventilated patients admitted directly from our emergency department to the ICU from August 2011 to December 2013, who had circulatory shock in the first 24 h of ICU stay (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg at ICU admission or lactate >4 mmol/L). Patients with onset of shock beyond 24 h of ICU stay were excluded. Protocol-based fluid management required close physician-nurse cooperation and computerized documentation, checking for fluid response (≥10% arterial pulse pressure or stroke volume increase after two consecutive 250-mL crystalloid boluses), and fluid loading with repeated 500-mL boluses until fluid response became negative. Six hundred twelve mechanically ventilated patients with shock (mean [±SD] age, 63.0 years [16.5]; 252 or 41.2% females; mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, 30.2 [8.8]) were studied. The fluid management protocol was used 455 times for 242 patients (39.5% of 612 patients) within the first 24 h of ICU stay, with 244 (53.6% of 455) positive responses. Adjusted for age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, comorbidity, and admission year, protocol use was associated with reduced ICU mortality (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.94; P = 0.025) but not hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.23; P = 0.369). Among mechanically ventilated patients with shock within the first 24 h of ICU stay, about half had positive fluid responses. Adherence to protocol-based fluid management was associated with improved ICU survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25608139     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  4 in total

1.  Management of circulatory shock and hypotension.

Authors:  Kay Choong See
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  Management of sepsis in acute care.

Authors:  Kay Choong See
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.331

3.  Frequency and prognostic impact of basic critical care echocardiography abnormalities in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Kay Choong See; Jeffrey Ng; Wen Ting Siow; Venetia Ong; Jason Phua
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 4.  Targeting urine output and 30-day mortality in goal-directed therapy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Esther N van der Zee; Mohamud Egal; Diederik Gommers; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.