Thomas W Conlon1, Adam S Himebauch, Julie C Fitzgerald, Aaron E Chen, Anthony J Dean, Nova Panebianco, Kassa Darge, Meryl S Cohen, William J Greeley, Robert A Berg, Akira Nishisaki. 1. 1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 2Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3Department of Emergency Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 4Department of Emergency Medicine, The Hospital of The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 5Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 6Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and describe the process of implementing a pediatric critical care bedside ultrasound program in a large academic PICU and to evaluate the impact of bedside ultrasound on clinical management. DESIGN: Retrospective case series, description of program implementation. SETTING: Single-center quaternary noncardiac PICU in a children's hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients from January 22, 2012, to July 22, 2012, with bedside ultrasounds performed and interpreted by pediatric critical care practitioners. INTERVENTIONS: A pediatric critical care bedside ultrasound program consisting of a 2-day immersive course followed by clinical performance with internal quality assurance review was implemented. Studies performed in the PICU following training were documented and reviewed against reference standards including subspecialist-performed ultrasound or clinical response. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen critical care faculties and eight fellows recorded 201 bedside ultrasound studies over 6 months in defined core applications: 57 procedural (28%), 76 hemodynamic (38%), 35 thoracic (17%), and 33 abdominal (16%). A quality assurance review identified 23 studies (16% of all nonprocedural studies) as critical (affected clinical management or gave valuable information). Forty-eight percent of those studies (11/23) were within the hemodynamic core. The proportion of critical studies were not significantly different across the applications (hemodynamic, 11/76 [15%] vs thoracic and abdominal, 12/68 [18%]; p = 0.65). Examples of critical studies include evidence of tamponade secondary to pleural effusions, identification of pulmonary hypertension, hemodynamic assessment before tracheal intubation, recognition of hypovolemia and systemic vascular resistance abnormalities, determination of pneumothorax, location of chest tube and urinary catheter, and differentiation of pleural fluid from pulmonary consolidation. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a critical care bedside ultrasound program for critical care providers in a large academic PICU is feasible. Bedside ultrasound evaluation and interpretation by intensivists affected the management of critically ill children.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and describe the process of implementing a pediatric critical care bedside ultrasound program in a large academic PICU and to evaluate the impact of bedside ultrasound on clinical management. DESIGN: Retrospective case series, description of program implementation. SETTING: Single-center quaternary noncardiac PICU in a children's hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients from January 22, 2012, to July 22, 2012, with bedside ultrasounds performed and interpreted by pediatric critical care practitioners. INTERVENTIONS: A pediatric critical care bedside ultrasound program consisting of a 2-day immersive course followed by clinical performance with internal quality assurance review was implemented. Studies performed in the PICU following training were documented and reviewed against reference standards including subspecialist-performed ultrasound or clinical response. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen critical care faculties and eight fellows recorded 201 bedside ultrasound studies over 6 months in defined core applications: 57 procedural (28%), 76 hemodynamic (38%), 35 thoracic (17%), and 33 abdominal (16%). A quality assurance review identified 23 studies (16% of all nonprocedural studies) as critical (affected clinical management or gave valuable information). Forty-eight percent of those studies (11/23) were within the hemodynamic core. The proportion of critical studies were not significantly different across the applications (hemodynamic, 11/76 [15%] vs thoracic and abdominal, 12/68 [18%]; p = 0.65). Examples of critical studies include evidence of tamponade secondary to pleural effusions, identification of pulmonary hypertension, hemodynamic assessment before tracheal intubation, recognition of hypovolemia and systemic vascular resistance abnormalities, determination of pneumothorax, location of chest tube and urinary catheter, and differentiation of pleural fluid from pulmonary consolidation. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a critical care bedside ultrasound program for critical care providers in a large academic PICU is feasible. Bedside ultrasound evaluation and interpretation by intensivists affected the management of critically ill children.
Authors: Ryan L DeSanti; Eileen A Cowan; Pierre D Kory; Michael R Lasarev; Jessica Schmidt; Awni M Al-Subu Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Frances M Russell; Audrey Herbert; Bita Zakeri; Mary Blaha; Robinson M Ferre; Elisa J Sarmiento; Paul M Wallach Journal: Cureus Date: 2020-12-01
Authors: Savvas Andronikou; Hansel J Otero; Sabine Belard; Charlotte Carina Heuvelings; Lisa C Ruby; Martin Peter Grobusch Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-09-24
Authors: Elsa A van Wassenaer; Joost G Daams; Marc A Benninga; Karen Rosendahl; Bart G P Koot; Samuel Stafrace; Owen J Arthurs; Rick R van Rijn Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-04-10
Authors: Yogen Singh; Cecile Tissot; María V Fraga; Nadya Yousef; Rafael Gonzalez Cortes; Jorge Lopez; Joan Sanchez-de-Toledo; Joe Brierley; Juan Mayordomo Colunga; Dusan Raffaj; Eduardo Da Cruz; Philippe Durand; Peter Kenderessy; Hans-Joerg Lang; Akira Nishisaki; Martin C Kneyber; Pierre Tissieres; Thomas W Conlon; Daniele De Luca Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 9.097