Literature DB >> 25607628

CEUS Time Intensity Curves in the Differentiation Between Leydig Cell Carcinoma and Seminoma: A Multicenter Study.

F M Drudi, M Valentino1, M Bertolotto2, F Malpassini3, F Maghella3, V Cantisani3, M Liberatore3, C De Felice4, F D'Ambrosio3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) is the main imaging technique in the assessment of testicular masses, as it has proved to be highly accurate in the visualization of these pathologies. Identification of a Leydig cell tumor is essential since the lesion is benign in 90% of cases. The aim of this multicenter study is to assess the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating Leydig cell tumors from seminoma using qualitative and quantitative features.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2011 to December 2013, 31 patients (mean age: 34 years; range: 25 - 52) were recruited for this prospective study. Three of them were monorchid. Therefore, a total of 59 testicles were assessed. All patients underwent grayscale US, color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), CEUS and orchiectomy. The paired one-tailed Student's t-test was carried out to differentiate between Leydig cell tumors and seminomas.
RESULTS: 31 lesions suspicious for malignancy were hypoechoic on grayscale US while they did not show a typical pattern on CDUS. CEUS qualitative analysis, based on contrast enhancement pattern, during the arterial and venous phases, did not allow discrimination of Leydig cell tumors from seminoma. Quantitative analysis of time-intensity curves (TICs) demonstrated that only three parameters presented statistical significance, i. e. wash-in rate (WiR) p = 0.014, peak enhancement (PE) p = 0.001 and time to peak (TTP) p = 0.003.
CONCLUSION: The vascular bed of a Leydig cell tumor is wider and the blood flow velocity is higher than that of a seminoma due to more regular neovascularization. In contrast, a seminoma presents large areas of necrosis due to irregular neovascularization. This explains the different PE and WiR values. Further studies involving larger patient populations are mandatory to confirm these encouraging preliminary results. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25607628     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1398841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  12 in total

Review 1.  [CEUS-Use in testicular pathologies].

Authors:  J Marcon; M Trottmann; C G Stief; D A Clevert
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Diagnostic imaging and CEUS findings in a rare case of Desmoid-type fibromatosis. A case report.

Authors:  Massimo Valentino; Mauro Liberatore; Fabrizio Maghella; Valeria De Soccio; Carlo De Felice; Daniela Messineo; Francesco Maria Drudi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-03-21

Review 3.  Imaging of Pediatric Testicular and Para-Testicular Tumors: A Pictural Review.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Hermann; Aurore L'Herminé-Coulomb; Sabine Irtan; Georges Audry; Liesbeth Cardoen; Hervé J Brisse; Saskia Vande Perre; Hubert Ducou Le Pointe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the characterisation of small, non-palpable solid testicular tumours.

Authors:  Lucia Manganaro; Matteo Saldari; Carlotta Pozza; Valeria Vinci; Daniele Gianfrilli; Ermanno Greco; Giorgio Franco; Maria Eleonora Sergi; Michele Scialpi; Carlo Catalano; Andrea M Isidori
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Efficacy of ultrasound-guided testicle-sparing surgery for small testicular masses.

Authors:  Lucio Dell'Atti
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2015-06-23

Review 6.  [Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of testicular tumours].

Authors:  G Lock
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Quantitative, noninvasive assessment of intra- and extraocular perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and its clinical applicability in healthy dogs.

Authors:  Klaas-Ole Blohm; Katharina M Hittmair; Alexander Tichy; Barbara Nell
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-17       Impact factor: 1.644

Review 8.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the small organs in children.

Authors:  Maciej Piskunowicz; Susan J Back; Kassa Darge; Paul D Humphries; Jörg Jüngert; Damjana Ključevšek; Norbert Lorenz; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Judy H Squires; Dean Y Huang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-08

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound as a valuable imaging modality for characterizing testicular lesions.

Authors:  Jie Yu; Xin-Hui Jiang; Lian-Fang Du; Min Bai; Zhao-Jun Li; Qiu-Sheng Shi; Qi Jiang; Fan Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in testicular diseases: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Marta Tenuta; Franz Sesti; Ilaria Bonaventura; Paola Mazzotta; Riccardo Pofi; Daniele Gianfrilli; Carlotta Pozza
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.