In the last few years, great attention has been given to the composition of the fluids
that are administered to critically illpatients.( In particular, the
amount of Na+ and Cl- is of paramount relevance because these two
electrolytes are major determinants of the strong ion difference (SID) in the blood,
which is the most important variable in the regulation of metabolic acid-base
homeostasis, according to the quantitative physicochemical approach.(
The concern about fluid electrolyte composition is justifiable because iatrogenic,
low-SID acidosis may be the result of administration of high volumes of unbalanced
solutions, such as normal saline.(
In an attempt to minimize this problem, certain balanced solutions were developed, with
the advantage of being more neutral in terms of acid-base equilibrium.(It is known, however, that many other variables have a direct influence on the final
concentrations of these electrolytes in the blood. One of these variables is certainly
the concentrations of these same electrolytes in the urine, the main fluid responsible
for the excretion of Na+ and Cl-.( Unfortunately, the attention given to urinary
electrolyte composition in daily practice is far from ideal. The aim of this commentary
is to present why we think that urine biochemistry evaluation must be part of daily
practice in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Beyond fluid balance in acute kidney injury: focus on Na+ and
Cl- overload
In an overly simplistic view, intensivists are usually worried about the amount of
fluids given to their patients and concomitant fluid elimination, of which urine
output is generally the most relevant for the fluid balance calculation. The
rationale is that fluid balance is a synonym of volume balance. Volume overload is
one of the major concerns in established acute kidney injury (AKI), and it seems to
be of prognostic relevance.(
However, fluid balance and its importance in AKI prognosis are matters not only of
volume overload but also of Na+ and Cl- overload. If much
attention is now being given to the electrolyte composition of the fluids that enter
patients, why is the same attention not being given to the electrolyte composition of
the fluids that leave patients? In practical terms, 2 liters of normal saline does
not have the same physiological impact as 2 liters of lactated Ringer’s solution or
5% dextrose. Hence, 2 liters of urine with high [Na+] and
[Cl-] is not the same as 2 liters of urine with low
concentrations of these electrolytes. We must not interpret these situations merely
as 2 liters of fluids entering and leaving the patient. Equally important, the
urinary SID is a major determinant of acid-base homeostasis,( so acid-base
understanding and management must include both urine volume and urinary electrolyte
composition.
Avid Na+-retaining state: early and remaining sign of acute kidney
injury
Daily assessment of urine biochemistry, even in spot samples, has led us to observe
that urine output and urinary [Na+] and
[Cl-] usually change in the same direction, decreasing
together, at least in the early stages of AKI development. This phenomenon has
already been experimentally demonstrated.( We recently suggested that AKI development is characterized
by decreases in both urinary [Na+] and
[Cl-], which may occur before significant decreases in
urine output or increases in serum creatinine.( Persistent AKI, usually interpreted as structural AKI, is
most often characterized by a persistent incapacity to excrete Na+ and
Cl-. This incapacity is the result of a combination of low filtration
and avid reabsorption (the old “pre-renal” AKI), which continue until the advanced
stages of AKI.( Hence, patients
with AKI have an early risk of Na+ and Cl- overload. Our group
has also suggested that during AKI recovery, certain patients recover urine output
well before Na+ excretion recovery,( i.e., the urinary volume is adequate, but there is still a
compromised natriuretic capacity. This phenomenon has led to the concept of
“unbalanced urine”, which occurs when the problem is not only in the total amount of
diuresis but also in its electrolyte composition. A theoretically adequate urine
output with low/decreasing [Na+] and
[Cl-], especially in the context of fluid resuscitation
(high Na+ and Cl- input), may be a sign of “unbalanced urine”
and a certain degree of renal impairment. Natriuretic capacity seems to be related to
the degree of a systemic inflammatory response.( We have also
observed that the ability to excrete large concentrations of Na+ in urine,
defined here as concentrations above its equivalent in the blood, is a nearly
exclusive characteristic of patients with normal or improving renal
function.(It is noteworthy that Na+ and Cl- overload is not always
obvious based solely in their serum concentrations. Na+ overload may be
present with hypernatremia, hyponatremia or even normonatremia. Thus, urine must be
evaluated in terms of not only quantity but also “quality” (composition),( in the same way that we evaluate the
fluids that are being infused.
Diuretic treatment and natriuretic efficiency
Urinary electrolyte measurement also has great potential for the efficient monitoring
of diuretic treatment. It is common practice to evaluate only the urinary volume
after diuretic administration and the repercussions in serum electrolyte
concentrations. There is a gap in this protocol, which relates to determining to what
extent negative Na+ and Cl- balances are being reached, in
addition to assessing negative volume balance. This information is very relevant when
treating, for example, edema formation. An insufficient natriuretic response to
diuretics may predict worsening renal function.(In conclusion, AKI in the ICU is most often an avid Na+- and
Cl--retaining state. Additional studies are necessary to optimize the
information that we can obtain from urine, which may be very useful for proper AKI
diagnosis and management. Na+ and Cl- overload may be as
important as volume overload in AKI prognosis. A new focus on urine biochemistry will
most likely make it again useful in daily ICU practice.
Authors: Fabio D Masevicius; Graciela Tuhay; María C Pein; Elizabeth Ventrice; Arnaldo Dubin Journal: Crit Care Resusc Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Bertrand Guidet; Neil Soni; Giorgio Della Rocca; Sibylle Kozek; Benoît Vallet; Djillali Annane; Mike James Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 9.097