Paolo Arrigoni1, Vincenza Ragone1, Riccardo D'Ambrosi1, Patrick Denard2, Filippo Randelli1, Giuseppe Banfi3, Paolo Cabitza4, Pietro Randelli4. 1. IRCCS Policlinico San Donato Hospital, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy. 2. Southern Oregon Orthopaedics, Medford, OR, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy ; IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Milan, Italy. 4. IRCCS Policlinico San Donato Hospital, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy ; Department of Biomedical Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: the purpose of this study was to describe a new test for identifying lesions of the long head of the biceps (LHB) and to evaluate its diagnostic performance in comparison with selected traditional clinical tests. METHODS: one hundred and nine consecutive candidates for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively recruited. The BRF test, which measures biceps resisted flexion strength, was performed with the patient seated (armat the side and elbow flexed at 90°). The patient was asked to maintain maximal resistance for five seconds while strength was assessed with a digital dynamometer. Since the dynamometer expresses a continuous variable in kilograms, the measure was dichotomized using a threshold value (cut-off) value-able to simultaneously maximize the sensitivity and specificity. This cut-off value was derived from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Speed's test and the O'Brien test were also performed. During arthroscopy the presence of LHB pathology was assessed. RESULTS: biceps resisted flexion strength was significantly higher in patients without associated LHB lesions [median (range): 3 kg (0-9.5 kg) versus 0 kg (0-8.5 kg); p< 0.001]. The cut-off level able to simultaneously maximize the sensitivity and specificity of the test was 1.1kg. The area under the ROC curve was 0.745 (p<0.001) for the dichotomic BRF test (dBRF), 0.562 (p=0.3) for the O'Brien test, and 0.602 (p=0.113) for Speed's test. A significant good level of accuracy was achieved only by the dBRF test. Specificity and the positive predictive value were significantly higher for the dBRF test than for Speed's and O'Brien's tests (p<0.02). Age and the dBRF test were both found to be significant predictors of LHB lesions. CONCLUSIONS: the dBRF test showed higher accuracy than traditional clinical tests in diagnosing LHB lesions. This novel test for biceps pathology may be advantageous because it is objective and therefore likely reproducible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Development of diagnostic test on basis of consecutive patients (with universally applied reference "gold" standard).
PURPOSE: the purpose of this study was to describe a new test for identifying lesions of the long head of the biceps (LHB) and to evaluate its diagnostic performance in comparison with selected traditional clinical tests. METHODS: one hundred and nine consecutive candidates for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively recruited. The BRF test, which measures biceps resisted flexion strength, was performed with the patient seated (armat the side and elbow flexed at 90°). The patient was asked to maintain maximal resistance for five seconds while strength was assessed with a digital dynamometer. Since the dynamometer expresses a continuous variable in kilograms, the measure was dichotomized using a threshold value (cut-off) value-able to simultaneously maximize the sensitivity and specificity. This cut-off value was derived from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Speed's test and the O'Brien test were also performed. During arthroscopy the presence of LHB pathology was assessed. RESULTS: biceps resisted flexion strength was significantly higher in patients without associated LHB lesions [median (range): 3 kg (0-9.5 kg) versus 0 kg (0-8.5 kg); p< 0.001]. The cut-off level able to simultaneously maximize the sensitivity and specificity of the test was 1.1kg. The area under the ROC curve was 0.745 (p<0.001) for the dichotomic BRF test (dBRF), 0.562 (p=0.3) for the O'Brien test, and 0.602 (p=0.113) for Speed's test. A significant good level of accuracy was achieved only by the dBRF test. Specificity and the positive predictive value were significantly higher for the dBRF test than for Speed's and O'Brien's tests (p<0.02). Age and the dBRF test were both found to be significant predictors of LHB lesions. CONCLUSIONS: the dBRF test showed higher accuracy than traditional clinical tests in diagnosing LHB lesions. This novel test for biceps pathology may be advantageous because it is objective and therefore likely reproducible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Development of diagnostic test on basis of consecutive patients (with universally applied reference "gold" standard).
Entities:
Keywords:
arthroscopy; biceps tendon; diagnostic; shoulder; test
Authors: Harpreet S Gill; George El Rassi; Michael S Bahk; Renan C Castillo; Edward G McFarland Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2007-03-16 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Samuel Rosas; Michael K Krill; Kelms Amoo-Achampong; KiHyun Kwon; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Frank McCormick Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Georg Fieseler; Kevin Laudner; Julia Sendler; Jakob Cornelius; Stephan Schulze; Wolfgang Lehmann; Souhail Hermassi; Karl-Stefan Delank; René Schwesig Journal: JSES Int Date: 2022-02-18