Literature DB >> 25606314

Effect of Laser Treatment on Surface Morphology of Indirect Composite Resin: Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Evaluation.

Mansore Mirzaie1, Nazanin Zeinab Garshasbzadeh1, Esmaeil Yassini1, Sima Shahabi2, Nasim Chiniforush2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the Scanning electron microscope (SEM) of indirect composite conditioned by Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) laser, Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) laser.
METHODS: 18 indirect composite blocks (GC Gradia DA2, Japan) with 15 × 10 × 10 mm dimensions were made. The bonding surface of these blocks were polished, then the samples were divided into six groups as follow: Er:YAG laser with output power of 0.5 W and frequency of 10 Hz, Nd:YAG laser with output power of 0.25, 0.5 W and frequency of 10 Hz, CO2 laser with output power of 0.5 W and frequency of 10 Hz and 5 Hz, and no treatment. Then, the surfaces were evaluated by SEM.
RESULTS: Irregularities were observed in Er:YAG laser samples compared to control group that produced suitable retention for adhesion of cements. Nd:YAG and CO2 lasers showed melting areas.
CONCLUSION: Among different lasers, Er:YAG laser can be used as an alternative technique for surface treatment of indirect composites.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 laser; Er:YAG laser; Nd:YAG lasers

Year:  2013        PMID: 25606314      PMCID: PMC4281981     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 2008-9783


  17 in total

Review 1.  Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations.

Authors:  B Touati; N Aidan
Journal:  J Esthet Dent       Date:  1997

2.  Effects of 15 vs 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology.

Authors:  W W Barkmeier; S E Shaffer; A J Gwinnett
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.440

3.  Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.

Authors:  R Frankenberger; J Sindel; N Krämer; A Petschelt
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

4.  Microtensile bond strength of composite resin to glass-infiltrated alumina composite conditioned with Er,Cr:YSGG laser.

Authors:  Carlos de Paula Eduardo; Marina Stella Bello-Silva; Simone Gonçalves Moretto; Paulo Francisco Cesar; Patricia Moreira de Freitas
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Effect of surface treatments of laboratory-fabricated composites on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement.

Authors:  Carlos José Soares; Marcelo Giannini; Marcelo Tavares de Oliveira; Luis Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo; Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Comparative evaluation of secondary heat treatment and a high intensity light source for the improvement of properties of prosthetic composites.

Authors:  N Tanoue; H Matsumura; M Atsuta
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  Tensile bond strength of a one-bottle adhesive system to indirect composites treated with Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or fluoridric acid.

Authors:  Luiz Henrique Burnett; Rosemary S A Shinkai; Carlos De Paula Eduardo
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations.

Authors:  Camillo D'Arcangelo; Lorenzo Vanini
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Effect of surface treatment on micro shear bond strength of two indirect composites.

Authors:  Maryam Moezizadeh; Zahra Jaberi Ansari; Fatemeh Matin Fard
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-07

10.  Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.

Authors:  Cafer Türkmen; Meral Durkan; Hale Cimilli; Mustafa Öksüz
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.