PURPOSE: A survey on new Malaysian drivers was conducted in Malaysia between year 2006-2009. The objective of this study was to look at the effectiveness of the present computerized visual screening tool and to compare it with the conventional testing method. METHODS: A total of 3717 drivers aged 19±6 years, who had passed in the computerized visual screening, participated in this study. RESULTS: 250 subjects achieved less than 0.3 LogMAR with their best eye and 83 subjects failed the Ishihara Test after retested using the conventional tool. CONCLUSION: These finding showed the computerized visual screening test failed to filter some subjects according to the standards set.
PURPOSE: A survey on new Malaysian drivers was conducted in Malaysia between year 2006-2009. The objective of this study was to look at the effectiveness of the present computerized visual screening tool and to compare it with the conventional testing method. METHODS: A total of 3717 drivers aged 19±6 years, who had passed in the computerized visual screening, participated in this study. RESULTS: 250 subjects achieved less than 0.3 LogMAR with their best eye and 83 subjects failed the Ishihara Test after retested using the conventional tool. CONCLUSION: These finding showed the computerized visual screening test failed to filter some subjects according to the standards set.