Literature DB >> 25606143

White coat effect and white coat hypertension: one and the same?

As Ramli1, N Halmey2, Cl Teng3.   

Abstract

White coat hypertension (WCHT) and white coat effect (WCE) are often thought to be of the same entity. They are in fact different conditions which carry distinctive definitions and prognostic significance. WCHT is diagnosed when office blood pressure (OBP) is ≥140/90 mmHg on at least 3 occasions, while the average daytime or 24-hour blood pressure is <135/85 mmHg. It is common with 15% prevalence in the general population and may account for over 30% of individuals in whom hypertension is diagnosed. Although individuals with WCHT were reported to have a better cardiovascular (CV) prognosis when compared to those with sustained hypertension and masked hypertension; they were also shown to have a greater prevalence of target organ damage (TOD) and metabolic abnormalities than that of normotensive subjects. In contrast, WCE is defined as the transient elevation of OBP induced by the alerting response to a doctor or a nurse. WCE can occur in both normotensive and hypertensive persons; and is not substantially influenced by reassurance and familiarisation. There is conflicting evidence with regards to prognostic significance of WCE, where most data indicated that it does not predict future TOD, CV morbidity or mortality; with some studies showed otherwise. This case scenario aims to solve the diagnostic perplexity with regards to WCHT and WCE, followed by an evidence-based commentary of how to best manage such conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 25606143      PMCID: PMC4170363     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays Fam Physician        ISSN: 1985-2274


  19 in total

1.  White coat effect: semantics, assessment and pathophysiological implications.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Re-examining the efficacy of beta-blockers for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nadia Khan; Finlay A McAlister
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study.

Authors:  Bryan Williams; Peter S Lacy; Simon M Thom; Kennedy Cruickshank; Alice Stanton; David Collier; Alun D Hughes; H Thurston; Michael O'Rourke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Prognostic significance of the white coat effect.

Authors:  P Verdecchia; G Schillaci; C Borgioni; A Ciucci; C Porcellati
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. A meta-analysis of randomized double-blind studies.

Authors:  R E Schmieder; P Martus; A Klingbeil
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  William J Elliott; Peter M Meyer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prognosis of "masked" hypertension and "white-coat" hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study.

Authors:  Takayoshi Ohkubo; Masahiro Kikuya; Hirohito Metoki; Kei Asayama; Taku Obara; Junichiro Hashimoto; Kazuhito Totsune; Haruhisa Hoshi; Hiroshi Satoh; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Relationships between ambulatory white coat effect and left ventricular mass in arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mulè; Emilio Nardi; Santina Cottone; Giuseppe Andronico; Maria Rosa Federico; Giuseppe Piazza; Vito Volpe; Domenico Ferrara; Giovanni Cerasola
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.

Authors:  Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Gareth Beevers; Ulf de Faire; Frej Fyhrquist; Hans Ibsen; Krister Kristiansson; Ole Lederballe-Pedersen; Lars H Lindholm; Markku S Nieminen; Per Omvik; Suzanne Oparil; Hans Wedel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-23       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Clinical significance of blood pressure response triggered by a doctor's visit in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  Masanori Munakata; Yuki Saito; Tohru Nunokawa; Nobuhiko Ito; Shin Fukudo; Kaoru Yoshinaga
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.872

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intrasession Reliability Analysis for Oscillometric Blood Pressure Method Using a Digital Blood Pressure Monitor in Peruvian Population.

Authors:  Sabina Barrios-Fernandez; Eduardo Manuel Sosa-Sánchez; Jorge Carlos-Vivas; Laura Muñoz-Bermejo; Jesús Morenas-Martín; María Dolores Apolo-Arenas; Jose Carmelo Adsuar; Francisco Javier Domínguez-Muñoz
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.