Literature DB >> 25605838

CEREBEL (EGF111438): A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Trastuzumab Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Xavier Pivot1, Alexey Manikhas2, Bogdan Żurawski2, Ewa Chmielowska2, Boguslawa Karaszewska2, Rozenn Allerton2, Stephen Chan2, Alessandra Fabi2, Paolo Bidoli2, Stefania Gori2, Eva Ciruelos2, Magdolna Dank2, Lajos Hornyak2, Sara Margolin2, Arnd Nusch2, Roma Parikh2, Fareha Nagi2, Michelle DeSilvio2, Sergio Santillana2, Ramona F Swaby2, Vladimir Semiglazov2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: CEREBEL compared the incidence of CNS metastases as first site of relapse in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer receiving lapatinib-capecitabine or trastuzumab-capecitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients without baseline CNS metastases were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive lapatinib-capecitabine (lapatinib 1,250 mg per day; capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) per day on days 1 to 14 every 21 days) or trastuzumab-capecitabine (trastuzumab loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks; capecitabine 2,500 mg/m(2) per day on days 1 to 14 every 21 days). The primary end point was incidence of CNS metastases as first site of relapse. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: The study was terminated early with 540 enrolled patients (271 received lapatinib-capecitabine, and 269 received trastuzumab-capecitabine). Incidence of CNS metastases as first site of relapse was 3% (eight of 251 patients) for lapatinib-capecitabine and 5% (12 of 250 patients) for trastuzumab-capecitabine (treatment differences, -1.6%; 95% CI, -2% to 5%; P = .360). PFS and OS were longer with trastuzumab-capecitabine versus lapatinib-capecitabine (hazard ratio [HR] for PFS, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.64; HR for OS, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.64). Serious adverse events were reported in 13% (34 of 269 patients) and 17% (45 of 267 patients) of patients in the lapatinib-capecitabine and trastuzumab-capecitabine arms, respectively.
CONCLUSION: CEREBEL is inconclusive for the primary end point, and no difference was detected between lapatinb-capecitabine and trastuzumab-capecitabine for the incidence of CNS metastases. A better outcome was observed with trastuzumab-capecitabine in the overall population. However, lapatinib-capecitabine efficacy may have been affected by previous exposure to a trastuzumab regimen and/or when treatment was given as first- or second-line therapy in the metastatic setting.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25605838     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.1794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  64 in total

Review 1.  Systemic Therapy for HER2-Positive Central Nervous System Disease: Where We Are and Where Do We Go From Here?

Authors:  Eleonora Teplinsky; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Evaluating Trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2 positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryan Jaques; Sam Xu; Antonios Matsakas
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Provides a Glimmer of Hope for a Daunting Disease.

Authors:  Sara A Hurvitz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Current chemotherapeutic regimens for brain metastases treatment.

Authors:  Joo Yeon Nam; Barbara J O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  Temozolomide in secondary prevention of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases.

Authors:  Alexandra S Zimmer; Seth M Steinberg; Dee Dee Smart; Mark R Gilbert; Terri S Armstrong; Eric Burton; Nicole Houston; Nadia Biassou; Brunilde Gril; Priscilla K Brastianos; Scott Carter; David Lyden; Stanley Lipkowitz; Patricia S Steeg
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 6.  Mystery of the brain metastatic disease in breast cancer patients: improved patient stratification, disease prediction and targeted prevention on the horizon?

Authors:  Jiri Polivka; Milena Kralickova; Jiri Polivka; Christina Kaiser; Walther Kuhn; Olga Golubnitschaja
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 7.  Mechanism, safety and efficacy of three tyrosine kinase inhibitors lapatinib, neratinib and pyrotinib in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun-Cheng Xuhong; Xiao-Wei Qi; Yi Zhang; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 8.  Breast cancer brain metastasis: molecular mechanisms and directions for treatment.

Authors:  Rute M S M Pedrosa; Dana A Mustafa; Riccardo Soffietti; Johan M Kros
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 9.  Systemic therapy of brain metastases: non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma.

Authors:  Marc C Chamberlain; Christina S Baik; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Shailender Bhatia; Laura Q M Chow
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Adjuvant Lapatinib and Trastuzumab for Early Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization Trial.

Authors:  Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Eileen Holmes; José Baselga; Evandro de Azambuja; Amylou C Dueck; Giuseppe Viale; Jo Anne Zujewski; Aron Goldhirsch; Alison Armour; Kathleen I Pritchard; Ann E McCullough; Stella Dolci; Eleanor McFadden; Andrew P Holmes; Liu Tonghua; Holger Eidtmann; Phuong Dinh; Serena Di Cosimo; Nadia Harbeck; Sergei Tjulandin; Young-Hyuck Im; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Véronique Diéras; David W Hillman; Antonio C Wolff; Christian Jackisch; Istvan Lang; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Frances Boyle; Binghe Xu; Henry Gomez; Thomas Suter; Richard D Gelber; Edith A Perez
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.