| Literature DB >> 25605628 |
Y Kurokawa1, M Sasako, T Sano, T Yoshikawa, Y Iwasaki, A Nashimoto, S Ito, A Kurita, J Mizusawa, K Nakamura.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach for treatment of oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) cancer is controversial. A randomized clinical trial (JCOG9502) comparing transhiatal (TH) and left thoracoabdominal (LTA) approaches was stopped after the first interim analysis owing to limited efficacy for LTA resections. Complete 10-year follow-up data are now available.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25605628 PMCID: PMC5024022 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Surg ISSN: 0007-1323 Impact factor: 6.939
Figure 1CONSORT diagram for the JCOG9502 trial. TH, transhiatal; LTA, left thoracoabdominal
Patient characteristics
| TH group ( | LTA group ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 60 (36–75) | 63 (38–75) |
| Sex ratio (M : F) | 71 : 11 | 63 : 22 |
| Borrmann type | ||
| 0–2 | 36 | 37 |
| 3 or 5 | 46 | 48 |
| Siewert classification | ||
| Type II | 52 | 43 |
| Type III | 27 | 36 |
| Non‐OGJ tumour | 3 | 4 |
| Tumour size (cm)*† | 6·2 (2·5–19) | 7·0 (2·0–18) |
| Histological type | ||
| Differentiated | 42 | 43 |
| Undifferentiated | 40 | 40 |
| Clinical tumour category‡§ | ||
| cT2 | 20 | 20 |
| cT3/4 | 62 | 65 |
| Pathological tumour category†‡§ | ||
| pT1b | 2 | 1 |
| pT2a | 10 | 6 |
| pT2b | 24 | 35 |
| pT3 | 39 | 37 |
| pT4 | 7 | 4 |
| Pathological node category†‡ | ||
| pN0 | 14 | 15 |
| pN1 | 24 | 27 |
| pN2 | 30 | 25 |
| pN3/4 | 14 | 16 |
| Pathological node category†§ | ||
| pN0 | 14 | 15 |
| pN1 | 35 | 28 |
| pN2 | 16 | 26 |
| pN3 | 17 | 14 |
| No. of positive nodes*† | 5 (0–53) | 5 (0–52) |
| Histological oesophageal invasion (cm)*† | 1·6 (0–4·5) | 1·2 (0–7·0) |
| Residual tumour | ||
| R0 | 76 | 75 |
| R1/2 | 6 | 10 |
Values are median (range).
Data not available for two patients in the left thoracoabdominal (LTA) group who did not undergo surgical resection owing to M1 disease.
Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma, 12th edition16;
International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification, 6th edition17. TH, transhiatal; OGJ, oesophagogastric junction.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier curves of a overall and b disease‐free survival in all randomized patients by treatment group. TH, transhiatal approach; LTA, left thoracoabdominal approach. a Hazard ratio (HR) 1·42 (95 per cent c.i. 0·98 to 2·05; P = 0·970 and P = 0·060, 1‐ and 2‐sided log rank test respectively); b HR 1·28 (0·87 to 1·89; P = 0·892 and P = 0·215, 1‐ and 2‐sided log rank test respectively)
Sites of first recurrence
| TH group ( | LTA group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lymph nodes | 12 (15) | 19 (22) | 0·235 |
| Peritoneum | 9 (11) | 10 (12) | 1·000 |
| Liver | 8 (10) | 9 (11) | 1·000 |
| Lung | 5 (6) | 5 (6) | 1·000 |
| Pleura | 3 (4) | 1 (1) | 0·362 |
| Other | 5 (6) | 2 (2) | 0·271 |
Values in parentheses are percentages. TH, transhiatal; LTA, left thoracoabdominal.
Fisher's exact test, two‐sided.
Figure 3Forest plot for overall survival in the subgroup analysis. *Data not available for two patients in the left thoracoabdominal (LTA) group who did not undergo surgical resection owing to M1 disease. Hazard ratios are shown with 95 per cent c.i. OGJ, oesophagogastric junction; TH, transhiatal. †Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma, 12th edition16; ‡International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification, 6th edition17
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival in patients with a Siewert type II and b Siewert type III tumours by treatment group. TH, transhiatal approach; LTA, left thoracoabdominal approach. a Hazard ratio (HR) 1·19 (95 per cent c.i. 0·72 to 1·95; P = 0·496, 2‐sided log rank test); b HR 1·67 (0·90 to 3·11; P = 0·102, 2‐sided log rank test)