Literature DB >> 25605606

Conflict of interest disclosure and the polarisation of scientific communities.

Thomas Ploug1, Søren Holm2.   

Abstract

In this article, we introduce and define the notion of polarised scientific communities. We show how polarisation may generate genuine conflicts of interest that require specific efforts to be identified and reported, and suggest a simple heuristic for the identification and reporting of the polarisation of research. We use examples from the debates about breast cancer screening and the prescription of statins to people at low risk of heart disease. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethics; Publication Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25605606     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Informed consent and registry-based research - the case of the Danish circumcision registry.

Authors:  Thomas Ploug; Søren Holm
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Fake facts and alternative truths in medical research.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.