Phosphate addition enhanced soil inorganic nutrients to a large extent in three tropical forests.

Elevated nitrogen (N) deposition may constrain soil phosphorus (P) and base cation availability in tropical forests, for which limited evidence have yet been available. In this study, we reported responses of soil inorganic nutrients to full factorial N and P treatments in three tropical forests different in initial soil N status (N-saturated old-growth forest and two less-N-rich younger forests). Responses of microbial biomass, annual litterfall production and nutrient input were also monitored. Results showed that N treatments decreased soil inorganic nutrients (except N) in all three forests, but the underlying mechanisms varied depending on forests: through inhibition on litter decomposition in the old-growth forest and through Al(3+) replacement of Ca(2+) in the two younger forests. In contrast, besides great elevation in soil available P, P treatments induced 60%, 50%, 26% increases in sum of exchangeable (K(+)+Ca(2+)+Mg(2+)) in the old-growth and the two younger forests, respectively. These positive effects of P were closely related to P-stimulated microbial biomass and litter nutrient input, implying possible stimulation of nutrient return. Our results suggest that N deposition may result in decreases in soil inorganic nutrients (except N) and that P addition can enhance soil inorganic nutrients to support ecosystem processes in these tropical forests.

Soil nutrient availability commonly regulates primary production and other basic ecosystem processes in terrestrial ecosystems. Plants take up essential nutrients from the soil to support metabolism and photosynthesis and return nutrients to soil via litter decomposition1. This cycle can be considered as the “internal nutrient cycle in soil-plant system” (Fig. S1)2. External perturbations to the availabilities of essential nutrients thus will influence nutrient dynamics (pools and fluxes) among different compartments of an ecosystem1234567. n class="Chemical">Nitrogen (N) deposition, as high as 40 kg ha−1 yr−1 inpan> some tropical areas, may be the most prominpan>enpan>t perturbation to some old, highly-productive tropical forest ecosystems89. Inpan>deed, N deposition had beenpan> shown to inpan>crease pan> class="Chemical">nitrogen cycling in tropical regions based on long-term record of tree leaf and ring 15N isotopic signatures5.

n class="Chemical">Nitrogen deposition canpan> inpan>fluenpan>ce ecosystem nutrienpan>t dynamics inpan> a variety of ways by impactinpan>g planpan>ts performanpan>ce anpan>d a couple of ecosystem processes, inpan>cludinpan>g planpan>t nutrienpan>t uptake, photosynthesis, microbial activities, litterfall production anpan>d decomposition (nutrienpan>t minpan>eralization)2. But the direction of N effects (positive or negative) are oftenpan> related with inpan>itial ecosystem N status. For example, inpan> N-rich or evenpan> N-saturated tropical forests, N additions had negative or no effects on photosynthesis of understory species anpan>d litterfall production10111213, despite foliar N enpan>hanpan>cemenpan>t followinpan>g N additions14. N additions had also suppressed microbial biomass anpan>d activities, inpan>hibitinpan>g litter decomposition anpan>d soil respiration101516. These processes inpan> combinpan>ation with potenpan>tial base cation leachinpan>g accompanpan>yinpan>g N-enpan>hanpan>ced pan> class="Chemical">nitrate loss may have resulted in the observed decreases in exchangeable base cation nutrients in the N-rich tropical forest in southern China17. In contrast, in younger or secondary tropical forests that are low in nutrients and less N-rich due to human disturbance, N additions were shown to stimulate litter production18, litter decomposition15, and hence soil P availability18. Thus it is crucial to consider forest initial N status when predicting how ecosystem nutrient dynamics would be affected by additional N input.

The series of detrimental effects of excess N in N-rich ecosystems have been recently connected with N-induced limitation by other nutrients, notably n class="Chemical">phosphorus (P) anpan>d pan> class="Chemical">calcium (Ca) in some temperate forests and Mediterranean ecosystems7192021. In tropical forests, which are usually considered to be P-limited, more attention should be paid on the role of P and its interaction with N in ecosystem processes22232425. Onset of P limitation can be expected when N induced obvious soil acidification and subsequent solubilization of aluminum and iron hydroxides which can stabilize substantial amount of P2627. Moreover, N-induced soil organic matter accumulation may also promote more inorganic P converting to organic P, and thus lower soil P availability and in turn limit plant growth2128. In contrast, P fertilization might alleviate P limitation to plants and microbes and stimulate cascade of ecosystem processes, e.g., plants growth, litterfall production and nutrient mineralization, resulting in improved soil nutrient status19222429. Furthermore, given the coupling nature of biotic N and P requirements, interactions between N and P are also expected725. Nevertheless, so far we had no direct examination of the effects of N and P availabilities and their potential interaction on soil inorganic nutrients in tropical forests with contrasting initial N status.

In the present study, we selected three forests with different land-use history and initial N status to full factorial N × P fertilizations from 2007 at Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve (DHSBR), southern China25. The old-growth forest was suggested to be N-saturated, based on inhibition of litter decomposition and high N leaching after N additions. The other two younger forests (mixed-species dominated and pine dominated) were n class="Chemical">less N-rich. Precipitation inpan>organpan>ic N inpan>put of 34 kg N ha−1 yr−1, anpan>d organpan>ic N inpan>put of 18 kg N ha−1 yr−1 was recorded inpan> the study sites inpan> 200530. Inpan> the presenpan>t study, we reported responses of soil inpan>organpan>ic nutrienpan>ts to 2.5 years of full factorial N anpan>d P treatmenpan>ts (150 kg N or P ha−1 yr−1). We examinpan>ed responses of soil pH, N anpan>d P availability, exchanpan>geable base cations anpan>d pan> class="Chemical">Al3+ in the surface mineral soils. Concomitant microbial biomass carbon (MBC), annual litterfall production and litter nutrient input were also monitored to explore the potential mechanisms. Based on the different initial N status of the three forests, we had three hypotheses: 1) In the old-growth forest, N treatments would reduce the availabilities of P and exchangeable base cations through inhibitive effect of N addition on litter decomposition as shown previously from this experiment16; 2) In the two younger forests, which were suggested to be N-limited based on the positive effects of N on litter decomposition therein15, N additions would increase soil inorganic nutrients by promoting microbial biomass and litter nutrient input, and thus nutrient return; 3) In all three forests, given the rather low soil P availability (< 2 mg kg−1)31, P additions would increase soil inorganic nutrients (N, P and base cations) by stimulating microbial biomass and litter nutrient input, and hence nutrient return.

Results

Old-growth forest vs. the two younger forests control plots

In the control plots, the old-growth forest was lower in pH (Fig. 1a), but higher in soil NO3−-N (Fig. 1c), soil exchangeable base cation nutrients and n class="Chemical">Al3+ (Table S1) thanpan> the two younger forests. Soil pH values inpan> the control plots averaged 3.82, 4.06 anpan>d 3.98 inpan> the old-growth, mixed, anpan>d pinpan>e forests, respectively. Consistenpan>t with the low pH values, exchanpan>geable cation pools of all the three forests were predominpan>ated by pan> class="Chemical">Al3+ (Table S1). Calculated annual litter nutrient input (annual litterfall production × litter concentrations of N, P, K, Ca, Mg; Table 1, S2) of K and Mg were significantly higher in the old-growth forest than in the pine forest (Table 1).

Figure 1

Soil pH (a), concentrations of available P (b), available N (c, NH4+-N and NO3−-N), and ammonium to nitrate ratio (d) in the 0–10 cm soil depth in response to 2.5 years of N and P additions in the three forests.

Bars indicate +1 SE (N = 5). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among the three study forests (One-way ANOVA, Tukey'b test, P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments in each forest (One-way ANOVA, Tukey'b test, P < 0.05).

Table 1

Calculated annual litter nutrient input (ALNI, g m−2 yr−1) following N and P additions in 2009. Calculations were done by timing litterfall production (Fig. 3a) with litter nutrient concentration determined by other studies (Table S2). Different capital letters indicate significant differences in control plots among forests (One-way ANOVA, Tukey's b test, P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments in each forest (One-way ANOVA, Tukey's b test, P < 0.05)

Forests	Treatments	N	P	K	Ca	Mg
Old-growth	Control	8(0.6)b	0.3(0.02)b	1.7(0.1)Ab	1.7(0.1)b	0.8(0.1)Ab
	N	10(0.5)b	0.4(0.04)ab	2.0(0.1)ab	2.0(0.1)ab	1.0(0.1)ab
	P	14(1.1)a	0.5(0.02)a	2.8(0.2)a	2.9(0.2)a	1.4(0.1)a
	N*P	11(0.2)ab	0.4(0.01)ab	2.1(0.1)ab	2.2(0.1)ab	1.1(0.1)ab
Mixed	Control	6(0.5)b	0.2(0.05)b	1.4(0.2)ABb	1.5(0.3)b	0.6(0.1)ABb
	N	7(0.7)b	0.3(0.07)b	1.6(0.3)ab	1.7(0.4)b	0.7(0.2)ab
	P	10(0.9)a	0.4(0.08)a	2.2(0.4)a	2.4(0.4)a	1.0(0.2)a
	N*P	9(1)ab	0.3(0.10)ab	2.0(0.4)ab	2.2(0.5)ab	0.9(0.2)ab
Pine	Control	5(0.8)b	0.1(0.04)b	0.9(0.2)Bb	1.2(0.2)b	0.2(0.1)Bb
	N	5(0.7)b	0.1(0.04)b	1.1(0.1)ab	1.5(0.2)ab	0.2(0.1)b
	P	7(0.8)a	0.2(0.04)a	1.4(0.2)a	1.9(0.2)a	0.3(0.1)a
	N*P	8(1)a	0.2(0.11)a	1.5(0.4)a	2.0(0.6)a	0.3(0.1)a

Effects of N additions

In the old-growth forest, N treatments decreased soil available P by 72% (1.76 n class="Chemical">mg kg−1 inpan> control to 0.49 pan> class="Chemical">mg kg−1 in N addition plots; Fig. 1b), had no effect on pH or any single exchangeable cation species (Fig. 1a; Table S1), but resulted in a 6% decrease in sum of exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+) (One-way ANOVA, LSD test, P < 0.05; Fig. 2). N additions did not affect MBC, annual litterfall production, or annual litter nutrient input (Fig. 3; Table 1) in the old-growth forest.

Figure 2

Sum of exchangeable base cations (K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) in the 0–10 cm soil depth in the N, P or NP treatments relative to control (control = 100%) in the three forests.

Bars indicate ±1 SE (N = 5). “*” indicates significant differences between treatments and controls (One-way ANOVA, LSD test, P < 0.05).

Figure 3

Soil microbial biomass carbon (a) and annual total litterfall production (b) in surface mineral soil from the three forests after 2.5 years of N and P additions.

Bars indicate +1 SE (N = 5). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among the three study forests (One-way ANOVA, Tukey'b test, P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments in each forest (One-way ANOVA, Tukey'b test, P < 0.05).

In the two younger forests, N additions had no effects on soil pH, n class="Chemical">NH4+-N or NO3−-N concenpan>trations, but reduced available P by 80% inpan> the mixed forest (Fig. 1). N additions resulted inpan> elevated soil exchanpan>geable pan> class="Chemical">Al3+ in the mixed forest, but lower exchangeable Ca2+ and sum of exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+) in the pine forest (Fig. 2; Table 2, S1). Neither of MBC, annual litterfall production or litter nutrient input was altered by N treatments in the two younger forests (Fig. 3; Table 1, 2). Linear model analysis showed significantly negatively correlated exchangeable Ca2+ and Al3+ in the mixed and the pine forests (R2 = 0.16; N = 40; P = 0.005; Fig. 4).

Table 2

Fertilization effects on soil chemistry, litterfall production and microbial biomass in the three forests. Values are (treatment mean/control mean) from N, P or NP treatment plots. Two-way ANOVA results are given by *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001

Forests	Old-growth			Mixed			Pine
Treatments	N	P	N*P	N	P	N*P	N	P	N*P
pH (H2O)	0.98	1.02*	1.00	0.99	1.00	0.97	1.00	1.00	0.98
Available P	0.28*	2.47***	1.59	0.13**	1.60**	1.53*	0.67	1.53**	0.79
NH4+-N	1.16	1.27*	1.27	1.13	1.01	1.11	0.91	0.96	0.89
NO3−-N	0.96	0.68**	0.59	0.98	0.76	1.12	0.86	0.90	0.91
(NH4+-N) + (NO3−-N)	1.06	0.98	0.93	1.09	0.94	1.11	0.89	0.95	0.90
(NH4+-N)/(NO3−-N)	1.22	2.11**	2.16	1.17	1.36	1.14	1.07	1.11	1.06
Exchangeable K+	1.00	1.31**	1.23	1.13	2.40***	3.26	0.75	0.98	0.82
Exchangeable Ca2+	0.97	1.26**	1.07	1.05	1.40*	1.31	0.85*	1.27	0.84
Exchangeable Mg2+	0.95	1.19*	1.14	1.03	1.43*	1.19	0.99	1.51*	1.03
Exchangeable Al3+	1.11	1.05	1.00	1.15*	1.09	1.21	0.99	1.13*	1.13
Sum of (K++Ca2++Mg2+)	0.94*	1.60**	1.40**	1.04	1.48**	1.45	0.85**	1.26*	0.86
Total Litterfall Production	1.17	1.66*	1.28***	1.17	1.58*	1.48	1.21	1.55**	1.69
Microbial Biomass Carbon	0.93	1.33*	1.03	1.33	1.32	1.33	0.97	0.93	0.90

Figure 4

Relationship between soil exchangeable Ca2+ and Al3+ with data from the mixed and the pine forests pooled together.

Y = −6.70·X +130.06, R2 = 0.1681, P = 0.005.

Effects of P additions

In the old-growth forest, P additions increased soil pH (Table 2), soil available P (Fig. 1b), soil n class="Chemical">NH4+-N (Fig. 1c), but decreased NO3−-N (Fig. 1c) simultanpan>eously, resultinpan>g inpan> significanpan>tly higher pan> class="Chemical">NH4+-N to NO3−-N ratio (Fig. 1d). All species of soil exchangeable base cations (K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) were improved by P treatments in this forest (Table 2, S1), corresponding to a 60% increase in sum of exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+) (One-way ANOVA, LSD test, P < 0.05; Fig. 2). P additions increased MBC (by 33.1%) and annual litterfall production (by 66.5%) in this forest (One-way ANOVA, Tukey's b test, P < 0.05; Fig. 3). Calculated litter input of all nutrient species (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) were stimulated by P (One-way ANOVA, Tukey's b test, P < 0.05; Table 1). N and P treatments interacted to influence sum of exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+) and annual litterfall production (Two-way ANOVA, P < 0.05; Table 2).

In the two younger forests, P additions increased soil available P by 60% in the mixed forest, and by 53% in the pine forest (Fig. 1b), while having no significant impact on soil pH, n class="Chemical">NH4+-N or NO3−-N concenpan>tration (Fig. 1a, c) inpan> either younger forest. Inpan> the mixed forest, P treatmenpan>ts inpan>creased exchanpan>geable K+, pan> class="Chemical">Ca2+, Mg2+, and sum of exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+) (Fig. 2; Table S1). In the pine forest, P additions increased exchangeable Mg2+, Al3+ and sum of exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+) (Fig. 2; Table S1). N, P interaction only existed on soil available P in the mixed forest (Two-way ANOVA, P < 0.05; Table 2). Microbial biomass carbon of the two younger forests were not affected by P (Fig. 3a). But both annual litterfall production (Two-way ANOVA, P < 0.05; Table 2) and litter input of N, P, K, Ca, Mg (One-way ANOVA, Tukey's b test, P < 0.05; Table 1) were promoted by P treatments.

Discussion

In this study, we examined soil inorganic nutrients (N, P, base cations) in response to N and P treatments in three tropical forests with different initial soil N status. The old-growth forest was suggested to be N-saturated, while the two younger forests were n class="Chemical">less-N-rich. Thus we expected N treatmenpan>ts to have opposite effects on examinpan>ed parameters inpan> the two types of forests (N-saturated vs. pan> class="Chemical">less-N-rich). On the other hand, since all three forests had very low soil available P, we expected P additions to increase soil inorganic nutrients in all three forests through stimulating litter nutrient input and return. It turned out that N additions resulted in decreases in soil inorganic nutrients in all three forests, with varied underlying mechanisms related to forest initial N status. P additions, on the other hand, elevated soil inorganic nutrients in all three forests as expected. We will give discussion on effects of N or P on soil inorganic nutrients separately, in the old-growth forest first, and then in the two younger forests. We also related these response patterns with the different initial N status of the two forest types (N-saturated vs. less-N-rich).

Negative effects of N on soil inorganic nutrients in the N-saturated old-growth forest

Consistent with our first hypothesis, N treatments resulted in decreases in soil available P and exchangeable base cation nutrients in the old-growth forest. N treatments decreased soil available P from 1.7 n class="Chemical">mg kg−1 to 0.45 pan> class="Chemical">mg kg−1; An N-induced 6% loss of sum of exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+) were also observed. Because we failed to observe decreases in soil pH or mobilization of Al3+, thus the modest, but significant decrease in sum of exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+) were unlikely to result from enhanced base cation leaching in this forest. Instead, we focused on the “internal nutrient cycle in soil-plant systems” in this study (Fig. S1) and assumed that atmospheric cation deposition and chemical weathering were identical to all the plots. This enabled us to relate changes in soil exchangeable nutrients to three specified ecosystem processes, including plant nutrient uptake (output), litter nutrient return (input), and nutrient mineralization (input). Plant uptake of nutrients were not likely stimulated by N additions, given the N-saturated status of the old-growth forest15. Indeed, neither tree growth32 (adult trees, seedlings or understory species) nor foliar nutrient concentrations33 were stimulated by N additions in the old-growth forest (results from another ongoing N fertilization experiment in the same forests). On the contrary, declines in foliar Ca, Mg concentrations after 3 years of N treatments were observed for dominant species in the old-growth forest33 (50, 100, 150 kg N ha−1 yr−1). Litter nutrient input were not reduced by N additions, according to the calculated annual litter nutrient input. Thus, this led us to relate the decreases in soil available P and exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+) in the old-growth forest with inhibited nutrient mineralization (reduced input), since negative effects of N addition on litter decomposition and soil respiration were previously observed in the old-growth forest from the other ongoing N fertilization experiment in the same forests1015, and were further confirmed in this N × P interaction experiment16.

Negative effects of N on soil inorganic nutrients in the two less-N-rich younger forests

Contrary to our second hypothesis, in the two younger forests, no increases in inorganic nutrients, but decreases in exchangeable n class="Chemical">Ca2+ anpan>d sum of (K++pan> class="Chemical">Ca2++Mg2+) in the pine forest, and increases in exchangeable Al3+ in the mixed forest were observed following N treatments, all of which can be considered as certain symptoms of soil acidification. In addition, soil exchangeable Ca2+ negatively correlated with exchangeable Al3+ in the two forests combined, suggesting that decreases in exchangeable Ca2+ might be a result of mobilization of Al3+, which subsequently replace Ca2+ from exchangeable sites to be leached34. These N-induced signs of soil acidification for the pine and the mixed forests were not observed from the other ongoing long-term N addition experiment at DHSBR, showing that 26 months of N treatments (50–150 kg N ha−1yr−1) failed to elicit decreases in pH or exchangeable Ca2+, Mg2+, or Al3+ mobilization in either younger forests17, which was attributed to the rather N-limited status of the two younger forests17. The difference between our results and the previous study implied the possibility that base cation leaching might have started to emerge in the two younger forests under the high ambient N deposition30 (34 kg N ha−1 yr−1, wet deposition, inorganic N). The pine forest in our study showed particularly sensitive responses of Ca2+ nutrient to N treatments. This is consistent with other studies in red spruce dominated ecosystems demonstrating pine species to be more prone to Ca deficiencies under high N deposition3435.

Alleviation of P-limitation increases soil inorganic nutrients in all three forests

In line with our third hypothesis, P addition induced great increases in soil available P and exchangeable base cation nutrients (sum of K+, n class="Chemical">Ca2+, pan> class="Chemical">Mg2+, or individual base cation species) in all the three study forests. For soil inorganic N, P additions caused net increase in NH4+-N, but decrease in NO3−-N only in the old-growth forest. These results highlights the role of P on regulating soil nutrient availabilities in these tropical forests. The potential mechanisms were that the positive effects of P on soil inorganic nutrients were manifested via stimulation on microbial biomass and annual litter nutrient input, and hence nutrient return.

In all three forests, we observed up to 147% increases in Bray-I P after P treatments, implying that P-limitation was relieved, and biotic P demand may have been saturated2124. In addition, we determined Bray-I P after 5 years of N and P treatments in July 2011, and found much more increases (up to 31 folds in Bray-I P comparing to the control)31. These demonstrated that continuous P addition (n class="Chemical">NaH2PO4, 150 kg P ha−1yr−1) canpan> saturate sorption sites inpan> these highly weathered soils6. Similar gradual inpan>creases inpan> soil available P after years of P additions (pan> class="Chemical">CaHPO4, 50 kg P ha−1 yr−1) were also detected from an ongoing long-term NPK factorial experiment in lowland tropical forests in Panama (4 years, 50% increase in Bray-I P36; 9 years, 29 folds increases in Mehlich P6).

In the old-growth forest, we suggested that nutrient mineralization and return should have been stimulated by P addition, since n class="Disease">MBC, anpan>nual litterfall production anpan>d litter nutrienpan>t inpan>put were found to inpan>crease followinpan>g P treatmenpan>ts inpan> this forest. P treatmenpan>ts inpan>creased decomposition rates inpan> a Hawaii tropical forests37 anpan>d inpan> a Panpan>ama lowlanpan>d tropical forests3. Inpan> this study, P-inpan>creased soil microbial biomass inpan>dicated that P availability was a limitinpan>g factor for microbial growth inpan> the old-growth forest, consistenpan>t with previous study from the same experimenpan>t showinpan>g stimulation of P on microbial performanpan>ce inpan> this forest22. Inpan> addition, higher fresh fallenpan> litter may temporarily accelerate soil organpan>ic pan> class="Chemical">carbon mineralization (priming effect)38, due to the fact that microbial activities are frequently limited by labile C availability. Thus we suggest that microbial biomass and activities may be increased by both alleviation of P limitation and improved substrate C availability24 in the old-growth forest.

In the old-growth forest, both annual litterfall production and litter nutrient input were elevated by P additions, implying the close relationship between P-induced higher litter nutrient input and increases in soil inorganic nutrients. We examined this potential relationship by doing rough comparison between P-enhanced litter nutrient input (N, P, K, Ca, n class="Chemical">Mg) anpan>d chanpan>ges inpan> soil inpan>organpan>ic nutrienpan>ts (Table S3), anpan>d found that P-inpan>duced higher litter inpan>put of P, K, pan> class="Chemical">Mg approximated the increases in available P and exchangeable K+, Mg2+ (Table S3); However, litter Ca input quantified about one third to half of increases of exchangeable Ca2+ following P additions (Table S3), implying that this speculated P-enhanced nutrient input can't fully explain the observed changes in exchangeable Ca2+. Litter function as substrate for microbial mineralization, apart from root debris15. Litterfall and underlying forests floor in acid forests is a major source of dissolved organic carbon, nutrients and metals39. The release of nutrient cations from these two layers was suggested to be crucial for tree growth40, since these layers can contain as much as 80% of available Ca, Mg and K in soil41. In our old-growth forest, nutrients stored in the litter layer were released within one year15, and litterfall standing biomass approximated that of annual litterfall production42, both resulting from relative fast decomposition. In sum, in the old-growth forest, P-induced higher microbial biomass, litterfall production and litter nutrient input may have jointly contributed to more efficient nutrient mineralization and return, resulting in increases in soil available P and base cation nutrients. For soil inorganic N, we expected it to show changes in concert with other base cations, since they are all released from nutrient mineralization. Consistent with this expectation, there was P-induced increase of soil NH4+-N level in the old-growth forest.

In the two younger forests, P additions did not affect microbial biomass, consistent with previous study showing that P additions affected neither microbial biomass nor community composition22. P was suggested to have a n class="Chemical">less importanpan>t role inpan> the two younger forests thanpan> inpan> the old-growth forest to inpan>fluenpan>ce microbial growth anpan>d performanpan>ce22. Neverthepan> class="Chemical">less, we did observe P-stimulated litterfall production, litter nutrient input. This may imply differential P limitation to plants and microbes in the two younger forests. Comparison between P-driven increases in litter nutrient input (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) and in soil inorganic nutrients (Table S3) showed that in the mixed forest, P-induced higher litter Mg input approximated increases in exchangeable Mg2+, with litter Ca and K input being less than one third of increases in exchangeable pool of each. In the pine forest, P input via litter roughly equaled the increase of soil available P following P additions, suggesting the importance of litter return on soil P nutrient (Table S3). This implied that some unknown processes contributed to the observed increases in exchangeable pools of other base cations. However, we failed to observe similar increases in inorganic N (NH4+-N or NO3−-N) after P additions in the two younger forests as in the old-growth forest. One reason might be P-enhanced biotic utilization of NH4+-N2143, which may have counteracted the potential higher available N (higher NH4+-N resulting from P-stimulated nutrient mineralization) after P additions. The nutrient dynamics following N and P additions in the three study forests need further studies using isotope tracer technique.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated detrimental effects of excess N on soil inorganic nutrients (mainly inn class="Disease">organic P anpan>d exchanpan>geable base cation nutrienpan>ts) of differenpan>t forest types (N-saturated vs. pan> class="Chemical">less-N-rich) with different mechanisms, i.e., likely through N-inhibited litter decomposition in the N-saturated old-growth forest, and with Al3+ mobilization and replacement of Ca2+ in the two younger, less-N-rich tropical forests. Consistent with the low soil P, P additions alleviated P limitation, and increased soil available P and base cation nutrients in all three forests to a large extent, but increased inorganic N (NH4+-N) only in the old-growth forest. These positive effects of P were closely related with P-stimulation on microbial biomass, litterfall production and litter nutrient input. Our results highlights the perturbation role of N deposition on inorganic nutrient availabilities (except N) and cycling, and more importantly, how they can be reversed by P additions in some N-saturated and less-N-rich tropical forests. These results highlight the potential of P on influencing productivities of tropical forests under high N deposition.

Methods

Study site

This study was conducted in Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve (DHSBR, 112°33′E and 23°10′N), which occupies an area of approximately 1200 ha. The reserve is located in the middle part of Guangdong province, southern China. The climate is warm and humid, with annual precipitation of 1927 mm and mean annual temperature of 21.0°C. The soil is lateritic red earth formed from sandstone15. Three forests in this reserve were included in the present study: an old-growth forest as the regional climax type (more than 400 years old) and another two younger forests, a mixed pine/broadleaf forest and a pine forest. These two younger forests both originated from the 1930s clear-cut and subsequent pine plantation with sites badly eroded and degraded15. Widely different intensity and frequency of litter and vegetation harvesting between 1930s to 1998 on these two younger forests determined their different tree species composition, with n class="Species">Pinus massoniana dominpan>ated inpan> the pinpan>e forest anpan>d some broadleaf species together with pan> class="Species">Pinus massoniana co-dominated in the mixed forest. The three forests have similar elevation (50–250 m a.s.l), slope aspect and slope degree15.

Experimental design of nutrient additions

The full factorial N×P manipulation experiment started in February 2007 in the three forests. In each forest, there were four treatments, i.e., control (without N or P additions), +N (150 kg N ha−1 yr−1 as n class="Chemical">NH4NO3), +P (150 kg P ha−1 yr−1 as pan> class="Chemical">NaH2PO4), and +NP (150 kg N ha−1 yr−1 N + 150 kg P ha−1 yr−1), with 5 replicates for each treatment. Plots of 5 × 5 m2 were randomly selected to receive treatments. NH4NO3 and NaH2PO4 solutions were sprayed once every other month to the forest floor with a backpack sprayer starting from February 2007 and continued through August 2009. Fertilizer was weighed and mixed with 5L water for each plot. Each control plot received 5L water without fertilizer25.

Field sampling and chemical analysis

In this study, the 0–10 cm mineral soils were collected in August 2009 from control, and the +N, +P and +NP treatment plots (treated for 2.5 years). In each plot, 3 soil cores (5 cm in diameter) were collected randomly and mixed to one composite sample. Soil samples were then passed through a 2 mm mesh sieve to remove other coarse fragments. One 10 g sub-sample from each composite sample was shaken for 1 hour in 50 ml of 1 mol/L n class="Chemical">KCl, anpan>d filtered; the filtrate was frozen immediately for later anpan>alysis. Extractable pan> class="Chemical">NH4+-N was determined by the indophenol blue method followed by colorimetry30. NO3−-N was determined after cadimium reduction to NO2−-N, followed by sulfanilamide-NAD reaction30. Available P was extracted by acid-ammonium fluoride solution (0.025 mol L−1 HCL + 0.03 mol L−1 NH4F)44. Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was estimated by chloroform fumigation extraction45.

The remained samples were air-dried and used to measure pH (soil : n class="Chemical">water = 1 : 2.5) anpan>d the nutrient contents. Exchanpan>geable elements (K+, pan> class="Chemical">Ca2+, Mg2+) were extracted with 1 mol/L NH4OAC18, and exchangeable Al3+ was extracted with 1 mol/L KCl (soil : solution = 1 : 10)46. All base cations were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, USA).

One litter trap (0.5 m × 0.5 m) with a mesh size of 1 mm was placed randomly in each plot about 0.5 m above the ground surface. The traps were emptied once every month during the year.

Statistical analysis

Data were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and for equality of error variance using Levene's test. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with N and P as the main factors, was performed to test the effects of N and P treatments and potential N × P interactions on soil pH, available N and P, exchangeable base cations and n class="Chemical">Al3+, total litterfall production, anpan>d microbial biomass pan> class="Chemical">carbon in each forest. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's b test was used to test differences of all variables other than sum of exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+) among treatments in each forest, as well as differences among forests (control plots). For sum of exchangeable (K++Ca2++Mg2+), One-way ANOVA with LSD test was adopted to test the difference between N/P treatment plots relative to control. We also used general linear model to analyze relationship between exchangeable Ca2+ and Al3+ in the mixed and pine forests. All analyses were conducted using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) for Windows. Level of significance was set with P < 0.05 unless otherwise stated.

Author Contributions

F.Z. carried out the field experiment and analyzed the data. J.M. designed the experiment. F.Z., X.L. and J.M. proposed the scientific hypothesis. L.L. performed the microbial analysis. All the authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.