Literature DB >> 25605566

Surgical complications after open and laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in a nationwide cohort.

M Wilhelmsen1, M H Møller, S Rosenstock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgery for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is associated with a risk of complications. The frequency and severity of reoperative surgery is poorly described. The aims of the present study were to characterize the frequency, procedure-associated risk and mortality associated with reoperation after surgery for PPU.
METHODS: All patients treated surgically for PPU in Denmark between 2011 and 2013 were included. Baseline and clinical data, including 90-day mortality and detailed information on reoperative surgery, were collected from the Danish Clinical Register of Emergency Surgery. Distribution frequencies of reoperation stratified by type of surgical approach (laparoscopy or open) were reported. The crude and adjusted risk associations between surgical approach and reoperation were assessed by regression analysis and reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95 per cent c.i. Sensitivity analyses were carried out.
RESULTS: A total of 726 patients were included, of whom 238 (32·8 per cent) were treated laparoscopically and 178 (24·5 per cent) had a laparoscopic procedure converted to laparotomy. Overall, 124 (17·1 per cent) of 726 patients underwent reoperation. A persistent leak was the most frequent cause (43 patients, 5·9 per cent), followed by wound dehiscence (34, 4·7 per cent). The crude risk of reoperative surgery was higher in patients who underwent laparotomy and those with procedures converted to open surgery than in patients who had laparoscopic repair: OR 1·98 (95 per cent c.i. 1·19 to 3·27) and 2·36 (1·37 to 4·08) respectively. The difference was confirmed when adjusted for age, surgical delay, co-morbidity and American Society of Anesthesiologists fitness grade. However, the intention-to-treat sensitivity analysis (laparoscopy including conversions) demonstrated no significant difference in risk. The risk of death within 90 days was greater in patients who had reoperation: crude and adjusted OR 1·53 (1·00 to 2·34) and 1·06 (0·65 to 1·72) respectively.
CONCLUSION: Reoperation was necessary in almost one in every five patients operated on for PPU. Laparoscopy was associated with lower risk of reoperation than laparotomy or a converted procedure. However, there was a risk of bias, including confounding by indication.
© 2015 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25605566     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

Review 1.  Perforated peptic ulcer - an update.

Authors:  Kin Tong Chung; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

2.  Surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcers: laparoscopic versus open approach.

Authors:  Victor Vakayil; Brent Bauman; Keaton Joppru; Reema Mallick; Christopher Tignanelli; John Connett; Sayeed Ikramuddin; James V Harmon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Kenneth Thorsen; Ewen M Harrison; Juliane Bingener; Morten H Møller; Michael Ohene-Yeboah; Jon Arne Søreide
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Short-term outcomes after emergency surgery for complicated peptic ulcer disease from the UK National Emergency Laparotomy Audit: a cohort study.

Authors:  Benjamin E Byrne; Michael Bassett; Chris A Rogers; Iain D Anderson; Ian Beckingham; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Comparison of laparoscopic surgery versus traditional laparotomy for the treatment of emergency patients.

Authors:  Ning Cui; Jun Liu; Haiyan Tan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Outcome of endoscopic vacuum therapy for duodenal perforation.

Authors:  Mickael Chevallay; Florian Lorenz; Philippe Bichard; Jean-Louis Frossard; Thomas Schmidt; Tobias Goeser; Christiane Josephine Bruns; Stefan P Mönig; Seung-Hun Chon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Is Laparoscopy a New Paradigm?

Authors:  André Pereira; Hugo Santos Sousa; Diana Gonçalves; Eduardo Lima da Costa; André Costa Pinho; Elisabete Barbosa; José Barbosa
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-05-12

8.  Technique to manage persistent leak from a prepyloric ulcer where a distal gastrectomy is not appropriate.

Authors:  Kirk Bowling; Alison Balcombe; Jaideep Rait; Stuart Andrews
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.