BACKGROUND: The global cancer burden (GCB) is expected to rise significantly during the next few decades with most of the new cancers and cancer-related deaths afflicting the low- to middle-income countries. The ability to tackle this rising GCB requires the presence of an adequately trained surgical oncology workforce, which is dependent on credible training pathways and sustainable certification pipelines. The purpose of this article is to review briefly the training patterns and certification requirements for surgical oncologists globally by sampling representative countries across all regions of the world. METHODS: A thorough literature search was conducted using multiple websites of credible national/global organizations as well as the websites of individual countries. Countries from select regions in the world were included (based on the World Health Organization regions and Human Development Index) in the analysis to determine the prevalent trends in the training of surgical oncologists globally. RESULTS: Several trends and significant differences were noted in the training patterns of surgical oncologists globally. The presence or absence of domestic surgical oncology fellowships had an inverse correlation to the income level of the country. Countries without domestic fellowships usually relied on high-income foreign destinations for their training. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the analysis demonstrated significant variability in training of surgical oncologists globally. Despite the diversity, we noticed some general trends based on which some recommendations were put forth for increasing the global surgical oncology workforce.
BACKGROUND: The global cancer burden (GCB) is expected to rise significantly during the next few decades with most of the new cancers and cancer-related deaths afflicting the low- to middle-income countries. The ability to tackle this rising GCB requires the presence of an adequately trained surgical oncology workforce, which is dependent on credible training pathways and sustainable certification pipelines. The purpose of this article is to review briefly the training patterns and certification requirements for surgical oncologists globally by sampling representative countries across all regions of the world. METHODS: A thorough literature search was conducted using multiple websites of credible national/global organizations as well as the websites of individual countries. Countries from select regions in the world were included (based on the World Health Organization regions and Human Development Index) in the analysis to determine the prevalent trends in the training of surgical oncologists globally. RESULTS: Several trends and significant differences were noted in the training patterns of surgical oncologists globally. The presence or absence of domestic surgical oncology fellowships had an inverse correlation to the income level of the country. Countries without domestic fellowships usually relied on high-income foreign destinations for their training. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the analysis demonstrated significant variability in training of surgical oncologists globally. Despite the diversity, we noticed some general trends based on which some recommendations were put forth for increasing the global surgical oncology workforce.
Authors: Ismael Dominguez-Rosado; Vitor Moutinho; Ronald P DeMatteo; T Peter Kingham; Michael D'Angelica; Murray F Brennan Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Wilfred Ngwa; Beatrice W Addai; Isaac Adewole; Victoria Ainsworth; James Alaro; Olusegun I Alatise; Zipporah Ali; Benjamin O Anderson; Rose Anorlu; Stephen Avery; Prebo Barango; Noella Bih; Christopher M Booth; Otis W Brawley; Jean-Marie Dangou; Lynette Denny; Jennifer Dent; Shekinah N C Elmore; Ahmed Elzawawy; Diane Gashumba; Jennifer Geel; Katy Graef; Sumit Gupta; Serigne-Magueye Gueye; Nazik Hammad; Laila Hessissen; Andre M Ilbawi; Joyce Kambugu; Zisis Kozlakidis; Simon Manga; Lize Maree; Sulma I Mohammed; Susan Msadabwe; Miriam Mutebi; Annet Nakaganda; Ntokozo Ndlovu; Kingsley Ndoh; Jerry Ndumbalo; Mamsau Ngoma; Twalib Ngoma; Christian Ntizimira; Timothy R Rebbeck; Lorna Renner; Anya Romanoff; Fidel Rubagumya; Shahin Sayed; Shivani Sud; Hannah Simonds; Richard Sullivan; William Swanson; Verna Vanderpuye; Boateng Wiafe; David Kerr Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 54.433
Authors: Harald J Hoekstra; Theo Wobbes; Erik Heineman; Samuel Haryono; Teguh Aryandono; Charles M Balch Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 5.344