Literature DB >> 25604670

Treatment of head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis) infestation: is regular combing alone with a special detection comb effective at all levels?

Özgür Kurt1, I Cüneyt Balcıoğlu, M Emin Limoncu, Nogay Girginkardeşler, Süha K Arserim, Serhan Görgün, Tuba Oyur, Mehmet Karakuş, Didem Düzyol, Aysegül Aksoy Gökmen, Gül Kitapçıoğlu, Yusuf Özbel.   

Abstract

Head lice infestation (HLI) caused by Pediculus humanus capitis has been a public health problem worldwide. Specially designed combs are used to identify head lice, while anti-lice products are applied on the scalp for treatment. In the present study, we aimed to test whether combing only by precision detection comb (PDC) or metal pin comb (MPC) could be effective alternatives to the use of anti-lice products in children. A total of 560 children from two rural schools in Turkey were screened. In the PDC trial, children were combed every second day for 14 days, while in the MPC trial, combing was performed once in every four days for 15 days. Children were divided into two groups (dry combing and wet combing) for both trials and results were compared. The results showed no significant differences between dry and wet combing strategies for both combs for the removal of head lice (p > 0.05). The number of adult head lice declined significantly on each subsequent combing day in both approaches, except on day 15 in the MPC trial. In the end, no louse was found in 54.1 and 48.9% of children in the PDC and MPC trials, respectively. Since family members of infested children were not available, they were not checked for HLI. Four times combing within 2 weeks with MPC combs was found effective for both treatment of low HLI and prevention of heavy HLI. In conclusion, regular combing by special combs decreases HLI level in children and is safely applicable as long-term treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25604670     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4311-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  17 in total

1.  Accuracy of diagnosis of pediculosis capitis: visual inspection vs wet combing.

Authors:  Claudia Jahnke; Eline Bauer; Ulrich R Hengge; Hermann Feldmeier
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2009-03

Review 2.  Pediculosis capitis: new insights into epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  H Feldmeier
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Ovicidal effects of a neem seed extract preparation on eggs of body and head lice.

Authors:  Heinz Mehlhorn; Fathy Abdel-Ghaffar; Khaled A S Al-Rasheid; Jürgen Schmidt; Margit Semmler
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Louse comb versus direct visual examination for the diagnosis of head louse infestations.

Authors:  K Y Mumcuoglu; M Friger; I Ioffe-Uspensky; F Ben-Ishai; J Miller
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Bartonella quintana in head louse nits.

Authors:  Emmanouil Angelakis; Jean-Marc Rolain; Didier Raoult; Philippe Brouqui
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-05

Review 6.  Potential role of head lice, Pediculus humanus capitis, as vectors of Rickettsia prowazekii.

Authors:  D Robinson; N Leo; P Prociv; S C Barker
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Plastic detection comb better than visual screening for diagnosis of head louse infestation.

Authors:  C Balcioglu; I F Burgess; M E Limoncu; M T Sahin; Y Ozbel; C Bilaç; O Kurt; K S Larsen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 2.451

8.  Comparison of two combs in the detection of head lice in school children.

Authors:  Ozgür Kurt; Tuba Tabak; Hakan Kavur; Hasan Muslu; Emin Limoncu; Cemal Bilaç; I Cüneyt Balcioğlu; Yaşar Kaya; Yusuf Ozbel; Kim Larsen
Journal:  Turkiye Parazitol Derg       Date:  2009

9.  Socioeconomic status, family background and other key factors influence the management of head lice in Norway.

Authors:  Bjørn Arne Rukke; Arnulf Soleng; Heidi Heggen Lindstedt; Preben Ottesen; Tone Birkemoe
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Treatment of head lice with dimeticone 4% lotion: comparison of two formulations in a randomised controlled trial in rural Turkey.

Authors:  Ozgür Kurt; I Cüneyt Balcioğlu; Ian F Burgess; M Emin Limoncu; Nogay Girginkardeşler; Tuba Tabak; Hasan Muslu; Ozge Ermiş; M Turhan Sahin; Cemal Bilac; Hakan Kavur; Yusuf Ozbel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  5 in total

1.  Head lice in progress: what could/should be done-a report on an in vivo and in vitro field study.

Authors:  Fathy Abdel-Ghaffar; Mohammed Abdel-Aty; Ibrahim Rizk; Saleh Al-Quraishy; Margit Semmler; Falk Gestmann; Norman-Philipp Hoff
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  The potential application of plant essential oils to control Pediculus humanus capitis (Anoplura: Pediculidae).

Authors:  María Mercedes Gutiérrez; Jorge Omar Werdin-González; Natalia Stefanazzi; Cristina Bras; Adriana Alicia Ferrero
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled clinical study with lice shampoo (Licener®) versus dimethicone (Jacutin® Pedicul Fluid) for the treatment of infestations with head lice.

Authors:  Margit Semmler; Fathy Abdel-Ghaffar; Falk Gestmann; Mohammed Abdel-Aty; Ibrahim Rizk; Saleh Al-Quraishy; Walter Lehmacher; Norman-Philipp Hoff
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 4.  Paediatrics: how to manage pediculosis capitis.

Authors:  Alexander K C Leung; Joseph M Lam; Kin Fon Leong; Benjamin Barankin; Kam Lun Hon
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2022-03-14

5.  Chemical composition and efficacy of some selected plant oils against Pediculus humanus capitis in vitro.

Authors:  Doaa A Yones; Hanaa Y Bakir; Soad A L Bayoumi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.289

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.