Literature DB >> 25604612

Joints and their relations as critical features in action discrimination: evidence from a classification image method.

Jeroen J A van Boxtel1, Hongjing Lu2.   

Abstract

Classifying an action as a runner or a walker is a seemingly effortless process. However, it is difficult to determine which features are used with hypothesis-driven research, because biological motion stimuli generally consist of about a dozen joints, yielding an enormous number of potential relationships among them. Here, we develop a hypothesis-free approach based on a classification image method, using experimental data from relatively few trials (∼1,000 trials per subject). Employing ambiguous actions morphed between a walker and a runner, we identified three types of features that play important roles in discriminating bipedal locomotion presented in a side view: (a) critical joint feature, supported by the finding that the similarity of the movements of feet and wrists to prototypical movements of these joints were most reliably used across all participants; (b) structural features, indicated by contributions from almost all other joints, potentially through a form-based analysis; and (c) relational features, revealed by statistical correlations between joint contributions, specifically relations between the two feet, and relations between the wrists/elbow and the hips. When the actions were inverted, only critical joint features remained to significantly influence discrimination responses. When actions were presented with continuous depth rotation, critical joint features and relational features associated strongly with responses. Using a double-pass paradigm, we estimated that the internal noise is about twice as large as the external noise, consistent with previous findings. Overall, our novel design revealed a rich set of critical features that are used in action discrimination. The visual system flexibly selects a subset of features depending on viewing conditions.
© 2015 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action classification; action perception; biological motion; classification images; double-pass paradigm

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25604612     DOI: 10.1167/15.1.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

1.  Efficiencies for parts and wholes in biological-motion perception.

Authors:  W Drew Bromfield; Jason M Gold
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Internal noise measures in coarse and fine motion direction discrimination tasks and the correlation with autism traits.

Authors:  Edwina R Orchard; Steven C Dakin; Jeroen J A van Boxtel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

3.  Social Interactions Receive Priority to Conscious Perception.

Authors:  Junzhu Su; Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Hongjing Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A comparison of form processing involved in the perception of biological and nonbiological movements.

Authors:  Steven M Thurman; Hongjing Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The Impact of Autistic Traits on Self-Recognition of Body Movements.

Authors:  Joseph M Burling; Akila Kadambi; Tabitha Safari; Hongjing Lu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.