| Literature DB >> 25604334 |
Lala Meng1, Xiaofei Zhang1, Yusheng Tang1, Kehe Su1, Jie Kong1.
Abstract
The hierarchically maclass="Chemical">cro/mi<class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">cro-porous silicon-carbon-nitrogen (Si-C-N) hybrid material was presented with novel functionalities of totally selective and highly efficient adsorption for organic dyes. The hybrid material was conveniently generated by the pyrolysis of commercial polysilazane precursors using polydivinylbenzene microspheres as sacrificial templates. Owing to the Van der Waals force between sp-hybridized carbon domains and triphenyl structure of dyes, and electrostatic interaction between dyes and Si-C-N matrix, it exhibites high adsorption capacity and good regeneration and recycling ability for the dyes with triphenyl structure, such as methyl blue (MB), acid fuchsin (AF), basic fuchsin and malachite green. The adsorption process is determined by both surface adsorption and intraparticle diffusion. According to the Langmuir model, the adsorption capacity is 1327.7 mg·g(-1) and 1084.5 mg·g(-1) for MB and AF, respectively, which is much higher than that of many other adsorbents. On the contrary, the hybrid materials do not adsorb the dyes with azo benzene structures, such as methyl orange, methyl red and congro red. Thus, the hierarchically porous Si-C-N hybrid material from a facile and low cost polymer-derived strategy provides a new perspective and possesses a significant potential in the treatment of wastewater with complex organic pollutants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25604334 PMCID: PMC4300473 DOI: 10.1038/srep07910
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic illustration of preparation of hierarchically porous silicon–carbon–nitrogen hybrid materials from a pyrolysis of polysilazane and nickelocene by using polydivinylbenzene (PDVB) microspheres.
Figure 2The molecular structures of representative dyes, i.e. methyl blue (MB), acid fuchsin (AF), malachite green (MG), methyl violet (MV), methyl red (MR), methyl orange (MO), and congo red (CR).
Figure 3Thermograms of P1 (pure sacrificial filler), P2 (NiCp2 containing polysilazane), and P3 (polysilazane containing NiCp2 and sacrificial filler) obtained from simultaneous analysis by TGA/DSC under an argon atmosphere at a scanning rate of 10 K min−1, (a) TGA curves, (b) DSC curves.
Figure 4The simultaneous TGA and mass spectrometry of P3 (PSZ:PDVB:NiCp2 = 1:1:4).
Figure 5(a) Powder XRD patterns of the Si–C–N porous materials obtained from P3 (PSZ:PDVB:NiCp2 = 1:1:4) at 600, 750, and 1100°C, (b) Raman spectrum of Si–C–N porous materials obtained from P1 (PSZ:PDVB:NiCp2 = :2:0.04) pyrolyzed at 600°C.
Figure 6XPS spectra of porous Si–C–N hybrid material from precursor (PSZ:PDVB:NiCp2 = 1:2:0.04) pyrolyzed at 600°C (C1).
The binding energy of different bonds of Si–C–N porous material pyrolyzed at 600°C (C1)
| Si2p | C1s | N1s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bond | Binding energy (eV) | Bond | Binding energy (eV) | Bond | Binding energy (eV) |
| Si-Si | 99.1 | C-Si | 281.8-283.2 | Si-N–C | 396.9 |
| Si-C | 100.5 | C = C | 284.5 | Si–N–Si | 398.0 |
| C–Si–O | 101.8 | C-C | 285.5 | Si–N–O | 399.2 |
| N–Si–N | 102.9 | C–O–H | 286.6 | ----- | ----- |
| N–Si–O | 104.1 | C = O | 288.1 | ------ | ------ |
Figure 7SEM images of Si–C–N porous materials from precursors with a PSZ:PDVB:NiCp2 of (a) 1:0.3:0.04, (b) 1:0.5:0.04, (c) 1:1:0.04, (d) 1:2:0.04.
Figure 8Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore size distribution (PSD) calculated using adsorption branch of the BJH algorithm for (a) C1 and (b) C2.
Figure 9The temporal evolution of UV spectral of two dye solution in the presence of Si–C–N porous material (a) MB (b) AF.
Figure 10(a) Adsorption kinetics curves and (b) pseudo-second-order kinetic plots for the adsorption of two dyes on C1 (initial concentration: 200 mg L−1 for MB and AF, dosage of C1: 666 mg L−1).
The fitting results of the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models to the experimental data
| 2nd-order kinetic model t/Qt = 1/(K2Qe2) + t/Qe | 1st-order kinetic model log(Qe−Qt) = log(Qe)−(k1/2.303)t | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dye | Qe,exp(mg g−1) | Qe,cal(mg g−1) | K2(·104) (g mg−1 min−1) | R2 | Qe,cal(mg g−1) | K1(·103) (g mg−1) | R2 |
| MB | 291.8391 | 292.3976 | 3.304 | 0.99987 | 80.978 | 4.030 | 0.68619 |
| AF | 278.8342 | 279.33 | 1.121 | 0.99705 | 131.659 | 2.372 | 0.72439 |
aInitial concentration: 200 mg L−1 for MB and FA, dosage of porous adsorbent: 666 mg L−1.
Figure 11Pore-diffusion model plots for the adsorption of MB and AF on C1.
Figure 12(a) Adsorption isotherms of two dyes on C1 and (b) Fitting plots of Langmuir isotherm models for two dyes on C1.
Summary of the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm model parameters for the adsorption of two dyes on porous Si–C–N hybrid material
| dye | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| isotherm | parameter | MB | AF |
| Langmuir | Qm(mg g−1) | 1327.69 | 1084.45 |
| KL(L mg−1) | 0.12089 | 0.08475 | |
| R2 | 0.99984 | 0.99975 | |
| Freundlich | parameter | 272 | 173 |
| n | 3.20 | 2.92 | |
| R2 | 0.89304 | 0.82843 | |
The comparison of the maximum adsorption capacity of MB and AF on porous Si–C–N hybrid material with other adsorbents
| dye | adsorbents | adsorption capacity (mg g−1) | ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| MB | magnetic chitosan grafted with graphene oxide | 95.3 | |
| Mn/MCM-41 | 131.6 | ||
| organo-bentonite | 98.2 | ||
| barium phosphate nano-flake | 1500 | ||
| magnetic-cyclodextrin chitosan | 2780 | ||
| porous Si–C–N hybrid material | 1327.7 | this study | |
| AF | modified cellulose | 105.7 | |
| fixed-bed column | 181.82 | ||
| carbon nanotube–graphene hybrid aerogels | 66.4 | ||
| porous Si–C–N hybrid material | 1084.5 | this work |
Figure 13Plots of Ln(Qe/Ce) vs. Qe for the calculation of thermodynamic parameters.
Figure 14Adsorption behaviors of C1 for different dyes (a) basic fuchsin, (b) methyl violet, (c) malachite green, (d) methyl orange, (e) congo red, and (f) methyl red.
Figure 15Schematic illustration of the dyes selective adsorption of Si–C–N porous materials.
Figure 16Removal percentages of MB in five recycle runs using regenerated C1 (initial concentration: 200 mg·L−1).
Figure 17The suggested selective adsorption mechanism, (a) the interaction between sp2 carbon domain and triphenyl structure of MB, (b) the interaction between sp2carbon domain and azo-benzene ring structure of MO calculated according to AM1, (c) suggested selective adsorption mechanism of dyes for porous Si–C–N hybrid material.
Figure 18Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of (a) C1-MB and (b) C1-AF.
Figure 19The MAS Solid-state 13C NMR spectra of MB, C1 and C1-MB (a), and the sp2-hybridization carbon atoms peaks fitted using Gaussian peaks (b).