Literature DB >> 25603897

Blood flow restricted and traditional resistance training performed to fatigue produce equal muscle hypertrophy.

J Farup1, F de Paoli2, K Bjerg1, S Riis1, S Ringgard3, K Vissing1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the hypertrophic potential of load-matched blood-flow restricted resistance training (BFR) vs free-flow traditional resistance training (low-load TRT) performed to fatigue. Ten healthy young subjects performed unilateral BFR and contralateral low-load TRT elbow flexor dumbbell curl with 40% of one repetition maximum until volitional concentric failure 3 days per week for 6 weeks. Prior to and at 3 (post-3) and 10 (post-10) days post-training, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to estimate elbow flexor muscle volume and muscle water content accumulation through training. Acute changes in muscle thickness following an early vs a late exercise bout were measured with ultrasound to determine muscle swelling during the immediate 0-48 h post-exercise. Total work was threefold lower for BFR compared with low-load TRT (P < 0.001). Both BRF and low-load TRT increased muscle volume by approximately 12% at post-3 and post-10 (P < 0.01) with no changes in MRI-determined water content. Training increased muscle thickness during the immediate 48 h post-exercise (P < 0.001) and to greater extent with BRF (P < 0.05) in the early training phase. In conclusion, BFR and low-load TRT, when performed to fatigue, produce equal muscle hypertrophy, which may partly rely on transient exercise-induced increases in muscle water content.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fiber recruitment; low-intensity resistance training; muscle volume; vascular occlusion; volitional fatigue

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25603897     DOI: 10.1111/sms.12396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  42 in total

Review 1.  The Effects of Blood Flow Restriction on Upper-Body Musculature Located Distal and Proximal to Applied Pressure.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Matthew B Jessee; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Cardiovascular and Muscular Response to NO LOAD Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction.

Authors:  Wenyuan G Zhu; Noam Yitzchaki; Tayla E Kuehne; Ryo Kataoka; Kevin T Mattocks; Samuel L Buckner
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 3.  Do metabolites that are produced during resistance exercise enhance muscle hypertrophy?

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Kevin T Mattocks; Matthew B Jessee; Samuel L Buckner; J Grant Mouser; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of 4 weeks of low-load unilateral resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on strength, thickness, V wave, and H reflex of the soleus muscle in men.

Authors:  David Colomer-Poveda; Salvador Romero-Arenas; Antonio Vera-Ibáñez; Manuel Viñuela-García; Gonzalo Márquez
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Post-exercise blood flow restriction attenuates muscle hypertrophy.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Samuel L Buckner; Matthew B Jessee; Kevin T Mattocks; J Grant Mouser; Brittany R Counts; Gilberto C Laurentino; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Body position influences arterial occlusion pressure: implications for the standardization of pressure during blood flow restricted exercise.

Authors:  Peter Sieljacks; Louise Knudsen; Mathias Wernbom; Kristian Vissing
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Comment on: Volume for Muscle Hypertrophy and Health Outcomes: The Most Effective Variable in Resistance Training.

Authors:  Daniel C Souza; Ricardo B Viana; Victor S Coswig; James P Fisher; James Steele; Paulo Gentil
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Effects of load on the acute response of muscles proximal and distal to blood flow restriction.

Authors:  Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Samuel L Buckner; Scott J Dankel; Kevin T Mattocks; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Low-load blood flow restriction elicits greater concentric strength than non-blood flow restriction resistance training but similar isometric strength and muscle size.

Authors:  Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Low-load resistance training to task failure with and without blood flow restriction: muscular functional and structural adaptations.

Authors:  Christopher Pignanelli; Heather L Petrick; Fatemeh Keyvani; George J F Heigenhauser; Joe Quadrilatero; Graham P Holloway; Jamie F Burr
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.