Literature DB >> 25603852

[Efficacy of tenofovir-based rescue therapy for patients with drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B].

Kanghyug Choi1, Han Min Lee1, Baek Gyu Jun1, Sae Hwan Lee1, Hong Soo Kim1, Sang Gyune Kim2, Young Seok Kim2, Boo Sung Kim2, Soung Won Jeong3, Jae Young Jang3, Young Don Kim4, Gab Jin Cheon4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plays a pivotal role in the management of drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B. However, it remains unclear whether TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy provides better outcomes than TDF monotherapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of TDF monotherapy with that of TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 76 patients receiving TDF-based rescue therapy for more than 12 months. Suboptimal response was defined as serum HBV-DNA level of > 60 IU/mL during prior rescue therapy. Multi-drug resistance was defined as the presence of two or more drug resistance-related mutations confirmed by mutation detection assay. The relationship between baseline characteristics and virologic response (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) at 12 months were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (72.4%) were suboptimal responders to prior rescue therapy, and 26 (34.2%) had multi-drug resistance. Forty-two patients (55.3%) received combination therapy with nucleoside analogues. Virologic response at 12 months was not significantly different between the TDF monotherapy group and TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy group (p = 0.098). The serum HBV DNA level was reduced to -4.49 ± 1.67 log10 IU/mL in the TDF monotherapy group and to -3.97 ± 1.69 log10 IU/mL in the TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy group at 12 months (p = 0.18). In multivariate analysis, female sex (p = 0.032), low baseline HBV-DNA level (p = 0.013), and TDF monotherapy (p = 0.046) were predictive factors for virologic response at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: TDF monotherapy showed similar efficacy to that of TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25603852     DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2015.65.1.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1598-9992


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the efficacy of tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir-based combination therapy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huilian Wang; Xi Lu; Xudong Yang; Qilan Ning
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

2.  Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve and nucleos(t)ide analogue-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients.

Authors:  Sang Kyung Jung; Kyung-Ah Kim; So Young Ha; Hyun Kyo Lee; Young Doo Kim; Bu Hyun Lee; Woo Hyun Paik; Jong Wook Kim; Won Ki Bae; Nam-Hoon Kim; June Sung Lee; Yoon Jung Jwa
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-25

3.  The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy.

Authors:  Jeong Han Kim; Sung Hyun Ahn; Soon Young Ko; Won Hyeok Choe; Kyun-Hwan Kim; So Young Kwon
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-15

Review 4.  Efficacy of Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Presenting with Suboptimal Responses to Pretreatment: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ling Chen; Xiwei Wang; Qiongfang Zhang; Jiaojiao Gong; Shasha Shen; Wenwei Yin; Huaidong Hu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Real World Experience of Telbivudine Versus Entecavir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B, Including Long-Term Outcomes after Treatment Modification.

Authors:  Jong Won Choi; Se Hyun Kim; Jeong Hun Seo; Yong Suk Cho; Sun Young Won; Byung Kyu Park; Han Ho Jeon; Yong Kang Lee; Chun Kyon Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.759

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.