Literature DB >> 25603545

Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis.

Maria Angeles Lopez-Olivo1, Matxalen Amezaga Urruela, Lynda McGahan, Eduardo N Pollono, Maria E Suarez-Almazor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rituximab is a selective, B-cell depleting, biologic agent for treating refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeted against CD 20 that is promoted as therapy for patients who fail to respond to other biologics. There is evidence to suggest that rituximab is effective and well tolerated when used in combination with methotrexate for RA.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of rituximab for the treatment of RA. SEARCH
METHODS: We conducted a search (until January 2014) in electronic databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science), clinical trials registries, and websites of regulatory agencies. Reference lists from comprehensive reviews were also screened. SELECTION CRITERIA: All controlled trials comparing treatment with rituximab as monotherapy or in combination with any disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) (traditional or biologic) versus placebo or other DMARD (traditional or biologic) in adult patients with active RA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and abstracted data from each study. MAIN
RESULTS: We included eight studies with 2720 patients. For six studies selection bias could not be evaluated and two studies were considered to have low risk of bias. The level of evidence ranged from low to high, but was rated as moderate for most outcomes. We have prioritised reporting of rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate since this is the approved dose and most commonly used combination. We also reported data on other combinations and doses as supplementary information in the results section of the review.American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response rates were statistically significantly improved with rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate compared with methotrexate alone at 24 to 104 weeks. The RR for achieving an ACR 50 at 24 weeks was 3.3 (95% CI 2.3 to 4.6); 29% of patients receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate achieved the ACR 50 compared to 9% of controls. The absolute treatment benefit (ATB) was 21% (95% CI 16% to 25%) with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 6 (95% CI 4 to 9).At 52 weeks, the RR for achieving clinical remission (Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 joints < 2.6) with rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate compared with methotrexate monotherapy was 2.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.5); 22% of patients receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate achieved clinical remission compared to 11% of controls. The ATB was 11% (95% CI 2% to 20%) with a NNT of 7 (95% CI 4 to 13).At 24 weeks, the RR for achieving a clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (> 0.22) for patients receiving rituximab combined with methotrexate compared to patients on methotrexate alone was 1.6 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.1). The ATB was 24% (95% CI 12% to 36%) with an NNT of 5 (95% CI 3 to 13). At 104 weeks, the RR for achieving a CMI in HAQ (> 0.22) was 1.4 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.6). The ATB was 24% (95% CI 16% to 31%) with a NNT of 5 (95% CI 3 to 7).At 24 weeks, the RR for preventing radiographic progression in patients receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate was 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4) compared to methotrexate alone; 70% of patients receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate had no radiographic progression compared to 59% of controls. The ATB was 11% (95% CI 2% to 19%) and the NNT was 10 (95% CI 5 to 57). Similar benefits were observed at 52 to 56 weeks and 104 weeks.Statistically significantly more patients achieved a CMI on the physical and mental components of the quality of life, measured by the Short Form (SF)-36, in the rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate-treated group compared with methotrexate alone at 24 to 52 weeks (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.4; NNT 4, 95% CI 3 to 8 and RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.9; NNT 8, 95% CI 5 to 19, respectively); 34 and 13 more patients out of 100 showed an improvement in the physical component of the quality of life measure compared to methotrexate alone (95% CI 5% to 84%; 95% CI 7% to 8%, respectively).There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference in the rates of withdrawals because of adverse events or for other reasons (that is, withdrawal of consent, violation, administrative, failure to return) in either group. However, statistically significantly more people receiving the control drug withdrew from the study compared to those receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate at all times (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.50; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.91; RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.82; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75, respectively). At 104 weeks, 37% withdrew from the control group and 20% withdrew from the rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate group. The absolute risk difference (ARD) was -20% (95% CI -34% to -5%) with a number needed to harm (NNH) of 7 (95% CI 5 to 11).A greater proportion of patients receiving rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate developed adverse events after their first infusion compared to those receiving methotrexate monotherapy and placebo infusions (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.9); 26% of those taking rituximab plus methotrexate reported more events associated with their first infusion compared to 16% of those on the control regimen with an ARD of 9% (95% CI 5% to 13%) and a NNH of 11 (95% CI 21 to 8). However, no statistically significant differences were noted in the rates of serious adverse events. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from eight studies suggests that rituximab (two 1000 mg doses) in combination with methotrexate is significantly more efficacious than methotrexate alone for improving the symptoms of RA and preventing disease progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25603545     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007356.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  26 in total

Review 1.  Altering the natural history of rheumatoid arthritis: The role of immunotherapy and biologics in orthopaedic care.

Authors:  Steven J Girdler; Ivan Ye; Ray Tang; Noah Kirschner
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  The significance and predictive value of free light chains in the urine of patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease.

Authors:  Carsten Paul Bramlage; Britta Froelich; Manuel Wallbach; Joan Minguet; Clemens Grupp; Cornelia Deutsch; Peter Bramlage; Michael Koziolek; Gerhard Anton Müller
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  CD21(-/low) B cells in human blood are memory cells.

Authors:  K Thorarinsdottir; A Camponeschi; N Cavallini; O Grimsholm; L Jacobsson; I Gjertsson; I-L Mårtensson
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  An overview of the diagnosis and management of immunoglobulin G4-related disease.

Authors:  Debashis Haldar; Paul Cockwell; Alex G Richter; Keith J Roberts; Gideon M Hirschfield
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Immunological evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with itolizumab.

Authors:  Lazaro E Aira; Patricia Hernández; Dinorah Prada; Araceli Chico; Jorge A Gómez; Zuyén González; Karla Fuentes; Carmen Viada; Zaima Mazorra
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 6.  Introduction to economic modeling for clinical rheumatologists: application to biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Carlo A Marra; Nick Bansback; Aslam H Anis; Kamran Shojania
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  Celecoxib for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Mahir Fidahic; Antonia Jelicic Kadic; Mislav Radic; Livia Puljak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-09

8.  Implementing a simple pharmacovigilance program to improve reporting of adverse events associated with biologic therapy in rheumatology: Preliminary results from the Calabria Biologics Pharmacovigilance Program (CBPP).

Authors:  Caterina Palleria; Luigi Iannone; Christian Leporini; Rita Citraro; Antonia Manti; Maurizio Caminiti; Pietro Gigliotti; Rosa Daniela Grembiale; Massimo L'Andolina; Giuseppe Muccari; Maria Diana Naturale; Domenico Olivo; Giuseppa Pagano Mariano; Roberta Pellegrini; Giuseppe Varcasia; Karim Abdalla; Emilio Russo; Francesco Ursini; Giovambattista De Sarro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: a Cochrane overview.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Robin Christensen; George A Wells; Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Rachelle Buchbinder; Maria Angeles Lopez-Olivo; Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Difficult-To-Treat Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Current and Future Options.

Authors:  Ilaria Pagnini; Federico Bertini; Rolando Cimaz
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.