Literature DB >> 25603471

Let's not, and say we would: imagined and actual responses to witnessing homophobia.

Jennifer Randall Crosby1, Johannes Wilson.   

Abstract

We compared imagined versus actual affective and behavioral responses to witnessing a homophobic slur. Participants (N = 72) witnessed a confederate using a homophobic slur, imagined the same scenario, or were not exposed to the slur. Those who imagined hearing the slur reported significantly higher levels of negative affect than those who actually witnessed the slur, and nearly one half of them reported that they would confront the slur, whereas no participants who actually heard the slur confronted it. These findings reveal a discrepancy between imagined and real responses to homophobic remarks, and they have implications for the likelihood that heterosexuals will actually confront homophobic remarks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  affective forecasting; behavioral forecasting; discrimination; gay and lesbian college students; homophobia; majority group allies; responding to discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25603471     DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1008284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Homosex        ISSN: 0091-8369


  1 in total

1.  Do dominant group members have different emotional responses to observing dominant-on-dominant versus dominant-on-disadvantaged ostracism? Some evidence for heightened reactivity to potentially discriminatory ingroup behavior.

Authors:  Corey Petsnik; Jacquie D Vorauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.