Literature DB >> 25603367

Cognition from on high and down low: Verticality and construal level.

Michael L Slepian1, E J Masicampo2, Nalini Ambady3.   

Abstract

Across 7 studies, the authors examined the relationship between experiences of verticality and abstract versus concrete processing. Experiencing high, relative to low, verticality led to higher level identifications for actions (Study 1), greater willingness to delay short-term monetary gains for larger long-term monetary gains (Studies 2 and 5), and more frequent perceptions of meaningful relationships between objects and categories (Studies 3, 4, and 6), demonstrating that high verticality leads to more high-level construals. Mechanisms of these effects were explored, and the studies present evidence suggesting that mood (Studies 3 and 4), felt power (Study 4), arousal (Study 4), perceptual scope (Study 4), superficial semantic associations (Study 5), and movement (Study 5) do not mediate these effects. Instead, we found that even minimal experiences of verticality influence construal level (Study 6) and that verticality can influence construal level independent of the many plausible mediators. Furthermore, the relationship is reciprocal with abstract and concrete processing influencing the verticality of one's visual perspective (Study 7), suggesting an intimate link between construal level (abstract vs. concrete processing) and experiences of verticality. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25603367     DOI: 10.1037/a0038265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  5 in total

1.  Being low prepares for being neglected: Verticality affects expectancy of social participation.

Authors:  Michael Niedeggen; Rudolf Kerschreiter; Diane Hirte; Sarah Weschke
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

2.  Water and Meadow Views Both Afford Perceived but Not Performance-Based Attention Restoration: Results From Two Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Katherine A Johnson; Annabelle Pontvianne; Vi Ly; Rui Jin; Jonathan Haris Januar; Keitaro Machida; Leisa D Sargent; Kate E Lee; Nicholas S G Williams; Kathryn J H Williams
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Manipulating the odds: The effects of Machiavellianism and construal level on cheating behavior.

Authors:  Mariela E Jaffé; Rainer Greifeneder; Marc-André Reinhard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evidence of a Bidirectional Association Between Daily Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction That Is Moderated by Daily Stress.

Authors:  Charlene Zhao; James K McNulty; Jordan A Turner; Lindsey L Hicks; Andrea L Meltzer
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-09-06

5.  Loss of control as a violation of expectations: Testing the predictions of a common inconsistency compensation approach in an inclusionary cyberball game.

Authors:  Michael Niedeggen; Rudolf Kerschreiter; Katharina Schuck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.