Cara L Pennel1, Kenneth R McLeroy, James N Burdine, David Matarrita-Cascante. 1. At the time of the study, Cara L. Pennel, Kenneth R. McLeroy, and James N. Burdine were with the Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College Station. David Matarrita-Cascante was with the Department of Recreation, Parks and Tourism Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought a better understanding of how nonprofit hospitals are fulfilling the community health needs assessment (CHNA) provision of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to conduct CHNAs and develop CHNA and implementation strategies reports. METHODS: Through an Internet search of an estimated 179 nonprofit hospitals in Texas conducted between December 1, 2013, and January 5, 2014, we identified and reviewed 95 CHNA and implementation strategies reports. We evaluated and scored reports with specific criteria. We analyzed hospital-related and other report characteristics to understand relationships with report quality. RESULTS: There was wide-ranging diversity in CHNA approaches and report quality. Consultant-led CHNA processes and collaboration with local health departments were associated with higher-quality reports. CONCLUSIONS: At the time of this study, the Internal Revenue Service had not yet issued the final regulations for the CHNA requirement. This provides an opportunity to strengthen the CHNA guidance for the final regulations, clarify the purpose of the assessment and planning process and reports, and better align assessment and planning activities through a public health framework.
OBJECTIVES: We sought a better understanding of how nonprofit hospitals are fulfilling the community health needs assessment (CHNA) provision of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to conduct CHNAs and develop CHNA and implementation strategies reports. METHODS: Through an Internet search of an estimated 179 nonprofit hospitals in Texas conducted between December 1, 2013, and January 5, 2014, we identified and reviewed 95 CHNA and implementation strategies reports. We evaluated and scored reports with specific criteria. We analyzed hospital-related and other report characteristics to understand relationships with report quality. RESULTS: There was wide-ranging diversity in CHNA approaches and report quality. Consultant-led CHNA processes and collaboration with local health departments were associated with higher-quality reports. CONCLUSIONS: At the time of this study, the Internal Revenue Service had not yet issued the final regulations for the CHNA requirement. This provides an opportunity to strengthen the CHNA guidance for the final regulations, clarify the purpose of the assessment and planning process and reports, and better align assessment and planning activities through a public health framework.
Authors: Deborah Parra-Medina; Doug Taylor; Robert F Valois; Michelle Rousseau; Murray L Vincent; Belinda M Reininger Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2003-10
Authors: Sanne Magnan; Elliott Fisher; David Kindig; George Isham; Doug Wood; Mark Eustis; Carol Backstrom; Scott Leitz Journal: Minn Med Date: 2012-11
Authors: Brook E Harmon; Emily Rose N San Diego; Latrice C Pichon; Terrinieka W Powell; Fedoria Rugless; Nathan T West; Lottie Minor; Sterling McNeal; Lauren McCann; Lauren S Hales; Rachel Davis; Jonathan Lewis Journal: Eval Program Plann Date: 2022-07-08