Literature DB >> 25602537

Sediment delivery estimates in water quality models altered by resolution and source of topographic data.

Peter C Beeson, Ali M Sadeghi, Megan W Lang, Mark D Tomer, Craig S T Daughtry.   

Abstract

Moderate-resolution (30-m) digital elevation models (DEMs) are normally used to estimate slope for the parameterization of non-point source, process-based water quality models. These models, such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), use the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and Modified USLE to estimate sediment loss. The slope length and steepness factor, a critical parameter in USLE, significantly affects sediment loss estimates. Depending on slope range, a twofold difference in slope estimation potentially results in as little as 50% change or as much as 250% change in the LS factor and subsequent sediment estimation. Recently, the availability of much finer-resolution (∼3 m) DEMs derived from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data has increased. However, the use of these data may not always be appropriate because slope values derived from fine spatial resolution DEMs are usually significantly higher than slopes derived from coarser DEMs. This increased slope results in considerable variability in modeled sediment output. This paper addresses the implications of parameterizing models using slope values calculated from DEMs with different spatial resolutions (90, 30, 10, and 3 m) and sources. Overall, we observed over a 2.5-fold increase in slope when using a 3-m instead of a 90-m DEM, which increased modeled soil loss using the USLE calculation by 130%. Care should be taken when using LiDAR-derived DEMs to parameterize water quality models because doing so can result in significantly higher slopes, which considerably alter modeled sediment loss.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25602537     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2012.0148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  2 in total

Review 1.  Applicability of water quality models around the world-a review.

Authors:  Cássia Monteiro da Silva Burigato Costa; Leidiane da Silva Marques; Aleska Kaufmann Almeida; Izabel Rodrigues Leite; Isabel Kaufmann de Almeida
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Impacts of Watershed Characteristics and Crop Rotations on Winter Cover Crop Nitrate-Nitrogen Uptake Capacity within Agricultural Watersheds in the Chesapeake Bay Region.

Authors:  Sangchul Lee; In-Young Yeo; Ali M Sadeghi; Gregory W McCarty; W Dean Hively; Megan W Lang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.