| Literature DB >> 25602018 |
Leila Jafari1, Pascal Vachon2, Francis Beaudry2, Eve Langelier1.
Abstract
Animal models of forced running are used to study overuse tendinopathy, a common health problem for which clear evidence for effective and accessible treatments is still lacking. In these models, pain evaluation is necessary to better understand the disease, help design and evaluate therapies, and ensure humane treatment of the animals. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to evaluate pain and pathologic findings in an animal model of moderate Achilles tendinopathy induced by treadmill running. Air puffs, instead of electrical shocks, were used to stimulate running so that pain associated with stimulation would be avoided. Pressure pain sensitivity was evaluated in vivo using a new instrumented plier, whereas spinal cord peptides were analyzed ex vivo with high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Tendon histologic slides were semiquantitatively evaluated, using the Bonar score technique and biomechanical properties, using the traction test. After 8 weeks of treadmill running (2 weeks for adaptation and 6 weeks for the lesion protocol), the protocol was stopped because the air puffs became ineffective to stimulate running. We, nevertheless, observed some histologic changes characteristic of overuse tendinopathy as well as decreased mechanical properties, increased Substance P and dynorphin A peptides but without pressure pain sensitivity. These results suggest that air-puffs stimulation is sufficient to induce an early stage tendinopathy to study new therapeutic drugs without inducing unnecessary pain. They also indicate that pain-associated peptides could be related with movement evoked pain and with the sharp breakdown of the running performance.Entities:
Keywords: Air‐puff stimulation; Bonar score; Randall–Selitto test; calcitonin gene‐related peptide; dynorphin A; instrumented plier; mechanical properties; substance P; treadmill
Year: 2015 PMID: 25602018 PMCID: PMC4387767 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Treadmill running models for the study of tendinopathy in the rat.
| Reference | Rat strain | Age; Weight | Adaptation to the treadmill | Running protocol | Results; Time point | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speed; inclination | Frequency | |||||
| Abraham et al. ( | Sprague–Dawley (Male) | 4 months (~17 weeks); 448.7 ± 10 g | 2 weeks; Increased exposition to the treadmill | 16.7 m/min; 10° uphill | 1 h/day; 5 or 7 days/week | Tendinopathy; Observable differences in histology; 12 weeks |
| Dirks et al. ( | HCR | 24.8 ± 3.2 weeks; 374.0 ± 30.3 g | 2 weeks; Increase in the running duration (5–60 min) and speed (10–25 m/min) | 20–30 m/min; 15° uphill | 1 h/day; 5 days/week | No tendinopathy; No significant differences in histology; 7 weeks |
| Glazebrook et al. ( | Sprague–Dawley (Male | 61–63 days (~9 weeks); 300–325 g | 4 days; Increase in the running duration (15 to 60 min) | 17 m/min; 10° uphill | 1 h/day; 5 days/week | Tendinopathy; Significant differences in histology (nuclei density, collagen organization and staining); 12 weeks |
| Heinemeier et al. ( | Sprague–Dawley (Male) | 12–13 weeks | 1 week; Increase in the running duration (10 to 60 min) | 17–20 m/min; 10° uphill | 1 h/day; 5 days/week | Tendon improvement; Significant differences in biomechanics (failure stress/body weight and modulus); 12 weeks |
| Ng et al. ( | Sprague–Dawley (Female) | 3 months (~13 weeks); 292–360 g | 1 week; Increase of the running duration (20–60 min) and speed (10– 17 m/min) | 17 m/min; 20° downhill (Running on hind legs) | 1 h/day; 7 days/week | Tendinopathy; Observable differences in histology Significant differences in biomechanics (strength and stiffness); 7 weeks |
| Scott et al. ( | Sprague–Dawley (Male) | Not mentioned | 2 weeks; Increased exposition to the treadmill | 16.7 m/min; 11° downhill (Shoulder tendinopathy) | 1 h/day including 5 min pause after 8 weeks; 5 or 7 days/week | No tendinopathy; No significant differences in histology; 4 and 8 weeks; Shoulder tendinopathy; Significant differences in histology (global Bonar score and proliferation); 12 and 16 weeks |
| Silva et al. ( | Wistar (Male) | 11–12 weeks; 220–250 grams | 2 weeks; 80 min at 13.4 m/min | 26.8 m/min; 10° uphill | 1 h 20 min/day including 10 min warm‐up and 10 min cool‐down 5 days/week | Tendinopathy; Significant differences in histology (cellularity, microtearing, collagen deposition and GAG); 4, 8, and 16 weeks |
| Soslowsky et al. ( | Sprague–Dawley (Male) | 521 ± 33 g at death | Not mentioned | 17 m/min; 10° downhill (Shoulder tendinopathy) | 1 h/day; 5 days/week | Shoulder tendinopathy; Observable differences in histology (cellularity, cell shape and collagen organization) Significant differences in biomechanics (maximum stress and tissue modulus); 4, 8, and 16 weeks |
| Yoshida et al. ( | Wistar (Male) | 16–18 weeks; 350–400 g | 2 weeks; Increase in the running duration (5–60 min) and speed (10–25 m/min) | 0.5 h m/h (8.33 m/min; 10% inclination (Patellar and rotator cuff tentendinopathies) | 40 km; 40 hours | Patellar insertion tendinopathy; Observable differences in histology (microtears and lamination); 28 days after the 40‐day running protocol; Less tendinopathy‐specific histopathological change for the rotator cuff at insertion site. |
Approximated using Charles‐River weight chart.
HCR rats were selectively bred for high‐capacity running (Dirks et al. 2013).
Figure 1.Custom treadmill. Five rats run on a polyurethane belt in separate corridors. To stimulate running, resting rats are detected by infrared sensors which trigger the injection of air puffs via the opening of solenoid valves connected to a cylinder of compressed air.
Figure 2.Instrumented plier for the evaluation of pressure pain sensitivity in the Achilles tendon in vivo. The pressure on the rat tendon induces the bending of the measuring beam. The resulting strain is measured with two strain gages in half bridge.
Figure 3.Schematic representation of a longitudinal tendon section showing the position of the two ROIs for histologic analysis.
Boundary grades used for the semiquantitative scoring of histologic images of tendons.
| Criteria | Grade 0 | Grade 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Nucleus morphology | Thin and elongated | Large and round |
| Cytoplasm morphology | No obvious cytoplasm | Abundant cytoplasm |
| Cellular arrangement | Regular cell density | Presence of cell clusters |
| Collagen arrangement | Parallel arrangement | Multi‐directional arrangement |
| Vascularity | 0 blood vessels per ROI | ≥5 blood vessels per ROI |
| Ground substance | No stainable ground substance | Abundant ground substance |
Figure 4.Progression of the running experiment including 2 weeks of adaptation and 6 weeks of running. Rats ran, on the average, a total of 36.6 km. The experiment was stopped because the stimulation became too high. The number of air puffs followed an exponential curve and reached 15 air puffs/min (900 air puffs/h). Data are shown as mean ± SEM.
Figure 5.Micrographs of the proximal ROI of Achilles tendons (A–H; Bar = 200 μm) and micrographs of knee sections (I–J; Bar = 500 μm; Tib tibia, m meniscus, f femur) for a control rat and a runner. Arrows indicate blood vessels, asterisks indicate collagen disorganization, and arrow head indicate round nucleus and abundant cytoplasm. In the example shown, the Bonar score for the runner tendon is: Nucleus morphology: 3, Cytoplasm morphology: 2, Cellular arrangement: 2, Collagen arrangement: 2, Vascularity: 2, Ground substance: 3, Cell density: 64 and the Bonar score for the control tendon is: Nucleus morphology: 0, Cytoplasm morphology: 1, Cellular arrangement: 0.5, Collagen arrangement: 1.5, Vascularity: 2, Ground substance: 1, Cell density: 39. The scores for the control (I) and runner (J) knee histopathology are zero (details of parameters evaluated found in text). Images were subjected to color balance and brightness/contrast adjustments.
Figure 6.Histologic results for the Achilles tendons of runner and control rats. A–B: Bonar scores. C–D: Cell density. Columns represent the median, and symbols represent data. Encircled symbol represents an outlier removed from the analysis. Horizontal bars stand for significant differences between groups (P < 0.05)
Figure 7.Biomechanical results for the Achilles tendons of runner and control rats. Columns represent the median, and symbols represent data. Encircled symbols represent outliers removed from the analysis. Horizontal bars stand for significant differences between groups (P < 0.05).
Figure 8.Pain threshold measured with the instrumented plier for the treadmill and collagenase injection studies. Columns represent the median, and symbols represent data. Horizontal bars stand for significant differences between groups (P < 0.05).
Leg order and threshold comparison for pain evaluation in the collagenase study.
Figure 9.Spinal cord peptide concentrations for the treadmill and collagenase injection studies. Columns represent the median, and symbols represent data. Horizontal bars stand for significant differences between groups (P < 0.05).