Literature DB >> 25601917

Postoperative prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV).

Haitao Wang1, Zhanfeng Sun2, Weiliang Jiang1, Yingnan Zhang1, Xianwei Li1, Yalei Wu1.   

Abstract

To analyze the necessity of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for patients undergoing high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and to estimate the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulant protocols in a single-center randomized controlled trial with large sample size. A total of 2196 patients undergoing high ligation and stripping of the GSV were randomized to one of the following postoperative VTE prophylaxis protocols: group A, no VTE prophylaxis (n=542); group B, subcutaneous low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH) hypodermic injection, 125 U/kg per day in three divided doses (n=531); group C, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) 6000 IU once a day (n=573); and group D, LMWH 4000 IU twice daily (n=550). Groups were compared for the incidence of VTE and major hemorrhage within 1 month following surgery. Varicose vein severity was classified by CEAP (Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiologic elements) score. The clinical characteristics of the patients were equally matched between groups. Postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) were significantly higher in group A (DVT 5.17%, PE 1.48%) compared to groups B (0.56%, 0%), C (0.35%, 0%) and D (0.36%, 0%) (p<0.01). The incidence of VTE did not differ between the three active chemoprophylaxis arms. Hemorrhagic complications were low for each group but higher in group B (0.75%) compared to the other groups (group A 0.18%; group C 0.17%; group D 0.18%, p<0.01). Hemorrhagic complications did not differ amongst groups A, C and D. In conclusion, postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis following high ligation and GSV stripping effectively reduces the venous thrombosis complications of this procedure. Of the three active strategies tested, no difference in efficacy was noted; however, thrice daily LDUH did increase bleeding complications.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anticoagulants; heparin; low-molecular-weight; varicose veins; veins; venous thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25601917     DOI: 10.1177/1358863X14564592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Med        ISSN: 1358-863X            Impact factor:   3.239


  3 in total

1.  Deep Venous Thrombosis and Ulcers of Lower Limbs: Ultrasound Findings in 156 Patients.

Authors:  Alberto Garavello; Stefania Gilardi; Paola Fiamma; Valentina Toti; Massimo Tozzi; Pietro Fransvea
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2022-03-10

2.  Asymptomatic Isolated Calf Deep Vein Thrombosis: Does It Worsen after Varicose Vein Surgery?

Authors:  Sadaaki Horiguchi; Hisako Ono; Hiroyuki Shirato; Toshimitsu Kawakami; Shiho Yabuki; Naomi Morita; Nozomu Shirasugi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2017-12-25

3.  Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Thrombotic Risk Stratification in the Varicose Veins Surgery-Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wołkowski; Maciej Wołkowski; Tomasz Urbanek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.