| Literature DB >> 25601839 |
Christoph Küper1, Franz-Xaver Beck1, Wolfgang Neuhofer2.
Abstract
The osmosensitive transcription factor nuclear factor of activated T-cells 5 (NFAT5), also known as tonicity enhancer element binding protein (TonEBP) plays a crucial role in protection of renal medullary cells against hyperosmotic stress, urinary concentration, the adaptive immune response, and other physiological systems. Since it is also important for development, conventional homozygous-null mutations result in perinatal death, which hinders the analysis of NFAT5 function in specific tissues in vivo. Here we describe the generation of mice with a conditional-null allele, in which loxP sites are inserted around exon 4. Mice harboring the floxed allele (NFAT5(flx) ) were mated to a strain expressing a tamoxifen-inducible derivative of the Cre-recombinase (Cre (+)) under the control of the ubiqitinC promoter. The resultant homozygous conditional knockout mice (Cre (+) NFAT5 (flx/flx) ) are viable, fertile, and show normal expression of NFAT5 and NFAT5 target genes, indicating that the conditional alleles retain their wild-type function. Induction of Cre-mediated recombination by administration of tamoxifen in 8-week-old mice resulted in a decrease in NFAT5 expression of about 70-90% in all tested tissues (renal cortex, renal outer medulla, renal inner medulla, heart, lung, spleen, skeletal muscle). Accordingly, the expression of the NFAT5 target genes aldose reductase and heat shock protein 70 in the renal medulla was also significantly decreased. Mice harboring this conditional knockout allele should be useful in future studies for gaining a better understanding of tissue and cell-type specific functions of NFAT5 in adult animals under physiological and pathophysiological conditions.Entities:
Keywords: NFAT5; TonEBP; kidney physiology; knockout mouse model; osmosensing
Year: 2015 PMID: 25601839 PMCID: PMC4283511 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Oligonucleotides used in this study.
| P6 | 5′-GAG TGC ACC ATA TGG ACA TAT TGT C-3′ | Gene targeting |
| T7 | 5′-CGA TAA GCC AGG TTA ACC TGC ATT A-3′ | Gene targeting |
| N1 | 5′-TGC GAG GCC AGA GGC CAC TTG TGT AGC-3′ | Gene targeting |
| N2 | 5′-TTC CTC GTG CTT TAC GGT ATC G-3′ | Gene targeting |
| loxP | 5′-TGA GAA ACA TGT ATG TGG GGC ATG-3′ | Gene targeting |
| LOX2 | 5′-GTA ACC ATG ATT AGT CTT TTA GCT TTA TG-3′ | Gene targeting, genotyping |
| SDL2 | 5′-GTT CTG AGA ATC CAA AGC ACA AC-3′ | Gene targeting, genotyping |
| NDEL1 | 5′-GTT GTG CTT TGG ATT CTC AGA AC-3′ | Gene targeting |
| NDEL2 | 5′-CTT CTA CCC TTC TAT TTC AGG AAG-3′ | Gene targeting |
| A1 | 5′-CAC AAA TAC CTG CAA CAC CAG TGG-3′ | Gene targeting |
| A2 | 5′-ACG CCA GTG TCA TGT TGT TG-3′ | Gene targeting |
| A3 | 5′-GGA AAC AGA TAA CAT GCA TCA TAA ACA-3′ | Gene targeting |
| AT1 | 5′-AAAT CGT AGG CTA GTA CTC CAC CC-3′ | Gene targeting |
| AT2 | 5′-AGC TCA GGA AAA GCT TCC TG-3′ | Gene targeting |
| F3 | 5′-GCA TAA GCT TGG ATC CGT TCT TCG GAC-3′ | Gene targeting |
| F7 | 5′-GGA ACT TCG CTA GAC TAG TAC GCG TG-3′ | Gene targeting |
| LUNI | 5′-GCA TCG CCT TCT ATC GCC TTC TTG-3′ | Gene targeting |
| PB1.1 | 5′-TTT TGT GGC TAA GCA CAGT CCC-3′ | Southern blot probe |
| PB1.2 | 5′-CAT ACT GCA GCT CTG CTC AGA TCC-3′ | Southern blot probe |
| PB2.1 | 5′-TGA CTG CCC TCA ACA GTT CAT TTG-3′ | Southern blot probe |
| PB2.2 | 5′-ATT CAG GAT CTG CTA CCA CCA CTG-3′ | Southern blot probe |
| Cre320 sense | 5′-GAA CCT GAT GGA CAT GTT CA-3′ | Genotyping |
| Cre320 anti | 5′-AGT GCG TTC GAA CGC TAG AGC CTG T-3′ | Genotyping |
| NFAT5 sense | 5′-AAC ATT GGA CAG CCA AAA GG-3′ | qRT-PCR analysis |
| NFAT5 anti | 5′-GCA ACA CCA CTG GTT CAT TA-3′ | qRT-PCR analysis |
| AR sense | 5′-CTT AAA ATA TAA GCC TGC GGT GA-3′ | qRT-PCR analysis |
| AR anti | 5′-GCC TTT GCT GTG GCA GTA TT-3′ | qRT-PCR analysis |
| BGT-1 sense | 5′-GGC TCC TTT TGG TCA CAG AG-3′ | qRT-PCR analysis |
| BGT-1 anti | 5′-GCT GGA GGC GTA GTA GTC AAA-3′ | qRT-PCR analysis |
| HSP70 sense | 5′-TGA GTC CCA CAC TCT CAC CA-3′ | qRT-PCR analysis |
| HSP70 anti | 5′-CTG TGG GTG AAG CTG TTA AGG-3′ | qRT-PCR analysis |
| β-Actin sense | 5′-CTA AGG CCA ACC GTG AAA AG-3′ | qRT-PCR analysis |
| β-Actin anti | 5′-ACC AGA GGC ATA CAG GGA CA-3′ | qRT-PCR analysis |
Figure 1Generation of NFAT5 conditional null allele. (A) Schematic figures of the wild-type NFAT5 allele, the targeting vector, and the targeted NFAT5, NFAT5, and NFAT5Δ alleles. Exons are represented by open boxes in which the exon number is indicated. Black triangles denote loxP sites; gray triangles denote frt sites. The 5′ homologous arm of the targeting vector is ~ 5.25 kb, the 3′ homologous arm ~ 2.45 kb. P1 and P2 denote the location of the 5′- and the 3′- external probe used for Southern blot analysis. Arrows indicate the position of the primers used for gene targeting and genotyping. NFAT5 mice were mated with Flp mice to generate NFAT5 mice. NFAT5Δ mice were generated by crossing NFAT5 mice with transgenic Cre mice and subsequent tamoxifen administration to targeted offspring. (B) Southern blot analysis of NFAT5 genomic DNA. 5′- and 3′- external probes were used to detect the presence of the LA (5.25 kb) and the SA (2.45 kb) of the targeted NFAT5 fragment. (C) Genotypes of mice were identified using genomic DNA prepared from tail biopsies. Primers LOX2 and SDL2 were used to distinguish the targeted allele (392 bp) from the untargeted wild-type allele (334 bp).
Figure 2Expression of NFAT5 and NFAT5 target genes in the kidney. Cre+ NFAT5 mice (or Cre+ NFAT5+/+ mice, as control) were fed a tamoxifen-containing diet for 4 weeks to induce Cre-mediated excision of exon 4 of the NFAT5 gene. Subsequently, animals were sacrificed and tissue samples obtained from the renal cortex, outer medulla and inner medulla. (A) mRNA from renal cortex (☐), outer medulla () and inner medulla (■) was tested for transcription of NFAT5 and NFAT5 target genes AR, BGT-1 and HSP70 by semiquantitative RT-PCR. Relative mRNA abundance was normalized to that of β-actin to correct for differences in RNA input. Data are means ± SEM for n = 4; *P < 0.05. (B) Protein samples from renal cortex, outer medulla and inner medulla were tested for protein expression of NFAT5 and NFAT5 target genes AR and HSP70 by Western blot. To demonstrate comparable protein loading, the blots were also probed for actin. Representative blots from at least 4 independent experiments are shown.
Figure 3Expression of NFAT5 in various tissues of conditional knockout mice. Cre+ NFAT5 mice () or Cre+ NFAT5+/+ mice (■; as control) were fed a tamoxifen-containing diet for 4 weeks to induce Cre-mediated excision of exon 4 of the NFAT5 gene. Subsequently, tissue samples from heart, liver, spleen, and skeletal muscle, were taken and expression of NFAT5 was determined by semiquantitative qRT-PCR. Relative mRNA abundance was normalized to that of β-actin to correct for differences in RNA input. Data are means ± SEM for n = 4; *P < 0.05.