Irene Teo1,2, Diane M Novy3, David W Chang4, Matthew G Cox1, Michelle Cororve Fingeret1,2. 1. Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine & Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Depression and reduced quality of life are often reported in patients with upper-extremity lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment. Little is known about how pain and body image influence depression in patients with lymphedema. The current study examined the association of pain intensity and body integrity beliefs with depressive symptoms and the extent to which body image dissatisfaction mediated these associations. METHODS: A cross-sectional sample of patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment completed self-report questionnaires of pain, body image, and depressive symptoms. Hierarchical regression analyses and tests of mediation were conducted to examine the associations among the variables of interest. RESULTS: Pain intensity and body integrity beliefs were positively associated with depressive symptoms. Further, body image dissatisfaction mediated the relationship between pain and depressive symptoms, indicating that higher levels of pain led to higher states of body image dissatisfaction, which, in turn, led to greater depressive symptoms. Body image dissatisfaction also mediated the relationship between body integrity beliefs and depressive symptoms, suggesting that greater body integrity beliefs led to higher dissatisfaction with one's body and subsequently to greater depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide preliminary evidence that pain intensity and body image are important factors in understanding depressive symptoms in patients with lymphedema. Clinical implications include screening for pain and body image concerns in this population to identify patients who are in distress. Counseling interventions targeting body image dissatisfaction can also be potentially helpful for patients with lymphedema.
OBJECTIVE:Depression and reduced quality of life are often reported in patients with upper-extremity lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment. Little is known about how pain and body image influence depression in patients with lymphedema. The current study examined the association of pain intensity and body integrity beliefs with depressive symptoms and the extent to which body image dissatisfaction mediated these associations. METHODS: A cross-sectional sample of patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment completed self-report questionnaires of pain, body image, and depressive symptoms. Hierarchical regression analyses and tests of mediation were conducted to examine the associations among the variables of interest. RESULTS:Pain intensity and body integrity beliefs were positively associated with depressive symptoms. Further, body image dissatisfaction mediated the relationship between pain and depressive symptoms, indicating that higher levels of pain led to higher states of body image dissatisfaction, which, in turn, led to greater depressive symptoms. Body image dissatisfaction also mediated the relationship between body integrity beliefs and depressive symptoms, suggesting that greater body integrity beliefs led to higher dissatisfaction with one's body and subsequently to greater depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide preliminary evidence that pain intensity and body image are important factors in understanding depressive symptoms in patients with lymphedema. Clinical implications include screening for pain and body image concerns in this population to identify patients who are in distress. Counseling interventions targeting body image dissatisfaction can also be potentially helpful for patients with lymphedema.
Authors: Kenneth Mah; Sophie Lebel; Jonathan Irish; Andrea Bezjak; Ada Y M Payne; Gerald M Devins Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Antonio J Forte; Andrea Sisti; Maria T Huayllani; Daniel Boczar; Gabriela Cinotto; Pedro Ciudad; Oscar J Manrique; Xiaona Lu; Sarah McLaughlin Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2020-04
Authors: An De Groef; Nele Devoogdt; Ceren Gursen; Niamh Moloney; Victoria Warpy; Jolien Daelemans; Lore Dams; Vincent Haenen; Elien Van der Gucht; An-Kathleen Heroes; Tessa De Vrieze; Elizabeth Dylke Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2021-08-28 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Rachel Lentz; Christina Shin; Zoe Bloom; Kimiko Yamada; Young-Kwon Hong; Alex K Wong; Ketan Patel Journal: Lymphat Res Biol Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 2.589
Authors: Karen M Basen-Engquist; Margaret Raber; Cindy L Carmack; Banu Arun; Abenaa M Brewster; Michelle Fingeret; Susan M Schembre; Carol Harrison; Heidi Y Perkins; Yisheng Li; Jaejoon Song; Minxing Chen; James L Murray Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-04-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Hannah M Fisher; Joseph G Winger; Shannon N Miller; Arianna N Wright; Jennifer C Plumb Vilardaga; Catherine Majestic; Sarah A Kelleher; Tamara J Somers Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 3.603