Literature DB >> 25600567

Risk of subsequent in situ and invasive breast cancer in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive ductal carcinoma in situ.

G Curigliano1, D Disalvatore2, A Esposito3, G Pruneri4, M Lazzeroni5, A Guerrieri-Gonzaga5, A Luini6, R Orecchia7, A Goldhirsch8, N Rotmensz2, B Bonanni5, G Viale4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the prognostic role of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with HER2-positive DCIS among a population of 1667 cases, prospectively diagnosed and surgically treated at the European Institute of Oncology from 1996 to 2008. Rates of subsequent DCIS or invasive cancer in HER2-positive disease were estimated. We evaluated Cumulative Incidence of In Situ Breast Cancer Recurrence (isBCR), INvasive Breast Cancer Recurrence (IBCR) and any Breast Cancer Recurrence (BCR). isBCR, IBCR and BCR were defined as the time from surgery to breast cancer recurrence as first event (in situ, invasive or both, respectively) or last visit in case of no events.
RESULTS: We identified 560 (33.5%) patients with HER2-positive DCIS. The median follow-up was 7.6 years (interquartile range 5.9-9.5). We observed 422 events out of 1667 patients, with 141 in situ recurrences, 201 invasive recurrences and 80 other events (64 second primaries and 16 deaths). The 10-year isBCR proportions were 11.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.0% to 15.4%] in the HER2-positive group and 8.8% (95% CI 6.9% to 11.0%) in the HER2-negative group (Gray test, P = 0.010). At multivariable analysis, the adjusted risk of isBCR was higher in the HER2-positive group than in the HER2-negative group [hazard ratio (HR) HER2 positive versus negative: 1.59 (95% CI 1.06-2.39)]. We observed significant differences both in BCR and isBCR for patients treated by quadrantectomy without radiotherapy versus patients treated with radiotherapy [adjusted HR HER2 positive versus negative: 1.53 (95% CI 1.07-2.18) and adjusted HR HER2 positive versus negative: 2.18 (95% CI 2.18-3.69), respectively].
CONCLUSION: HER2 overexpression predicts an increased risk of isBCR. Radiotherapy reduces local failure rates in HER2-positive DCIS.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ductal carcinoma in situ; epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25600567     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  13 in total

Review 1.  In Vitro Models for Studying Invasive Transitions of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Ethan J Brock; Kyungmin Ji; Seema Shah; Raymond R Mattingly; Bonnie F Sloane
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Clinicopathologic Features, Treatment Patterns, and Disease Outcomes in a Modern, Prospective Cohort of Young Women Diagnosed with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Megan E Tesch; Shoshana M Rosenberg; Laura C Collins; Julia S Wong; Laura Dominici; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla Tamimi; Lidia Schapira; Virginia F Borges; Ellen Warner; Steven E Come; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Triple-negative and HER2 positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: characteristics, behavior, and biomarker profile.

Authors:  Satoshi Takahashi; Aye Aye Thike; Valerie Cui Yun Koh; Hironobu Sasano; Puay Hoon Tan
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Radiotherapy of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  David Krug; Rainer Souchon
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Prognostic and Predictive Value of HER2 Expression in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mangesh A Thorat; Pauline M Levey; J Louise Jones; Sarah E Pinder; Nigel J Bundred; Ian S Fentiman; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  A retrospective alternative for active surveillance trials for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Mieke R Van Bockstal; Marie C Agahozo; Linetta B Koppert; Carolien H M van Deurzen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Prognostic Value of ER and PgR Expression and the Impact of Multi-clonal Expression for Recurrence in Ductal Carcinoma in situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS Trial.

Authors:  Mangesh A Thorat; Pauline M Levey; J Louise Jones; Sarah E Pinder; Nigel J Bundred; Ian S Fentiman; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Extent of ductal carcinoma in situ according to breast cancer subtypes: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Shusma C Doebar; Esther C van den Broek; Linetta B Koppert; Agnes Jager; Margreet H A Baaijens; Inge-Marie A M Obdeijn; Carolien H M van Deurzen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Biology, Biomarkers, and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Stephen B Fox
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Paradigm Shift toward Reducing Overtreatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of Breast.

Authors:  Yasuaki Sagara; Wong Julia; Mehra Golshan; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.