Literature DB >> 25600188

The association between ICU level of care and mortality in the Netherlands.

Georg Heinrich Kluge1, Sylvia Brinkman, Giel van Berkel, Johannes van der Hoeven, Crétien Jacobs, Yvonne E M Snel, John P W Vogelaar, Nicolette F de Keizer, Emiel S Boon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The relationship between the number of patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) volume and mortality is currently the subject of debate. After implementation of a national guideline in 2006, all Dutch ICUs have been classified into three levels based on ICU size, patient volume, ventilation days, and staffing. The goal of this study is to investigate the association between ICU level and mortality of ICU patients in the Netherlands.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 132,159 patients admitted to 87 ICUs between January 1, 2009 and October 1, 2011. Logistic GEE analyses were performed to assess the influence of ICU level on in-hospital mortality and 90-day mortality in the total ICU population and in different ICU subgroups while adjusting for severity of illness by APACHE IV.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the adjusted in-hospital mortality of the total ICU population and in different subgroups admitted to level 1, 2 and 3 ICUs. In-hospital mortality in level 2 and 3 ICUs as opposed to level 1 ICUs was 1.06 (0.93-1.22) and 1.10 (0.94-1.29), respectively, and 90-day mortality was 0.92 (0.80-1.06) and 1.01 (0.88-1.17).
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that ICU level was not associated with significant differences in the case-mix adjusted in-hospital and long-term mortality of ICU patients. This finding is in contrast with some earlier studies suggesting a volume-outcome relationship. Our results may be explained by the successful implementation of nationwide mandatory quality requirements and adequate staffing in all three levels of ICUs over the last years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25600188     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3620-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  20 in total

1.  Record linkage strategies. Part I: Estimating information and evaluating approaches.

Authors:  L L Roos; A Wajda
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  Relationship between volume and survival in closed intensive care units is weak and apparent only in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Rafael Fernández; Susana Altaba; Lluis Cabre; Victoria Lacueva; Antonio Santos; Jose-Felipe Solsona; Jose-Manuel Añon; Rosa-Maria Catalan; Maria-Jose Gutierrez; Ramon Fernandez-Cid; Vicente Gomez-Tello; Emilio Curiel; Enrique Fernandez-Mondejar; Joan-Carles Oliva; Ana Isabel Tizon; Javier Gonzalez; Pablo Monedero; Manuela Garcia Sanchez; M Victoria de la Torre; Pedro Ibañez; Fernando Frutos; Frutos Del Nogal; M Jesus Gomez; Alfredo Marcos; Paula Vera; Jose Manuel Serrano; Isabel Umaran; Andres Carrillo; M-Jose Lopez-Pueyo; Pedro Rascado; Begoña Balerdi; Borja Suberviola; Gonzalo Hernandez
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Are small hospitals with small intensive care units able to treat patients with severe sepsis?

Authors:  Matti Reinikainen; Sari Karlsson; Tero Varpula; Ilkka Parviainen; Esko Ruokonen; Marjut Varpula; Tero Ala-Kokko; Ville Pettilä
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  The intensive care unit volume-mortality relationship, is bigger better? An integrative literature review.

Authors:  Brett Abbenbroek; Christine M Duffield; Doug Elliott
Journal:  Aust Crit Care       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.737

5.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Mortality and intensive care volume in ventilated patients from 1995 to 2009 in the Australian and New Zealand binational adult patient intensive care database*.

Authors:  John L Moran; Patricia J Solomon
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Hospital volume-outcome relationships among medical admissions to ICUs.

Authors:  Lakshmi Durairaj; James C Torner; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Mary S Vaughan Sarrazin; Jon Yankey; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jack E Zimmerman; Andrew A Kramer; Douglas S McNair; Fern M Malila
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Why is there such a difference in outcome between Australian intensive care units and others?

Authors:  Rinaldo Bellomo; Peter J Stow; Graeme K Hart
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.706

10.  The influence of volume and intensive care unit organization on hospital mortality in patients admitted with severe sepsis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Linda Peelen; Nicolette F de Keizer; Niels Peek; Gert Jan Scheffer; Peter H J van der Voort; Evert de Jonge
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  11 in total

1.  Investigating associations between ICU level and quality of care in the Netherlands: reporting only SMRs is not the whole story.

Authors:  Armand R J Girbes; Margreeth B Vroom; Michael A Kuiper; Annemarie M G A de Smet; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Response to Girbes et al.: Investigating associations between ICU level and quality of care in the Netherlands: reporting only SMRs is not the whole story.

Authors:  Georg Heinrich Kluge; John P W Vogelaar; Emiel S Boon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Comparing intensive care units by size or level.

Authors:  Dylan W de Lange; Hannah Wunsch; Jozef Kesecioglu
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Specialist not tertiary: Providing intensive care medicine in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Chris Thorpe; Louella Vaughan
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2018-01-29

5.  [Reimbursement of intensive care services in the German DRG system : Current problems and possible solutions].

Authors:  R Riessen; C Hermes; K-F Bodmann; U Janssens; A Markewitz
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  Intensive care medicine in smaller hospitals: here to stay.

Authors:  Christopher M Thorpe
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2020-02

7.  PICU Volume and Outcome: A Severity-Adjusted Analysis.

Authors:  Barry P Markovitz; Irina Kukuyeva; Gerardo Soto-Campos; Robinder G Khemani
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.624

8.  Mapping the Characteristics of Critical Care Facilities: Assessment, Distribution, and Level of Critical Care Facilities from Central India.

Authors:  Saurabh Saigal; Jai Prakash Sharma; Abhijit Pakhare; Santosh Bhaskar; Sanjay Dhanuka; Sanjay Kumar; Yogesh Sabde; Pradip Bhattacharya; Rajnish Joshi
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-10

9.  Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Nelleke van Sluisveld; Anke Oerlemans; Gert Westert; Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven; Hub Wollersheim; Marieke Zegers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Post-intensive care outpatient clinic: is it feasible and effective? A literature review.

Authors:  Cassiano Teixeira; Regis Goulart Rosa
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2018-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.