Literature DB >> 25600057

A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.

Mahdieh Babaiasl1, Seyyed Hamed Mahdioun1, Poorya Jaryani2, Mojtaba Yazdani3.   

Abstract

Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or stroke is one of the leading causes of disability and loss of motor function. Millions of people around the world are effected by it each year. Stroke results in disabled arm function. Restoration of arm function is essential to regaining activities of daily living (ADL). Along with traditional rehabilitation methods, robot-aided therapy has emerged in recent years. Robot-aided rehabilitation is more intensive, of longer duration and more repetitive. Using robots, repetitive dull exercises can turn into a more challenging and motivating tasks such as games. Besides, robots can provide a quantitative measure of the rehabilitation progress. This article overviews the terms used in robot-aided upper-limb rehabilitation. It continues by investigating the requirements for rehabilitation robots. Then the most outstanding works in robot-aided upper-limb rehabilitation and their control schemes have been investigated. The clinical outcomes of the built robots are also given that demonstrates the usability of these robots in real-life applications and their acceptance. This article summarizes a review done along with a research on the design, simulation and control of a robot for use in upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke. Implications for Rehabilitation Reviewing common terms in rehabilitation of upper limb using robots Reviewing rehabilitation robots built up to date Reviewing clinical outcomes of the mentioned rehabilitation robots.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADL training; clinical testing of rehabilitation robots; impedance control; physiotherapy; robot-aided rehabilitation; stroke; upper-extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25600057     DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2014.1002539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  20 in total

1.  A Semi-passive Planar Manipulandum for Upper-Extremity Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Chih-Kang Chang; Edward P Washabaugh; Andrew Gwozdziowski; C David Remy; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Age is negatively associated with upper limb recovery after conventional but not robotic rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a secondary analysis of a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesca Cecchi; Marco Germanotta; Claudio Macchi; Angelo Montesano; Silvia Galeri; Manuela Diverio; Catiuscia Falsini; Monica Martini; Rita Mosca; Emanuele Langone; Dionysia Papadopoulou; Maria Chiara Carrozza; Irene Aprile
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Functional MRI in Conjunction with a Novel MRI-compatible Hand-induced Robotic Device to Evaluate Rehabilitation of Individuals Recovering from Hand Grip Deficits.

Authors:  Mark P Ottensmeyer; Shasha Li; Gianluca De Novi; A Aria Tzika
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  BCI-FES With Multimodal Feedback for Motor Recovery Poststroke.

Authors:  Alexander B Remsik; Peter L E van Kan; Shawna Gloe; Klevest Gjini; Leroy Williams; Veena Nair; Kristin Caldera; Justin C Williams; Vivek Prabhakaran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  Sliding Mode Tracking Control of a Wire-Driven Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robot with Nonlinear Disturbance Observer.

Authors:  Jie Niu; Qianqian Yang; Xiaoyun Wang; Rong Song
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Recovery of Proprioception in the Upper Extremity by Robotic Mirror Therapy: a Clinical Pilot Study for Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Hyung Seok Nam; Sukgyu Koh; Jaewon Beom; Yoon Jae Kim; Jang Woo Park; Eun Sil Koh; Sun Gun Chung; Sungwan Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Ipsilesional Mu Rhythm Desynchronization and Changes in Motor Behavior Following Post Stroke BCI Intervention for Motor Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Alexander B Remsik; Leroy Williams; Klevest Gjini; Keith Dodd; Jaclyn Thoma; Tyler Jacobson; Matt Walczak; Matthew McMillan; Shruti Rajan; Brittany M Young; Zack Nigogosyan; Hemali Advani; Rosaleena Mohanty; Neelima Tellapragada; Janerra Allen; Mohsen Mazrooyisebdani; Leo M Walton; Peter L E van Kan; Theresa J Kang; Justin A Sattin; Veena A Nair; Dorothy Farrar Edwards; Justin C Williams; Vivek Prabhakaran
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  An innovative training based on robotics for older people with subacute stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elvira Maranesi; Roberta Bevilacqua; Mirko Di Rosa; Giuseppe Pelliccioni; Valentina Di Donna; Riccardo Luzi; Micaela Morettini; Agnese Sbrollini; Elisa Casoni; Nadia Rinaldi; Renato Baldoni; Fabrizia Lattanzio; Laura Burattini; Giovanni R Riccardi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Feedback training using a non-motorized device for long-term upper extremity impairment after stroke: a single group study.

Authors:  Ki Hun Cho; Won-Kyung Song
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-02-29

10.  Comparison of proximal versus distal upper-limb robotic rehabilitation on motor performance after stroke: a cluster controlled trial.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Hsieh; Keh-Chung Lin; Ching-Yi Wu; Tsai-Yu Shih; Ming-Wei Li; Chia-Ling Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.