Anna-Liisa Sutt1, Petrea Cornwell2, Daniel Mullany3, Toni Kinneally3, John F Fraser3. 1. Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: anna-liisa.sutt@health.qld.gov.au. 2. Behavioural Basis of Health, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, Australia; Allied Health Research Collaborative, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. 3. Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the introduction of in-line tracheostomy speaking valves (SVs) on duration of mechanical ventilation and time to verbal communication in patients requiring tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation in a predominantly cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective preobservational-postobservational study using data from the ICU clinical information system and medical record. Extracted data included demographics, diagnoses and disease severity, mechanical ventilation requirements, and details on verbal communication and oral intake. RESULTS: Data were collected on 129 patients. Mean age was 59 ± 16 years, with 75% male. Demographics, case mix, and median time from intubation to tracheostomy (6 days preimplementation-postimplementation) were unchanged between timepoints. A significant decrease in time from tracheostomy to establishing verbal communication was observed (18 days preimplementation and 9 days postimplementation, P <.05). There was no difference in length of mechanical ventilation (20 days preimplementation-post) or time to decannulation (14 days preimplementation-postimplementation). No adverse events were documented in relation to the introduction of in-line SVs. CONCLUSIONS: In-line SVs were successfully implemented in mechanically ventilated tracheostomized patient population. This resulted in earlier verbal communication, no detrimental effect on ventilator weaning times, and no change in decannulation times. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare tracheostomy outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients in a cardiothoracic ICU preintroduction and postintroduction of in-line SVs. It was hypothesized that in-line SVs would improve communication and swallowing specific outcomes with no increase in average time to decannulation or the number of adverse events.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the introduction of in-line tracheostomy speaking valves (SVs) on duration of mechanical ventilation and time to verbal communication in patients requiring tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation in a predominantly cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective preobservational-postobservational study using data from the ICU clinical information system and medical record. Extracted data included demographics, diagnoses and disease severity, mechanical ventilation requirements, and details on verbal communication and oral intake. RESULTS: Data were collected on 129 patients. Mean age was 59 ± 16 years, with 75% male. Demographics, case mix, and median time from intubation to tracheostomy (6 days preimplementation-postimplementation) were unchanged between timepoints. A significant decrease in time from tracheostomy to establishing verbal communication was observed (18 days preimplementation and 9 days postimplementation, P <.05). There was no difference in length of mechanical ventilation (20 days preimplementation-post) or time to decannulation (14 days preimplementation-postimplementation). No adverse events were documented in relation to the introduction of in-line SVs. CONCLUSIONS: In-line SVs were successfully implemented in mechanically ventilated tracheostomized patient population. This resulted in earlier verbal communication, no detrimental effect on ventilator weaning times, and no change in decannulation times. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare tracheostomy outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients in a cardiothoracic ICU preintroduction and postintroduction of in-line SVs. It was hypothesized that in-line SVs would improve communication and swallowing specific outcomes with no increase in average time to decannulation or the number of adverse events.
Authors: J D Rollnik; J Adolphsen; J Bauer; M Bertram; J Brocke; C Dohmen; E Donauer; M Hartwich; M D Heidler; V Huge; S Klarmann; S Lorenzl; M Lück; M Mertl-Rötzer; T Mokrusch; D A Nowak; T Platz; L Riechmann; F Schlachetzki; A von Helden; C W Wallesch; D Zergiebel; M Pohl Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Anna-Liisa Sutt; Lawrence R Caruana; Kimble R Dunster; Petrea L Cornwell; Chris M Anstey; John F Fraser Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 9.097