Literature DB >> 25599778

Location of rectal cancer as determined using rectal magnetic resonance imaging, and its relationship with pulmonary metastasis.

Na Yeon Han1, Min Ju Kim, Beom Jin Park, Deuk Jae Sung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in locating rectal cancer, and to determine whether tumor location correlates with the incidence of pulmonary metastasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 146 patients with confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma underwent 3-T rectal MRI, and abdominal and chest computed tomography (CT) within 2 weeks of the endoscopic examination. We reviewed the distance between the mass and the anal verge recorded in the endoscopic reports of these patients. Two radiologists evaluated the same distance on MRI scans by using picture archiving and communications systems. Multiple factors including the tumor location, primary tumor and lymph node stage, lung and liver metastasis, pathologic differentiation, and the carcinoembryonic antigen level were evaluated. The correlation between tumor location on MRI and endoscopy was assessed, and significant factors influencing pulmonary metastasis were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between the tumor location established using MRI and the actual location recorded during endoscopy. The incidence of pulmonary metastasis was significantly higher in patients with lower rectal cancer (11/17, 65%) compared to those with upper rectal cancer (6/17, 35%; p<0.05). Factors associated with pulmonary metastasis were tumor location and the presence of liver metastasis.
CONCLUSION: The accurate tumor location could be indicated using 3-T rectal MRI. Pulmonary metastasis occurred more frequently in patients with lower rectal cancer than in those with upper rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25599778     DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2014.5616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1300-4948            Impact factor:   1.852


  3 in total

1.  How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers.

Authors:  Yeo Eun Han; Beom Jin Park; Deuk Jae Sung; Min Ju Kim; Na Yeon Han; Ki Choon Sim; Sung Bum Cho; Jin Kim; Seon-Hahn Kim; Hyonggin An
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-20

2.  A relationship to survival is seen by combining the factors of mismatch repair status, tumor location and age of onset in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Pan Li; Zhitao Xiao; Todd A Braciak; Qingjian Ou; Gong Chen; Fuat S Oduncu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Characterizing MRI features of rectal cancers with different KRAS status.

Authors:  Yanyan Xu; Qiaoyu Xu; Yanhui Ma; Jianghui Duan; Haibo Zhang; Tongxi Liu; Lu Li; Hongliang Sun; Kaining Shi; Sheng Xie; Wu Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.