Wendi S Lambert1, Brian J Carlson1, Alice E van der Ende2, Grace Shih1, Julia N Dobish3, David J Calkins4, Eva Harth2. 1. The Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 2. Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. 3. Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 4. The Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA ; Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We examined the efficacy of an extended-release drug delivery system, nanosponge (NS) encapsulated compounds, administered intravitreally to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in mice. METHODS: Bilateral ocular hypertension was induced in mice by injecting microbeads into the anterior chamber. Hypertensive mice received NS loaded with ocular hypotensive drugs via intravitreal injection and IOP was monitored. Retinal deposition and retinal ganglion cell (RGC) uptake of Neuro-DiO were examined following intravitreal injection of Neuro-DiO-NS using confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Brimonidine-loaded NS lowered IOP 12% to 30% for up to 6 days (P < 0.02), whereas travoprost-NS lowered IOP 19% to 29% for up to 4 days (P < 0.02) compared to saline injection. Three bimatoprost NS were tested: a 400-nm NS and two 700-nm NS with amorphous (A-NS) or amorphous/crystalline (AC-NS) crosslinkers. A single injection of 400 nm NS lowered IOP 24% to 33% for up to 17 days compared to saline, while A-NS and AC-NS lowered IOP 22% to 32% and 18% to 26%, respectively, for up to 32 days (P < 0.046). Over time retinal deposition of Neuro-DiO increased from 19% to 71%; Neuro-DiO released from NS was internalized by RGCs. CONCLUSIONS: A single injection of NS can effectively deliver ocular hypotensive drugs in a linear and continuous manner for up to 32 days. Also, NS may be effective at targeting RGCs, the neurons that degenerate in glaucoma. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Patient compliance is a major issue in glaucoma. The use of NS to deliver a controlled, sustained release of therapeutics could drastically reduce the number of patients that progress to vision loss in this disease.
PURPOSE: We examined the efficacy of an extended-release drug delivery system, nanosponge (NS) encapsulated compounds, administered intravitreally to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in mice. METHODS: Bilateral ocular hypertension was induced in mice by injecting microbeads into the anterior chamber. Hypertensive mice received NS loaded with ocular hypotensive drugs via intravitreal injection and IOP was monitored. Retinal deposition and retinal ganglion cell (RGC) uptake of Neuro-DiO were examined following intravitreal injection of Neuro-DiO-NS using confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Brimonidine-loaded NS lowered IOP 12% to 30% for up to 6 days (P < 0.02), whereas travoprost-NS lowered IOP 19% to 29% for up to 4 days (P < 0.02) compared to saline injection. Three bimatoprost NS were tested: a 400-nm NS and two 700-nm NS with amorphous (A-NS) or amorphous/crystalline (AC-NS) crosslinkers. A single injection of 400 nm NS lowered IOP 24% to 33% for up to 17 days compared to saline, while A-NS and AC-NS lowered IOP 22% to 32% and 18% to 26%, respectively, for up to 32 days (P < 0.046). Over time retinal deposition of Neuro-DiO increased from 19% to 71%; Neuro-DiO released from NS was internalized by RGCs. CONCLUSIONS: A single injection of NS can effectively deliver ocular hypotensive drugs in a linear and continuous manner for up to 32 days. Also, NS may be effective at targeting RGCs, the neurons that degenerate in glaucoma. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Patient compliance is a major issue in glaucoma. The use of NS to deliver a controlled, sustained release of therapeutics could drastically reduce the number of patients that progress to vision loss in this disease.
Authors: Rebecca M Sappington; Brian J Carlson; Samuel D Crish; David J Calkins Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kelly W Muir; Cecile Santiago-Turla; Sandra S Stinnett; Leon W Herndon; R Rand Allingham; Pratap Challa; Paul P Lee Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Ralph J Passarella; Daniel E Spratt; Alice E van der Ende; John G Phillips; Hongmei Wu; Vasanth Sathiyakumar; Li Zhou; Dennis E Hallahan; Eva Harth; Roberto Diaz Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Sophie J Bakri; Darius M Moshfeghi; Steve Francom; Amy Chen Rundle; Daniel S Reshef; Paul P Lee; Carol Schaeffer; Roman G Rubio; Phillip Lai Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-01-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Mark C Gillies; Richard J Walton; Jennifer J Arnold; Ian L McAllister; Judy M Simpson; Alex P Hunyor; Robyn Guymer; Rohan W Essex; Nigel Morlet; Daniel Barthelmes Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Maria Jesus Rodrigo; Amaya Pérez Del Palomar; Alberto Montolío; Silvia Mendez-Martinez; Manuel Subias; Maria Jose Cardiel; Teresa Martinez-Rincon; José Cegoñino; José Maria Fraile; Eugenio Vispe; José Antonio Mayoral; Vicente Polo; Elena Garcia-Martin Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 6.321