Kirk J Pak1, Tian Hu2, Colin Fee1, Richard Wang3, Morgan Smith3, Lydia A Bazzano4. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA. 3. The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA ; Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA ; The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few clinical practice guidelines provide management recommendations for acute hypertensive episodes except in the context of specific conditions such as pregnancy and stroke. METHODS: We performed a systematic search to identify guidelines addressing acute hypertension and appraised the guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) validated quality assessment tool. Two reviewers independently appraised and one extracted key recommendations. Literature on secondary hypertension, hypertension in pregnancy, preeclampsia/eclampsia, stroke, aortic dissection, and pheochromocytoma was excluded. RESULTS: Three guidelines were identified, sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) in conjunction with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). AGREE II yielded mean domain (%) and overall assessment scores (1-7) as follows: NHLBI: 73%, 5.5; ACEP: 67%, 5.5; and ESH/ESC: 56%, 4.5. In hypertensive emergencies, the NHLBI guideline recommends reducing mean arterial pressure by ≤25% for the first hour, and then to 160/100-110 mmHg by 2-6 hours with subsequent gradual normalization in 24-48 hours. The ESH/ESC has similar recommendations. The ACEP does not address guidelines for hypertensive emergency but focuses on whether screening for target organ damage or medical intervention in patients with asymptomatic elevated blood pressure in emergency departments reduces the rate of adverse outcomes, concluding that routine screening does not reduce adverse outcomes, but patients with poor follow-up may benefit from routine screening. CONCLUSION: NHLBI and ESH/ESC guidelines are high quality and provide similar recommendations for management of asymptomatic acute hypertensive episodes and hypertensive emergencies. Additional research is needed to inform clinical practice guidelines for this common condition.
BACKGROUND: Few clinical practice guidelines provide management recommendations for acute hypertensive episodes except in the context of specific conditions such as pregnancy and stroke. METHODS: We performed a systematic search to identify guidelines addressing acute hypertension and appraised the guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) validated quality assessment tool. Two reviewers independently appraised and one extracted key recommendations. Literature on secondary hypertension, hypertension in pregnancy, preeclampsia/eclampsia, stroke, aortic dissection, and pheochromocytoma was excluded. RESULTS: Three guidelines were identified, sponsored by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) in conjunction with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). AGREE II yielded mean domain (%) and overall assessment scores (1-7) as follows: NHLBI: 73%, 5.5; ACEP: 67%, 5.5; and ESH/ESC: 56%, 4.5. In hypertensive emergencies, the NHLBI guideline recommends reducing mean arterial pressure by ≤25% for the first hour, and then to 160/100-110 mmHg by 2-6 hours with subsequent gradual normalization in 24-48 hours. The ESH/ESC has similar recommendations. The ACEP does not address guidelines for hypertensive emergency but focuses on whether screening for target organ damage or medical intervention in patients with asymptomatic elevated blood pressure in emergency departments reduces the rate of adverse outcomes, concluding that routine screening does not reduce adverse outcomes, but patients with poor follow-up may benefit from routine screening. CONCLUSION: NHLBI and ESH/ESC guidelines are high quality and provide similar recommendations for management of asymptomatic acute hypertensive episodes and hypertensive emergencies. Additional research is needed to inform clinical practice guidelines for this common condition.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acute disease; arterial pressure; blood pressure; emergency treatment; hypertension–malignant; practice guidelines as topic
Authors: Melissa C Brouwers; Michelle E Kho; George P Browman; Jako S Burgers; Francoise Cluzeau; Gene Feder; Béatrice Fervers; Ian D Graham; Jeremy Grimshaw; Steven E Hanna; Peter Littlejohns; Julie Makarski; Louise Zitzelsberger Journal: CMAJ Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Patricia M Kearney; Megan Whelton; Kristi Reynolds; Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 15-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kaberi Dasgupta; Robert R Quinn; Kelly B Zarnke; Doreen M Rabi; Pietro Ravani; Stella S Daskalopoulou; Simon W Rabkin; Luc Trudeau; Ross D Feldman; Lyne Cloutier; Ally Prebtani; Robert J Herman; Simon L Bacon; Richard E Gilbert; Marcel Ruzicka; Donald W McKay; Tavis S Campbell; Steven Grover; George Honos; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Peter Bolli; Thomas W Wilson; Patrice Lindsay; Michael D Hill; Shelagh B Coutts; Gord Gubitz; Mark Gelfer; Michel Vallée; G V Ramesh Prasad; Marcel Lebel; Donna McLean; J Malcolm O Arnold; Gordon W Moe; Jonathan G Howlett; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Pierre Larochelle; Lawrence A Leiter; Charlotte Jones; Richard I Ogilvie; Vincent Woo; Janusz Kaczorowski; Kevin D Burns; Robert J Petrella; Swapnil Hiremath; Alain Milot; James A Stone; Denis Drouin; Kim L Lavoie; Maxime Lamarre-Cliche; Guy Tremblay; Pavel Hamet; George Fodor; S George Carruthers; George B Pylypchuk; Ellen Burgess; Richard Lewanczuk; George K Dresser; S Brian Penner; Robert A Hegele; Philip A McFarlane; Milan Khara; Andrew Pipe; Paul Oh; Peter Selby; Mukul Sharma; Debra J Reid; Sheldon W Tobe; Raj S Padwal; Luc Poirier Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2014-02-22 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad; Josep Redon; Anna Dominiczak; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter M Nilsson; Michel Burnier; Margus Viigimaa; Ettore Ambrosioni; Mark Caufield; Antonio Coca; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland E Schmieder; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Thierry C Gillebert; Michal Tendera; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Stefan D Anker; Johann Bauersachs; Jana Brguljan Hitij; Mark Caulfield; Marc De Buyzere; Sabina De Geest; Geneviève Anne Derumeaux; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Christian Funck-Brentano; Vjekoslav Gerc; Giuseppe Germano; Stephan Gielen; Herman Haller; Arno W Hoes; Jens Jordan; Thomas Kahan; Michel Komajda; Dragan Lovic; Heiko Mahrholdt; Michael Hecht Olsen; Jan Ostergren; Gianfranco Parati; Joep Perk; Jorge Polonia; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Lars Rydén; Yuriy Sirenko; Alice Stanton; Harry Struijker-Boudier; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Massimo Volpe; David A Wood Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Marjolein J E Greuter; Nathalie M A van Emmerik; Maurice G A J Wouters; Maurits W van Tulder Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: A Cremer; F Amraoui; G Y H Lip; E Morales; S Rubin; J Segura; B J Van den Born; P Gosse Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Janet H Southerland; Danielle G Gill; Pandu R Gangula; Leslie R Halpern; Cesar Y Cardona; Charles P Mouton Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Date: 2016-10-17
Authors: Redmond-Craig Anderson; Vishal Patel; Nasim Sheikh-Bahaei; Chia Shang J Liu; Anandh G Rajamohan; Mark S Shiroishi; Paul E Kim; John L Go; Alexander Lerner; Jay Acharya Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Hanna Schröder; Stefan K Beckers; Klaudia Ogrodzki; Christina Borgs; Sebastian Ziemann; Andreas Follmann; Rolf Rossaint; Marc Felzen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 4.379