| Literature DB >> 25598323 |
Annika Steffen1, José-Maria Huerta2,3, Elisabete Weiderpass4,5,6,7, H B As Bueno-de-Mesquita8,9,10,11, Anne M May12, Peter D Siersema9, Rudolf Kaaks13, Jasmine Neamat-Allah13, Valeria Pala14, Salvatore Panico15, Calogero Saieva16, Rosario Tumino17, Alessio Naccarati18, Miren Dorronsoro19, Emilio Sánchez-Cantalejo3,20, Eva Ardanaz3,21, J Ramón Quirós22, Bodil Ohlsson23, Mattias Johansson24,25, Bengt Wallner26, Kim Overvad27, Jytte Halkjaer28, Anne Tjønneland28, Guy Fagherazzi29,30,31, Antoine Racine29,30,31, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon29,30,31, Tim J Key32, Kay-Tee Khaw33, Nick Wareham34, Pagona Lagiou35,36,37, Christina Bamia35, Antonia Trichopoulou38,37, Pietro Ferrari25, Heinz Freisling25, Yunxia Lu39, Elio Riboli39, Amanda J Cross39, Carlos A Gonzalez40, Heiner Boeing1.
Abstract
General obesity, as reflected by BMI, is an established risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), a suspected risk factor for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCC) and appears unrelated to gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma (GNCC). How abdominal obesity, as commonly measured by waist circumference (WC), relates to these cancers remains largely unexplored. Using measured anthropometric data from 391,456 individuals from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study and 11 years of follow-up, we comprehensively assessed the association of anthropometric measures with risk of EAC, GCC and GNCC using multivariable proportional hazards regression. One hundred twenty-four incident EAC, 193 GCC and 224 GNCC were accrued. After mutual adjustment, BMI was unrelated to EAC, while WC showed a strong positive association (highest vs. lowest quintile HR = 1.19; 95% CI, 0.63-2.22 and HR = 3.76; 1.72-8.22, respectively). Hip circumference (HC) was inversely related to EAC after controlling for WC, while WC remained positively associated (HR = 0.35; 0.18-0.68, and HR=4.10; 1.94-8.63, respectively). BMI was not associated with GCC or GNCC. WC was related to higher risks of GCC after adjustment for BMI and more strongly after adjustment for HC (highest vs. lowest quintile HR = 1.91; 1.09-3.37, and HR = 2.23; 1.28-3.90, respectively). Our study demonstrates that abdominal, rather than general, obesity is an indisputable risk factor for EAC and also provides evidence for a protective effect of gluteofemoral (subcutaneous) adipose tissue in EAC. Our study further shows that general obesity is not a risk factor for GCC and GNCC, while the role of abdominal obesity in GCC needs further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: abdominal obesity; body mass index; esophageal cancer; gastric cancer; general obesity; waist circumference
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25598323 PMCID: PMC6292492 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cancer ISSN: 0020-7136 Impact factor: 7.396