INTRODUCTION: The endothelium and angiogenesis are therapeutic targets in cancer. Response to treatment may be assessed by laboratory plasma markers such as circulating endothelial cells (CECs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), von Willebrand factor (vWf), soluble E selectin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiogenin. We hypothesised that these markers, obtained before surgery, would predict 2-year outcome after surgery with or without anti-angiogenic therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We recruited 154 patients with CRC, of whom 51 were treated with surgery alone, 74 were treated with standard chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil) and 29 were treated with standard chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF therapy (Avastin). Peripheral blood was taken before surgery. CD34(+)/CD45(-)/CD146(+) CECs and CD34(+)/CD45(-)/CD309 [KDR](+) EPCs were measured by flow cytometry and plasma markers by ELISA. RESULTS: After a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range 1.9-2.3 years), 52 of the patients (33.7 %) experienced a poor outcome (radiological and/or histological evidence of tumour spread or recurrence, or death [n = 26]). In univariate analysis, poor outcome was linked to Dukes' stage (p < 0.001), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (p < 0.001), type of treatment (surgery alone, standard chemotherapy with or without anti-antigenic therapy) (p = 0.047), CECs (p < 0.02) and EPCs (p < 0.01). In subsequent binary logistic regression analysis, only Dukes' stage (hazard ratio 2.3, 95 % confidence interval 1.0-5.3, p = 0.047) and modified AJCC stage (4.62, 1.88-11.33, p < 0.001) predicted a poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Endothelial cell markers (CECs, EPCs, vWf, soluble E selectin) and growth factors (VEGF and angiogenin), measured before surgery, have nothing extra to offer in predicting 2-year outcome in colorectal cancer when compared to Dukes' or AJCC stage.
INTRODUCTION: The endothelium and angiogenesis are therapeutic targets in cancer. Response to treatment may be assessed by laboratory plasma markers such as circulating endothelial cells (CECs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), von Willebrand factor (vWf), soluble E selectin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiogenin. We hypothesised that these markers, obtained before surgery, would predict 2-year outcome after surgery with or without anti-angiogenic therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We recruited 154 patients with CRC, of whom 51 were treated with surgery alone, 74 were treated with standard chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil) and 29 were treated with standard chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF therapy (Avastin). Peripheral blood was taken before surgery. CD34(+)/CD45(-)/CD146(+) CECs and CD34(+)/CD45(-)/CD309 [KDR](+) EPCs were measured by flow cytometry and plasma markers by ELISA. RESULTS: After a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range 1.9-2.3 years), 52 of the patients (33.7 %) experienced a poor outcome (radiological and/or histological evidence of tumour spread or recurrence, or death [n = 26]). In univariate analysis, poor outcome was linked to Dukes' stage (p < 0.001), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (p < 0.001), type of treatment (surgery alone, standard chemotherapy with or without anti-antigenic therapy) (p = 0.047), CECs (p < 0.02) and EPCs (p < 0.01). In subsequent binary logistic regression analysis, only Dukes' stage (hazard ratio 2.3, 95 % confidence interval 1.0-5.3, p = 0.047) and modified AJCC stage (4.62, 1.88-11.33, p < 0.001) predicted a poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Endothelial cell markers (CECs, EPCs, vWf, soluble E selectin) and growth factors (VEGF and angiogenin), measured before surgery, have nothing extra to offer in predicting 2-year outcome in colorectal cancer when compared to Dukes' or AJCC stage.
Authors: Charles F Bellows; Yan Zhang; Jinyun Chen; Marsha L Frazier; Mikhail G Kolonin Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Bin Li; Emerson E Sharpe; Amanda B Maupin; Amylynn A Teleron; Amy L Pyle; Peter Carmeliet; Pampee P Young Journal: FASEB J Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ignasio Gil-Bazo; Ignacio Gil Bazo; Victoria Catalán Goni; Victoria Catalán González; Alvaro Alonso Gutiérrez; Javier Rodríguez Rodríguez; José Antonio Páramo Fernández; Juan de la Cámara Gómez; José Luis Hernández Lizoain; Jesús García-Foncillas López Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S L Cheeseman; S P Joel; J D Chester; G Wilson; J T Dent; F J Richards; M T Seymour Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-08-12 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Elske C Gootjes; Jaco Kraan; Tineke E Buffart; Lotte Bakkerus; Barbara M Zonderhuis; Cornelis Verhoef; Henk M W Verheul; And Stefan Sleijfer Journal: Cells Date: 2020-01-05 Impact factor: 6.600