Literature DB >> 25596111

Detection and automated scoring of dicentric chromosomes in nonstimulated lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes after telomere and centromere staining.

Radhia M'kacher1, Elie El Maalouf2, Georgia Terzoudi3, Michelle Ricoul1, Leonhard Heidingsfelder4, Ionna Karachristou3, Eric Laplagne5, William M Hempel1, Bruno Colicchio6, Alain Dieterlen6, Gabriel Pantelias3, Laure Sabatier7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To combine telomere and centromere (TC) staining of premature chromosome condensation (PCC) fusions to identify dicentrics, centric rings, and acentric chromosomes, making possible the realization of a dose-response curve and automation of the process. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Blood samples from healthy donors were exposed to (60)Co irradiation at varying doses up to 8 Gy, followed by a repair period of 8 hours. Premature chromosome condensation fusions were carried out, and TC staining using peptide nucleic acid probes was performed. Chromosomal aberration (CA) scoring was carried out manually and automatically using PCC-TCScore software, developed in our laboratory.
RESULTS: We successfully optimized the hybridization conditions and image capture parameters, to increase the sensitivity and effectiveness of CA scoring. Dicentrics, centric rings, and acentric chromosomes were rapidly and accurately detected, leading to a linear-quadratic dose-response curve by manual scoring at up to 8 Gy. Using PCC-TCScore software for automatic scoring, we were able to detect 95% of dicentrics and centric rings.
CONCLUSION: The introduction of TC staining to the PCC fusion technique has made possible the rapid scoring of unstable CAs, including dicentrics, with a level of accuracy and ease not previously possible. This new approach can be used for biological dosimetry in radiation emergency medicine, where the rapid and accurate detection of dicentrics is a high priority using automated scoring. Because there is no culture time, this new approach can also be used for the follow-up of patients treated by genotoxic therapy, creating the possibility to perform the estimation of induced chromosomal aberrations immediately after the blood draw.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25596111     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

1.  Dose assessment intercomparisons within the RENEB network using G0-lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes (PCC assay).

Authors:  Georgia I Terzoudi; Gabriel Pantelias; Firouz Darroudi; Katarzyna Barszczewska; Iwona Buraczewska; Julie Depuydt; Dimka Georgieva; Valeria Hadjidekova; Vasiliki I Hatzi; Ioanna Karachristou; Maria Karakosta; Roberta Meschini; Radhia M'Kacher; Alegria Montoro; Fabrizio Palitti; Antonio Pantelias; Gaetano Pepe; Michelle Ricoul; Laure Sabatier; Natividad Sebastià; Sylwester Sommer; Anne Vral; Demetre Zafiropoulos; Andrzej Wojcik
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Gene Expression in Parp1 Deficient Mice Exposed to a Median Lethal Dose of Gamma Rays.

Authors:  M A Suresh Kumar; Evagelia C Laiakis; Shanaz A Ghandhi; Shad R Morton; Albert J Fornace; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Dose-response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals.

Authors:  Yu Abe; Mitsuaki A Yoshida; Kurumi Fujioka; Yumiko Kurosu; Risa Ujiie; Aki Yanagi; Naohiro Tsuyama; Tomisato Miura; Toshiya Inaba; Kenji Kamiya; Akira Sakai
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  The Application of Imaging Flow Cytometry to High-Throughput Biodosimetry.

Authors:  Ruth C Wilkins; Matthew A Rodrigues; Lindsay A Beaton-Green
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2017-01-23

Review 5.  Estimation of the effects of medical diagnostic radiation exposure based on DNA damage.

Authors:  Lin Shi; Satoshi Tashiro
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  New Therapeutic Strategies for Osteoarthritis by Targeting Sialic Acid Receptors.

Authors:  Paula Carpintero-Fernandez; Marta Varela-Eirin; Alessandra Lacetera; Raquel Gago-Fuentes; Eduardo Fonseca; Sonsoles Martin-Santamaria; Maria D Mayan
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-04-21

Review 7.  Utilization of cytogenetic biomarkers as a tool for assessment of radiation injury and evaluation of radiomodulatory effects of various medicinal plants - a review.

Authors:  Ravindra M Samarth; Meenakshi Samarth; Yoshihisa Matsumoto
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.162

8.  Comparison of Individual Radiosensitivity to γ-Rays and Carbon Ions.

Authors:  Grace Shim; Marie Delna Normil; Isabelle Testard; William M Hempel; Michelle Ricoul; Laure Sabatier
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  γ-H2AX Foci Persistence at Chromosome Break Suggests Slow and Faithful Repair Phases Restoring Chromosome Integrity.

Authors:  Michelle Ricoul; Tamizh Selvan Gnana Sekaran; Patricia Brochard; Cecile Herate; Laure Sabatier
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Use of human lymphocyte G0 PCCs to detect intra- and inter-chromosomal aberrations for early radiation biodosimetry and retrospective assessment of radiation-induced effects.

Authors:  Terri L Ryan; Antonio G Pantelias; Georgia I Terzoudi; Gabriel E Pantelias; Adayabalam S Balajee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.