Literature DB >> 25595842

Diagnostic pitfalls in Clostridium difficile infection.

Tim Planche1, Mark H Wilcox2.   

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is important not only for patient care but also for epidemiology and disease research. As it is not possible clinically to reliably differentiate CDI from other causes of health care-associated diarrhea, the laboratory confirmation of CDI is essential. Rapid commercial assays, including nucleic acid amplification tests and immunoassays for C difficile toxin and glutamate dehydrogenase, have largely superseded the use of older assays. Although assays that detect the presence of free C difficile toxin in feces are less frequently positive than tests for organism, they are preferable for the detection of CDI.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; Culture; Cytotoxin assay; Diagnostic accuracy; Immunoassay; Nucleic acid amplification test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25595842     DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2014.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am        ISSN: 0891-5520            Impact factor:   5.982


  13 in total

Review 1.  Primary Prevention of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea: Current Controversies and Future Tools.

Authors:  Zachary A Rubin; Elise M Martin; Paul Allyn
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins and laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Shuyi Chen; Huawei Gu; Chunli Sun; Haiying Wang; Jufang Wang
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 3.  Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Wiep Klaas Smits; Dena Lyras; D Borden Lacy; Mark H Wilcox; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 4.  Host response to Clostridium difficile infection: Diagnostics and detection.

Authors:  Elena A Usacheva; Jian-P Jin; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 5.  Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Shin; Esteban Chaves-Olarte; Cirle A Warren
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2016-06

6.  Diverse Energy-Conserving Pathways in Clostridium difficile: Growth in the Absence of Amino Acid Stickland Acceptors and the Role of the Wood-Ljungdahl Pathway.

Authors:  Simonida Gencic; David A Grahame
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Two-step Testing for Clostridioides Difficile is Inadequate in Differentiating Infection From Colonization in Children.

Authors:  Jacob M Parnell; Irtiqa Fazili; Sarah C Bloch; D Borden Lacy; Valeria A Garcia-Lopez; Rachel Bernard; Eric P Skaar; Kathryn M Edwards; Maribeth R Nicholson
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Comparison of a novel chemiluminescent based algorithm to three algorithmic approaches for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  J Goret; J Blanchi; C Eckert; S Lacome; A Petit; F Barbut; C Bébéar; Francis Mégraud
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.181

Review 9.  The Role of Rho GTPases in Toxicity of Clostridium difficile Toxins.

Authors:  Shuyi Chen; Chunli Sun; Haiying Wang; Jufang Wang
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.546

10.  Clinical impact of a Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile bedside infectious disease stewardship intervention.

Authors:  María Olmedo; Maricela Valerio; Elena Reigadas; Mercedes Marín; Luis Alcalá; Patricia Muñoz; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2020-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.