Literature DB >> 25595754

A portable NMR sensor to measure dynamic changes in the amount of water in living stems or fruit and its potential to measure sap flow.

Carel W Windt1, Peter Blümler2.   

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and NMR imaging (magnetic resonance imaging) offer the possibility to quantitatively and non-invasively measure the presence and movement of water. Unfortunately, traditional NMR hardware is expensive, poorly suited for plants, and because of its bulk and complexity, not suitable for use in the field. But does it need to be? We here explore how novel, small-scale portable NMR devices can be used as a flow sensor to directly measure xylem sap flow in a poplar tree (Populus nigra L.), or in a dendrometer-like fashion to measure dynamic changes in the absolute water content of fruit or stems. For the latter purpose we monitored the diurnal pattern of growth, expansion and shrinkage in a model fruit (bean pod, Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and in the stem of an oak tree (Quercus robur L.). We compared changes in absolute stem water content, as measured by the NMR sensor, against stem diameter variations as measured by a set of conventional point dendrometers, to test how well the sensitivities of the two methods compare and to investigate how well diurnal changes in trunk absolute water content correlate with the concomitant diurnal variations in stem diameter. Our results confirm the existence of a strong correlation between the two parameters, but also suggest that dynamic changes in oak stem water content could be larger than is apparent on the basis of the stem diameter variation alone.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; bean; compact; growth; oak; poplar; portable mobile; transport; water content

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25595754     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpu105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  10 in total

1.  Limits to flow detection in phase contrast MRI.

Authors:  Nathan H Williamson; Michal E Komlosh; Dan Benjamini; Peter J Basser
Journal:  J Magn Reson Open       Date:  2020-07-22

2.  phenoSeeder - A Robot System for Automated Handling and Phenotyping of Individual Seeds.

Authors:  Siegfried Jahnke; Johanna Roussel; Thomas Hombach; Johannes Kochs; Andreas Fischbach; Gregor Huber; Hanno Scharr
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Studying microstructure and microstructural changes in plant tissues by advanced diffusion magnetic resonance imaging techniques.

Authors:  Darya Morozov; Iris Tal; Odelia Pisanty; Eilon Shani; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 4.  In-Vivo NMR Spectroscopy: A Powerful and Complimentary Tool for Understanding Environmental Toxicity.

Authors:  Monica Bastawrous; Amy Jenne; Maryam Tabatabaei Anaraki; André J Simpson
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2018-05-24

5.  In vivo 3D brain and extremity MRI at 50 mT using a permanent magnet Halbach array.

Authors:  Thomas O'Reilly; Wouter M Teeuwisse; Danny de Gans; Kirsten Koolstra; Andrew G Webb
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Circadian Variation of Root Water Status in Three Herbaceous Species Assessed by Portable NMR.

Authors:  Magali Nuixe; Amidou Sissou Traoré; Shannan Blystone; Jean-Marie Bonny; Robert Falcimagne; Guilhem Pagès; Catherine Picon-Cochard
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16

7.  Rhizophoraceae Mangrove Saplings Use Hypocotyl and Leaf Water Storage Capacity to Cope with Soil Water Salinity Changes.

Authors:  Silvia Lechthaler; Elisabeth M R Robert; Nathalie Tonné; Alena Prusova; Edo Gerkema; Henk Van As; Nico Koedam; Carel W Windt
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  A mobile NMR lab for leaf phenotyping in the field.

Authors:  Maja Musse; Laurent Leport; Mireille Cambert; William Debrandt; Clément Sorin; Alain Bouchereau; François Mariette
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.993

Review 9.  Sensors and Instruments for Brix Measurement: A Review.

Authors:  Swapna A Jaywant; Harshpreet Singh; Khalid Mahmood Arif
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  In situ pod growth rate reveals contrasting diurnal sensitivity to water deficit in Phaseolus vulgaris.

Authors:  Andrew Merchant; Millicent R Smith; Carel W Windt
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 7.298

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.