Literature DB >> 25595397

Cost analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation for wound bed preparation preceding split-thickness skin grafts for massive (>100 cm(2)) chronic venous leg ulcers.

C Kevin Yang1, Sean Alcantara1, Selena Goss1, John C Lantis2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Massive (≥100 cm(2)) venous leg ulcers (VLUs) demonstrate very low closure rates with standard compression therapy and are costly to manage. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), followed by a split-thickness skin graft (STSG), can be a cost-effective alternative to this standard care. We performed a cost analysis of these two treatments.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 10 ulcers treated with surgical debridement, 7 days of inpatient NPWT with topical antiseptic instillation (NPWTi), and STSG, with 4 additional days of inpatient NPWT bolster over the graft. Independent medical cost estimators were used to compare the cost of this treatment protocol with standard outpatient compression therapy.
RESULTS: The average length of time ulcers were present before patients entered the study was 38 months (range, 3-120 months). Eight of 10 patients had complete VLU closure by 6 months after NPWTi with STSG. The 6-month costs of the proposed treatment protocol and standard twice-weekly compression therapy were estimated to be $27,000 and $28,000, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: NPWTi with STSG treatment is more effective for closure of massive VLUs at 6 months than that reported for standard compression therapy. Further, the cost of the proposed treatment protocol is comparable with standard compression therapy.
Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25595397     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  6 in total

1.  Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation, a cost-effective treatment for abdominal mesh exposure.

Authors:  E Deleyto; A García-Ruano; J R González-López
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Economic model to estimate cost of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation vs control therapies for hospitalised patients in the United States, Germany, and United Kingdom.

Authors:  Paul J Kim; Siobhan Lookess; Christine Bongards; Leah Passmore Griffin; Allen Gabriel
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  The impact of negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation on wounds requiring operative debridement: Pilot randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul J Kim; Lawrence A Lavery; Robert D Galiano; Christopher J Salgado; Dennis P Orgill; Stephen J Kovach; Brent H Bernstein; Christopher E Attinger
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Clinical recommendations and practical guide for negative pressure wound therapy with instillation.

Authors:  Subhas Gupta; Allen Gabriel; John Lantis; Luc Téot
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Strategies and challenges in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Shi-Yan Ren; Yong-Sheng Liu; Guo-Jian Zhu; Meng Liu; Shao-Hui Shi; Xiao-Dong Ren; Ya-Guang Hao; Rong-Ding Gao
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation: International consensus guidelines update.

Authors:  Paul J Kim; Christopher E Attinger; Thomas Constantine; Brett D Crist; Elizabeth Faust; Christoph R Hirche; Lawrence A Lavery; Valerie J Messina; Norihiko Ohura; Laurie J Punch; Garrett A Wirth; Ibby Younis; Luc Téot
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.