OBJECTIVE: Several characteristics of bone-targeted agents are considered when making treatment decisions. This study evaluated physicians' therapy preferences for preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors. METHODS: A Web-enabled, discrete-choice experiment online survey was conducted among physicians who treated patients with bone metastases and solid tumors in the United States. Respondents chose between pairs of hypothetical medications defined by combinations of six attributes at varying levels for two hypothetical patients. Preference weights for attribute levels were estimated using a random-parameters logit model. RESULTS: In total, 200 physicians completed the survey. Their mean age was 52 years, 57% were in practice for more than 15 years, 37% were oncologists, and 65% treated 10 or fewer patients with bone metastases weekly. Out-of-pocket cost to patients was the most important attribute overall. Among clinical outcomes, time to first SRE and risk of renal impairment were the most important attributes. Statistically significant preferences were observed for all attribute levels for time to first SRE, risk of renal impairment, and mode of administration. Predicted choice probability analysis showed that physicians preferred a hypothetical medication with attributes similar to those of denosumab over one with attributes similar to those of zoledronic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians indicated that clinical attributes are important when considering bone-targeting therapy for bone metastases, but consistent with the current health care landscape, patient out-of-pocket cost was the most important. With health care costs being increasingly shifted to patients, physicians require accurate information about co-pays and assistance programs to avoid patients receiving less costly, yet potentially inferior, treatment.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Several characteristics of bone-targeted agents are considered when making treatment decisions. This study evaluated physicians' therapy preferences for preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors. METHODS: A Web-enabled, discrete-choice experiment online survey was conducted among physicians who treated patients with bone metastases and solid tumors in the United States. Respondents chose between pairs of hypothetical medications defined by combinations of six attributes at varying levels for two hypothetical patients. Preference weights for attribute levels were estimated using a random-parameters logit model. RESULTS: In total, 200 physicians completed the survey. Their mean age was 52 years, 57% were in practice for more than 15 years, 37% were oncologists, and 65% treated 10 or fewer patients with bone metastases weekly. Out-of-pocket cost to patients was the most important attribute overall. Among clinical outcomes, time to first SRE and risk of renal impairment were the most important attributes. Statistically significant preferences were observed for all attribute levels for time to first SRE, risk of renal impairment, and mode of administration. Predicted choice probability analysis showed that physicians preferred a hypothetical medication with attributes similar to those of denosumab over one with attributes similar to those of zoledronic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians indicated that clinical attributes are important when considering bone-targeting therapy for bone metastases, but consistent with the current health care landscape, patient out-of-pocket cost was the most important. With health care costs being increasingly shifted to patients, physicians require accurate information about co-pays and assistance programs to avoid patients receiving less costly, yet potentially inferior, treatment.
Authors: J Arellano; J M González; Y Qian; M Habib; A F Mohamed; F Gatta; A B Hauber; J Posner; N Califaretti; E Chow Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Yi Qian; Jorge Arellano; Francesca Gatta; Guy Hechmati; A Brett Hauber; Ateesha F Mohamed; Amit Bahl; Roger von Moos; Jean-Jacques Body Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jamie L Welshhans; Jeffrey J Harmon; Ira Papel; Richard Gentile; Devinder Mangat; Patrick Byrne; Ryan M Collar Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 4.611
Authors: Rohini K Hernandez; Avanti Adhia; Sally W Wade; Emily O'Connor; Jorge Arellano; Kevin Francis; Hasmik Alvrtsyan; Ryan P Million; Alexander Liede Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Frank Xiaoqing Liu; Edward A Witt; Scot Ebbinghaus; Grace DiBonaventura Beyer; Reshma Shinde; Enrique Basurto; Richard W Joseph Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Ingo Diel; Sonja Ansorge; David Hohmann; Christina Giannopoulou; Daniela Niepel; Michele Intorcia Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 3.603