Literature DB >> 25595229

Applying dynamic simulation modeling methods in health care delivery research-the SIMULATE checklist: report of the ISPOR simulation modeling emerging good practices task force.

Deborah A Marshall1, Lina Burgos-Liz2, Maarten J IJzerman3, Nathaniel D Osgood4, William V Padula5, Mitchell K Higashi6, Peter K Wong7, Kalyan S Pasupathy8, William Crown9.   

Abstract

Health care delivery systems are inherently complex, consisting of multiple tiers of interdependent subsystems and processes that are adaptive to changes in the environment and behave in a nonlinear fashion. Traditional health technology assessment and modeling methods often neglect the wider health system impacts that can be critical for achieving desired health system goals and are often of limited usefulness when applied to complex health systems. Researchers and health care decision makers can either underestimate or fail to consider the interactions among the people, processes, technology, and facility designs. Health care delivery system interventions need to incorporate the dynamics and complexities of the health care system context in which the intervention is delivered. This report provides an overview of common dynamic simulation modeling methods and examples of health care system interventions in which such methods could be useful. Three dynamic simulation modeling methods are presented to evaluate system interventions for health care delivery: system dynamics, discrete event simulation, and agent-based modeling. In contrast to conventional evaluations, a dynamic systems approach incorporates the complexity of the system and anticipates the upstream and downstream consequences of changes in complex health care delivery systems. This report assists researchers and decision makers in deciding whether these simulation methods are appropriate to address specific health system problems through an eight-point checklist referred to as the SIMULATE (System, Interactions, Multilevel, Understanding, Loops, Agents, Time, Emergence) tool. It is a primer for researchers and decision makers working in health care delivery and implementation sciences who face complex challenges in delivering effective and efficient care that can be addressed with system interventions. On reviewing this report, the readers should be able to identify whether these simulation modeling methods are appropriate to answer the problem they are addressing and to recognize the differences of these methods from other modeling approaches used typically in health technology assessment applications.
Copyright © 2015 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; dynamic simulation modeling; health care delivery; methods

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25595229     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  42 in total

1.  Transforming Healthcare Delivery: Integrating Dynamic Simulation Modelling and Big Data in Health Economics and Outcomes Research.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Lina Burgos-Liz; Kalyan S Pasupathy; William V Padula; Maarten J IJzerman; Peter K Wong; Mitchell K Higashi; Jordan Engbers; Samuel Wiebe; William Crown; Nathaniel D Osgood
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Simulation Modelling in Healthcare: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Literature Reviews.

Authors:  Syed Salleh; Praveen Thokala; Alan Brennan; Ruby Hughes; Andrew Booth
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Designing and Assessing Multilevel Interventions to Improve Minority Health and Reduce Health Disparities.

Authors:  Tanya Agurs-Collins; Susan Persky; Electra D Paskett; Shari L Barkin; Helen I Meissner; Tonja R Nansel; Sonia S Arteaga; Xinzhi Zhang; Rina Das; Tilda Farhat
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Discrete Event Simulation-Based Resource Modelling in Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Syed Salleh; Praveen Thokala; Alan Brennan; Ruby Hughes; Simon Dixon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Addressing Challenges of Economic Evaluation in Precision Medicine Using Dynamic Simulation Modeling.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Luiza R Grazziotin; Dean A Regier; Sarah Wordsworth; James Buchanan; Kathryn Phillips; Maarten Ijzerman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.

Authors:  Jan L Brozek; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Elie A Akl; James M Bowen; John Bucher; Weihsueh A Chiu; Mark Cronin; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Maicon Falavigna; Gordon H Guyatt; Ami A Gordon; Michele Hilton Boon; Raymond C W Hutubessy; Manuela A Joore; Vittal Katikireddi; Judy LaKind; Miranda Langendam; Veena Manja; Kristen Magnuson; Alexander G Mathioudakis; Joerg Meerpohl; Dominik Mertz; Roman Mezencev; Rebecca Morgan; Gian Paolo Morgano; Reem Mustafa; Martin O'Flaherty; Grace Patlewicz; John J Riva; Margarita Posso; Andrew Rooney; Paul M Schlosser; Lisa Schwartz; Ian Shemilt; Jean-Eric Tarride; Kristina A Thayer; Katya Tsaioun; Luke Vale; John Wambaugh; Jessica Wignall; Ashley Williams; Feng Xie; Yuan Zhang; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Application of dynamic modelling techniques to the problem of antibacterial use and resistance: a scoping review.

Authors:  D E Ramsay; J Invik; S L Checkley; S P Gow; N D Osgood; C L Waldner
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.434

8.  Optimizing the interprofessional workforce for centralized intake of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid disease: case study.

Authors:  Esther Suter; Arden Birney; Paola Charland; Renee Misfeldt; Stephen Weiss; Jane Squire Howden; Jennifer Hendricks; Theresa Lupton; Deborah Marshall
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2015-05-28

9.  NETIMIS: Dynamic Simulation of Health Economics Outcomes Using Big Data.

Authors:  Owen A Johnson; Peter S Hall; Claire Hulme
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Simulation Modeling as a Novel and Promising Strategy for Improving Success Rates With Research Funding Applications: A Constructive Thought Experiment.

Authors:  Allen McLean; Wade McDonald; Donna Goodridge
Journal:  JMIR Nurs       Date:  2020-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.