Literature DB >> 25595228

Can we use social media to support content validity of patient-reported outcome instruments in medical product development?

Margaret Rothman1, Ari Gnanaskathy2, Paul Wicks3, Elektra J Papadopoulos4.   

Abstract

We report a panel designed to open a dialog between pharmaceutical sponsors, regulatory reviewers, and other stakeholders regarding the use of social media to collect data to support the content validity of patient-reported outcome instruments in the context of medical product labeling. Multiple stakeholder perspectives were brought together to better understand the issues encountered in pursuing social media as a form of data collection to support content validity. Presenters represented a pharmaceutical sponsor of clinical trials, a regulatory reviewer from the Food and Drug Administration, and an online data platform provider. Each presenter shared its perspective on the advantages and disadvantages of using social media to collect this type of information. There was consensus that there is great potential for using social media for this purpose. There remain, however, unanswered questions that need to be addressed such as identifying which type of social media is most appropriate for data collection and ensuring that participants are representative of the target population while maintaining the advantages of anonymity provided by online platforms. The use of social media to collect evidence of content validity holds much promise. Clarification of issues that need to be addressed and accumulation of empirical evidence to address these questions are essential to moving forward.
Copyright © 2015 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; online communities; patient-reported outcomes; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25595228     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  8 in total

1.  Putting patient-reported outcomes on the 'Big Data Road Map'.

Authors:  Melanie Calvert; Rob Thwaites; Derek Kyte; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Quality of life (QoL) for people with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC): a pragmatic strategy for identifying relevant QoL issues for rare disease.

Authors:  Elena Marcus; Patrick Stone; Douglas Thorburn; Martine Walmsley; Bella Vivat
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-07-15

3.  Exploring Concordance of Patient-Reported Information on PatientsLikeMe and Medical Claims Data at the Patient Level.

Authors:  Gabriel S Eichler; Elisenda Cochin; Jian Han; Sylvia Hu; Timothy E Vaughan; Paul Wicks; Charles Barr; Jenny Devenport
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  A comparison of three methods to generate a conceptual understanding of a disease based on the patients' perspective.

Authors:  Louise Humphrey; Thomas Willgoss; Andrew Trigg; Stephanie Meysner; Mary Kane; Sally Dickinson; Helen Kitchen
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2017-12-19

5.  The gap between knowledge and undergoing colorectal cancer screening using the Health Belief Model: A national survey.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Faisal Alghamdi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

6.  Patient-Centered Insights on Treatment Decision Making and Living with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Other Hematologic Cancers.

Authors:  Rebecca Crawford; Kate Sully; Rebecca Conroy; Chloe Johnson; Lynda Doward; Timothy Bell; Verna Welch; Francois Peloquin; Adam Gater
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Recruitment strategies and geographic representativeness for patient survey studies in rare diseases: Experience from the living with myeloproliferative neoplasms patient survey.

Authors:  Jingbo Yu; Dilan Paranagama; Shreekant Parasuraman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Validation of an instrument for perceived factors affecting fruit and vegetable intake based on Pender's health promotion model.

Authors:  Freshteh Khatti-Dizabadi; Jamshid Yazdani-Charati; Reza Amani; Firoozeh Mostafavi
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2022-02-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.